NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is not a contest of equal footing; the recorded data shows a generational chasm. The GTX 675M, a Fermi 2.0 part from the GeForce 600M generation, delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 6946. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, built on Blackwell 2.0, posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. These benchmarks are not directly comparable due to different test methodologies, but the percentile rankings place both GPUs in a similar overall standing: the GTX 675M sits at the 39th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card, the data reveals how tightly clustered the GTX 675M is with its contemporaries. The AMD Radeon R5 M240 scores 6975, which is 0.4% higher than the GTX 675M. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M scores 7023, a 1.1% advantage. The NVIDIA T600 scores 7035, 1.3% higher. Only the AMD FirePro M5100 trails, at 6830, which is 1.7% lower. This suggests the GTX 675M is a mid-pack performer within its own era, slightly outpaced by the GTX 680M but competitive with mobile workstation parts.

For the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, the rival data shows a remarkably tight grouping. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores exactly 6270, matching the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER with a delta of 0%. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, 0.9% higher. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% lower. In this benchmark context, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is essentially neck-and-neck with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, a notable result given the architectural differences.

The wins are entirely one-sided in raw specifications, but the benchmark scores tell a nuanced story. The GTX 675M has a 39th percentile standing against all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile. This is surprising at first glance, but the benchmark types differ: the Geekbench OpenCL test used for the GTX 675M and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test used for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER measure different workloads. The data does not include any head-to-head benchmark entries, so the only cross-card comparison possible is through the percentile fields and the rival deltas.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER shows a 0% delta against the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which is the strongest statement in its rival set. The GTX 675M shows a 1.1% deficit against the GTX 680M, meaning the older card is not even the best of its own generation. In terms of raw benchmark scores, the GTX 675M posts a higher absolute number (6946 vs 6269.5), but this is an artifact of different test suites, not a sign of parity. The data must be read with the test methodology in mind: the GTX 675M was measured with OpenCL, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER was measured with a DX12 steel nomad test.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two NVIDIA parts is vast. The GTX 675M uses the GF114 chip on a 40 nm process from TSMC, with 1,950 million transistors on a 332 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 5.9 million per square millimeter. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on a 5 nm process, also from TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The density jumps to 120.6 million per square millimeter. The process node difference alone, from 40 nm to 5 nm, explains a significant portion of the performance and efficiency gap.

The GTX 675M has 384 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It has no RT cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, plus 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. This is a massive expansion in every compute category. The pixel rate for the GTX 675M is 9.920 GPixel/s, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER reaches 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 39.68 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 952.3 GFLOPS for the old card versus 43.94 TFLOPS for the new one, a roughly 46x increase. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has FP16 capability at 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the GTX 675M has no listed FP16 performance.

Memory configuration differs sharply. The GTX 675M has 2 GB of GDDR5 on a 256 bit bus, with a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s and a memory clock of 750 MHz, which is 3 Gbps effective. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on the same 256 bit bus, but bandwidth rises to 896.0 GB/s, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective. The capacity is 8x larger and the bandwidth is roughly 9.3x higher.

The GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0, which supports DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and has no Vulkan support listed. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is Blackwell 2.0, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The API feature set is a clear generation apart, with the newer card supporting hardware ray tracing and tensor acceleration via its dedicated cores.

Physical differences are also substantial. The GTX 675M is an MXM module with a bus interface of MXM-B (3.0), no power connectors, and a TDP of 100 W. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide, with a 1x 16-pin power connector, a TDP of 350 W, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

The Verdict

The data points to two completely different use cases. The GTX 675M is an end-of-life mobile part, released on 2012-03-21, part of the GeForce 600M generation, with a predecessor in the GeForce 500M and a successor in the GeForce 700M. Its benchmark percentile of 39 places it in the lower-middle range of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are all low-power mobile or workstation parts like the Radeon R5 M240 and the FirePro M5100. Anyone considering this card today would be limited by its 2 GB GDDR5 memory, lack of RT and tensor cores, and DirectX 12 (11_0) feature level.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, released on 2025-12-31, is an active product with a 36th percentile standing. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, matches its score exactly at 6270. This suggests that in the Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER does not outperform its predecessor; it is a parity product in this specific metric. The card offers 16 GB of GDDR7, 70 RT cores, 280 tensor cores, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, making it suitable for modern workloads including ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks.

The GTX 675M wins in no benchmark category against the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in terms of modern capability. Its OpenCL score of 6946 is an artifact of a different test, not a sign of competitiveness. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER offers a launch MSRP of 749 USD, stated once here for reference. The verdict is clear: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only viable choice for current software, while the GTX 675M is a historical artifact.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The GTX 675M sits at the 39th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6270, a delta of 0%.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The GTX 675M has 2 GB of GDDR5, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7.

Q: Does the GTX 675M support ray tracing?

A: No, the GTX 675M has no RT cores listed, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 RT cores.

Q: What is the TDP of each card?

A: The GTX 675M has a TDP of 100 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS, while the GTX 675M delivers 952.3 GFLOPS.

Where Each One Wins

The GTX 675M wins in the narrow sense of lower power draw, with a 100 W TDP versus 350 W for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. It also wins on portability, as an MXM module with no power connectors, suitable for laptops where space and cooling are constrained. Its benchmark percentile of 39 is higher than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36, though this is likely due to the differing test suites. In its own era, it was competitive with the GTX 680M, trailing by only 1.1%.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in every modern performance metric. It has 8960 shading units versus 384, 70 RT cores versus none, 280 tensor cores versus none, 16 GB GDDR7 versus 2 GB GDDR5, and a memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s versus 96.00 GB/s. Its FP32 compute of 43.94 TFLOPS dwarfs the 952.3 GFLOPS of the GTX 675M. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, while the GTX 675M is limited to DirectX 12 (11_0) and no Vulkan. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has modern display outputs (HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b) and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

For gaming, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only card with the hardware for ray tracing and tensor-based features. For compute workloads, the 280 tensor cores provide acceleration options that the GTX 675M lacks entirely. The GTX 675M is best suited for legacy applications that do not require modern API features or high memory capacity.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measurable specification. The process node changes from 40 nm to 5 nm, both TSMC. Transistor count goes from 1,950 million to 45,600 million, and die size from 332 mm² to 378 mm². Transistor density rises from 5.9M / mm² to 120.6M / mm².

The GTX 675M has no base or boost clock listed, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. Memory clocks are 750 MHz (3 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). Memory size is 2 GB versus 16 GB, type is GDDR5 versus GDDR7, and bandwidth is 96.00 GB/s versus 896.0 GB/s.

Shading units are 384 versus 8960, TMUs are 64 versus 280, and ROPs are 32 versus 96. RT cores are absent versus 70, and tensor cores are absent versus 280. Pixel rate is 9.920 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s, texture rate is 39.68 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 is 952.3 GFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 is not listed for the GTX 675M, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER lists 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1).

TDP is 100 W versus 350 W. Slot width is MXM Module versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. Bus interface is MXM-B (3.0) versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. DirectX support is 12 (11_0) versus 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL is 4.6 for both, and Vulkan is absent versus 1.4. The GTX 675M has no dimensions listed, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Production status is end-of-life versus active.