NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200 Comparison

The data presents a stark generational contrast: the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost come from different eras of GPU design, and their benchmark results reflect a significant performance gulf. The Quadro P2200, a Pascal-era professional card, decisively outpaces the older Kepler-based GeForce in every head-to-head test available, underscoring a major leap in compute capability and efficiency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only two overlapping benchmark results in the dataset reveal a dominant performance from the Quadro P2200. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the Quadro P2200 scores 32,344, while the GTX 650 Ti Boost manages only 9,302. This translates to a staggering 247.7% advantage for the Quadro, indicating it is more than three times as fast in this general-purpose compute workload. The sheer magnitude of this delta suggests not just a clock speed improvement, but a fundamental architectural advantage in raw processing throughput.

The Geekbench Vulkan test tells a similar story, though with a slightly smaller gap. The Quadro P2200 achieves 31,351 points, compared to the GTX 650 Ti Boost's 10,041. This represents a 212.2% delta in favor of the Quadro card. While Vulkan is a modern low-level API that can sometimes favor newer architectures, the result here is overwhelmingly one-sided. It is clear that the Quadro P2200's processing power dwarfs that of the older GeForce, making any contest between the two in these workloads a formality.

These results are consistent with the average benchmark scores for each card. The Quadro P2200 holds an average benchmark score of 8,686, while the GTX 650 Ti Boost sits at 8,067. While the delta in their average scores is a modest 7.7%, the head-to-head tests show a dramatic difference. This disparity suggests that the average score includes legacy DirectX tests where the older card is relatively less disadvantaged, but in modern compute and graphics APIs, the Quadro P2200's superiority is absolute. The data shows a clear winner in every shared test.

The Verdict

The verdict from the benchmark data is unambiguous. The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 is the superior performer in all measured categories. For any user whose primary concern is computational throughput, whether in OpenCL or Vulkan, the Quadro P2200 is the only logical choice from this pairing. Its performance is in a different league entirely, with a 247.7% lead in OpenCL and a 212.2% lead in Vulkan.

The GTX 650 Ti Boost, on the other hand, is a relic in comparison. Its performance, while respectable for its era, is now far behind modern standards. The data suggests that this card would struggle with modern workloads that the Quadro P2200 handles with relative ease. However, the GTX 650 Ti Boost does have a unique data point: a Geekbench Metal score of 4,858. The Quadro P2200 has no recorded Metal benchmark, which could indicate a lack of driver support or simply an absence of testing for that API. This is the only area where the GTX 650 Ti Boost has a presence in the data that the Quadro lacks.

Ultimately, the choice depends on the specific application. For OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, the Quadro P2200 is the definitive winner. The data does not support any scenario where the GTX 650 Ti Boost would be preferable in these areas. The Quadro also has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs (44th percentile versus the GTX's 42nd), reinforcing its overall stronger position. The GTX 650 Ti Boost is only relevant if a specific application requires the Metal API, a scenario not covered by the Quadro's data.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 in OpenCL performance?

A: The Quadro P2200 scores 32,344 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 247.7% higher than the GTX 650 Ti Boost's score of 9,302.

Q: Does the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost win in any benchmark?

A: No. In the head-to-head benchmarks provided (Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan), the GTX 650 Ti Boost loses both. It does, however, have a recorded Geekbench Metal score of 4,858, a test for which the Quadro P2200 has no data.

Q: What is the performance gap in the Vulkan API?

A: The Quadro P2200 leads by 212.2% in Geekbench Vulkan, with a score of 31,351 compared to the GTX 650 Ti Boost's 10,041.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Quadro P2200 has a higher average benchmark score of 8,686, while the GTX 650 Ti Boost averages 8,067.

Q: Which card has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Quadro P2200 ranks in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, while the GTX 650 Ti Boost ranks in the 42nd percentile.

Q: Is the GTX 650 Ti Boost a close competitor to the Quadro P2200?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows a massive performance gulf. The Quadro P2200's nearest rivals are cards like the GeForce GTX 460 v2 and RTX 3050 A Mobile, while the GTX 650 Ti Boost's nearest rivals include the GRID K2 and its own non-Boost variant. They are not in the same performance tier.

Specification Differences

The specifications of the two cards highlight the massive generational gap. The Quadro P2200 is built on a 16 nm process, while the GTX 650 Ti Boost uses a 28 nm node. This allows the Quadro to pack 4,400 million transistors into a smaller 200 mm² die, versus 2,540 million in a larger 221 mm² die for the GTX. The Quadro's transistor density is 22.0M / mm², nearly double the GTX's 11.5M / mm².

Memory configurations are also starkly different. The Quadro P2200 features 5 GB of GDDR5X memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 200.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The GTX 650 Ti Boost has 2 GB of GDDR5 on a 192-bit bus, with a lower 144.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Quadro also has a much higher memory clock at 1251 MHz (10 Gbps effective) versus the GTX's 1502 MHz (6 Gbps effective).

The core configurations differ significantly. The Quadro P2200 has 1280 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 40 ROPs. In contrast, the GTX 650 Ti Boost has 768 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. Consequently, the Quadro's pixel rate is 59.72 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 119.4 GTexel/s, far exceeding the GTX's 16.51 GPixel/s and 66.05 GTexel/s. The Quadro's FP32 performance is 3.822 TFLOPS, more than double the GTX's 1.585 TFLOPS. The Quadro also has a much lower TDP of 75 W versus the GTX's 134 W, and it is a single-slot card with no power connectors, while the GTX is dual-slot and requires a 6-pin connector.

Architecture Differences

The architectural differences are foundational. The Quadro P2200 is based on the Pascal architecture, using the GP106 chip, while the GTX 650 Ti Boost uses the older Kepler architecture with the GK106 chip. This generational leap is the primary driver of the performance disparity.

The Pascal architecture in the Quadro supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Kepler-based GTX supports DirectX 12 (11_0) and Vulkan 1.2.175. The Quadro also supports FP16 compute at a rate of 59.72 GFLOPS (1:64), a feature the GTX 650 Ti Boost lacks entirely. This indicates a more modern compute pipeline in the Quadro, which is better suited for contemporary workloads.

Display outputs also differ, with the Quadro P2200 offering four DisplayPort 1.4a connections, ideal for professional multi-monitor setups. The GTX 650 Ti Boost provides older 2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, and 1x DisplayPort 1.2. The Quadro's physical dimensions are also more compact at 201 mm in length, compared to the GTX's 241 mm. These differences reflect the Quadro's design as a professional, power-efficient workstation card, whereas the GTX is a more traditional, power-hungry consumer gaming card from an earlier time.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the data, the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 is the winner in every measurable category that overlaps. It dominates in OpenCL and Vulkan compute performance, with a 247.7% and 212.2% lead, respectively. It also wins on memory bandwidth, capacity, and raw compute throughput (FP32). Its higher average benchmark score and better percentile ranking confirm its overall superiority. The Quadro is the clear choice for any application that leverages these modern APIs, such as professional rendering, simulation, or general GPU compute tasks. Its lower power draw and single-slot design also make it a more flexible option for dense workstation builds.

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost's only unique advantage in the data is its recorded Geekbench Metal score of 4,858. Since the Quadro P2200 has no benchmark entry for Metal, it's impossible to compare them in that API. This means that for any hypothetical macOS or iOS development workload that relies on Metal, the GTX 650 Ti Boost is the only card in this comparison with demonstrated capability. Outside of that specific scenario, the data offers no reason to choose the GTX 650 Ti Boost over the Quadro P2200. Its performance is consistently and massively behind, and its specifications are from an older, less efficient era. The decision is clear for all but the most niche Metal-specific use cases.