NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P600 are two low-profile, single-slot graphics cards from different generations, with the GTX 750 Ti built on the Maxwell architecture and the P600 on Pascal. Based on an aggregate of nine head-to-head benchmarks, the GTX 750 Ti takes seven wins against the P600’s two, yet the overall average benchmark scores are remarkably close: 2953 for the GTX 750 Ti versus 2923 for the P600, a difference of just 1%. Both cards sit at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, placing them in the entry-level segment of the performance spectrum.

Where Each One Wins

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the clear winner in DirectX-oriented workloads. Its lead is most pronounced in the Passmark DirectX 12 test, where it scores 18 against the P600’s 14, a 28.6% advantage. The gap narrows but remains positive in DirectX 11, with a score of 26 versus 24 (8.3% ahead), and in DirectX 10, where it scores 17 against 14 (21.4% ahead). Even in the legacy DirectX 9 test, the GTX 750 Ti edges out the P600 by 7.1%, scoring 60 to 56. This pattern suggests that the GTX 750 Ti’s higher shading unit count—640 versus 384—and its larger texture unit array (40 TMUs versus 24) give it a measurable edge in rasterization-heavy API workloads, despite the P600’s newer architecture.

The GTX 750 Ti also dominates in raw compute and general 3D performance. In the Passmark G3D test, it scores 3903 against the P600’s 3317, a 17.7% margin. The gap is even larger in the Passmark GPU Compute test, where the GTX 750 Ti scores 1744 versus 1415, a 23.3% lead. This compute advantage aligns with the GTX 750 Ti’s higher FP32 throughput of 1,388.8 GFLOPS, compared to the P600’s 1,195.8 GFLOPS. For users running general-purpose GPU compute or older DirectX-based applications, the GTX 750 Ti is the more capable card.

The Quadro P600, however, wins in two specific areas. Its most significant victory comes in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where it scores 11181 against the GTX 750 Ti’s 10827, a 3.2% margin. This is notable because OpenCL is a cross-platform compute standard often used in professional and scientific applications. The P600 also takes a razor-thin win in the Passmark G2D test, scoring 529 versus 528 (0.2% ahead), indicating parity in 2D desktop workloads. The P600’s advantage in OpenCL may stem from its Pascal architecture’s improved compute scheduling, even though it has fewer shaders.

The Verdict

From the data, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the better choice for users prioritizing DirectX gaming performance and general GPU compute. It wins seven of nine head-to-head benchmarks, with its largest margins in DirectX 12 (28.6%), GPU Compute (23.3%), and DirectX 10 (21.4%). The GTX 750 Ti also delivers a higher Passmark G3D score by 17.7%, which is a strong indicator of overall 3D rendering capability. Its higher FP32 throughput and greater number of shading units make it the more powerful card for most graphics-intensive tasks.

The Quadro P600, meanwhile, is the better pick for users who need OpenCL compute performance or who rely on DisplayPort connectivity. Its 3.2% lead in Geekbench OpenCL is a genuine advantage for compute-focused workloads. Additionally, the P600 offers four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the GTX 750 Ti only has two DVI ports and one mini-HDMI 1.4a. This makes the P600 considerably more flexible for multi-monitor professional setups. The P600 also has a lower TDP of 40 W versus the GTX 750 Ti’s 60 W, and it suggests a 200 W PSU instead of 250 W, making it easier to integrate into power-constrained systems.

Ultimately, the choice depends on the workload. For DirectX gaming and raw compute, the GTX 750 Ti is the stronger card. For OpenCL compute, multi-display output, and lower power consumption, the Quadro P600 is the more appropriate solution. The two cards are otherwise extremely close in average performance, with the GTX 750 Ti’s average score of 2953 sitting just 1% above the P600’s 2923, and both are effectively interchangeable in 2D tasks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victory for the GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes in the Passmark DirectX 12 test, where it scores 18 against the P600’s 14, a 28.6% delta. This is a significant gap for a generation-older card, and it suggests that the GTX 750 Ti’s Maxwell architecture handles DirectX 12 workload scheduling more efficiently than the P600’s Pascal design in this specific test. The GTX 750 Ti also wins the Passmark GPU Compute test by a wide margin, scoring 1744 versus 1415, a 23.3% lead, which reinforces its strength in general-purpose compute.

In the Passmark DirectX 10 test, the GTX 750 Ti scores 17 against the P600’s 14, a 21.4% advantage. The Passmark G3D test shows a 17.7% lead for the GTX 750 Ti, with scores of 3903 and 3317 respectively. The GTX 750 Ti also wins the DirectX 11 test by 8.3% (26 versus 24) and the DirectX 9 test by 7.1% (60 versus 56). These consistent wins across all DirectX versions indicate that the GTX 750 Ti’s higher texture fill rate of 43.40 GTexel/s, compared to the P600’s 37.37 GTexel/s, provides a tangible benefit in rasterization.

The Quadro P600’s biggest win is in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where it scores 11181 against the GTX 750 Ti’s 10827, a 3.2% delta. This is a relatively small margin, but it is consistent with the P600’s higher pixel rate of 24.91 GPixel/s versus the GTX 750 Ti’s 17.36 GPixel/s, which may help in certain compute tasks that rely on pixel throughput. The P600 also wins the Passmark G2D test by a negligible 0.2%, scoring 529 versus 528, effectively a tie. In the Geekbench Vulkan test, the GTX 750 Ti wins by 3.2%, scoring 10065 against the P600’s 9755, showing that its advantage extends to modern cross-platform APIs.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has an average benchmark score of 2953, while the NVIDIA Quadro P600 scores 2923, making the GTX 750 Ti 1% faster on average.

Q: How large is the GTX 750 Ti’s lead in DirectX 12 performance?

A: In the Passmark DirectX 12 test, the GTX 750 Ti scores 18 against the P600’s 14, a 28.6% advantage, which is its largest win in any benchmark.

Q: In which benchmark does the Quadro P600 outperform the GTX 750 Ti?

A: The Quadro P600 wins the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 11181 versus 10827 for the GTX 750 Ti, a 3.2% margin. It also wins the Passmark G2D test by a 0.2% margin, scoring 529 to 528.

Q: What is the difference in FP32 compute performance?

A: The GTX 750 Ti delivers 1,388.8 GFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Quadro P600 delivers 1,195.8 GFLOPS, giving the GTX 750 Ti a roughly 16% advantage in raw single-precision compute.

Q: How do the two cards compare in terms of memory bandwidth?

A: The GTX 750 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 86.40 GB/s, while the Quadro P600 has 64.13 GB/s, a difference that favors the GTX 750 Ti despite both cards having 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Which card has more display outputs?

A: The Quadro P600 has four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the GTX 750 Ti has two DVI ports and one mini-HDMI 1.4a, making the P600 more suitable for multi-monitor setups.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on different process nodes and architectures. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses the GM107 chip on NVIDIA’s Maxwell architecture, fabricated on a 28 nm process at TSMC. It contains 1,870 million transistors on a 148 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 12.6M / mm². The Quadro P600, in contrast, uses the GP107 chip on the Pascal architecture, manufactured by Samsung on a 14 nm process. The P600 packs 3,300 million transistors into a smaller 132 mm² die, achieving a much higher transistor density of 25.0M / mm². This newer process node allows the P600 to run at higher clock speeds—1329 MHz base and 1557 MHz boost versus the GTX 750 Ti’s 1020 MHz base and 1085 MHz boost—while consuming less power.

The core configurations differ significantly. The GTX 750 Ti has 640 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs. The Quadro P600 has only 384 shading units and 24 TMUs, but it also has 16 ROPs. Despite the lower core count, the P600 achieves a higher pixel rate of 24.91 GPixel/s versus the GTX 750 Ti’s 17.36 GPixel/s, thanks to its higher clock speeds. However, the GTX 750 Ti’s texture rate of 43.40 GTexel/s exceeds the P600’s 37.37 GTexel/s, and its FP32 throughput of 1,388.8 GFLOPS is higher than the P600’s 1,195.8 GFLOPS. The P600 also supports FP16 compute at 18.68 GFLOPS with a 1:64 ratio, a feature the GTX 750 Ti lacks entirely.

Memory configurations are similar in capacity but differ in speed. Both cards have 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, but the GTX 750 Ti runs its memory at 1350 MHz (5.4 Gbps effective), yielding 86.40 GB/s of bandwidth. The P600 runs its memory at 1002 MHz (4 Gbps effective), producing only 64.13 GB/s of bandwidth. The GTX 750 Ti’s memory advantage of roughly 35% is a key factor in its DirectX performance wins. In terms of API support, the GTX 750 Ti supports DirectX 12 (11_0), while the P600 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), giving the P600 a more modern feature set. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. Power consumption favors the P600, with a TDP of 40 W versus 60 W, and it suggests a 200 W PSU rather than the GTX 750 Ti’s 250 W requirement. The P600 is also slightly longer at 150 mm versus 145 mm, and it has a defined height of 69 mm, while the GTX 750 Ti’s height is unspecified.