NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER represent two distant endpoints in GPU evolution, separated by over a decade of architectural advancement. The data available for direct comparison is limited to a single benchmark score for each card, measured under different test suites, which complicates a straightforward head-to-head analysis. The GTX 460 SE posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 6389, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. These are not directly comparable metrics, but the underlying specifications reveal the immense generational gap. The GTX 460 SE, built on a 40 nm process with 1,950 million transistors, delivers 748.8 GFLOPS of FP32 performance, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, on a 5 nm node with 45,600 million transistors, delivers 43.94 TFLOPS — a 58.7-fold increase in raw compute throughput. This disparity defines every aspect of their respective performance profiles.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results, while from different suites, place both cards in surprisingly similar percentile positions relative to all GPUs. The GTX 460 SE sits at the 37th percentile, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile. This indicates that despite the massive architectural differences, both cards occupy a comparable mid-range tier in their respective eras. The GTX 460 SE’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M, matches its score exactly at 6389 with a 0% delta, suggesting the GTX 460 SE was well-positioned against contemporary mobile parts. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, also matches at 6270 with a 0% delta, indicating parity with the previous generation’s high-end offering.

In terms of memory bandwidth, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds a decisive advantage. Its 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is 8.2 times higher than the GTX 460 SE’s 108.8 GB/s. This translates directly to texture and pixel throughput: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves 686.6 GTexel/s and 235.4 GPixel/s, compared to the GTX 460 SE’s 31.20 GTexel/s and 7.800 GPixel/s. The compute gap is even more pronounced in FP32 throughput, where the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 43.94 TFLOPS dwarfs the GTX 460 SE’s 748.8 GFLOPS. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, delivering another 43.94 TFLOPS, a capability entirely absent from the older card.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s shading unit count of 8960 versus the GTX 460 SE’s 288 represents a 31.1-fold increase. Texture mapping units follow a similar trend: 280 versus 48, a 5.8-fold increase. Raster operation units scale from 32 to 96, a 3.0-fold increase. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also introduces 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, features that did not exist in the Fermi architecture. The GTX 460 SE’s memory configuration of 1024 MB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus contrasts with the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 16 GB GDDR7 on the same bus width, with the newer card leveraging a higher memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus the older card’s 850 MHz (3.4 Gbps effective).

Where Each One Wins

The GTX 460 SE wins in the context of its historical release period and legacy software compatibility. It supports DirectX 12 (11_0), which is a limited implementation compared to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, for users running older operating systems or applications that rely on legacy drivers, the Fermi architecture may offer more stable support for early DirectX 11 titles. The GTX 460 SE also has a significantly lower power draw at 150 W TDP versus the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 350 W, making it more suitable for older power supplies or compact systems without updated connectors. Its 2x 6-pin power connectors are more universally compatible with legacy PSUs than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 1x 16-pin connector.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in virtually every modern performance metric. Its 16 GB VRAM capacity is 16 times greater, enabling high-resolution textures and large datasets that would exhaust the GTX 460 SE’s 1024 MB. The newer card’s GDDR7 memory operates at 28 Gbps effective, providing 8.2 times the bandwidth. In compute workloads, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s FP32 performance is 58.7 times higher, and its FP16 capability at 43.94 TFLOPS opens up AI and machine learning tasks that are entirely infeasible on the GTX 460 SE. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores enable real-time ray tracing and DLSS-style features, which are absent on the Fermi-based card.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also wins on connectivity and modern standards. It supports PCIe 5.0 x16 versus the GTX 460 SE’s PCIe 2.0 x16, offering 4 times the bandwidth for data transfer. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting high refresh rates and multi-monitor setups, while the GTX 460 SE is limited to 2x DVI and 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a. The newer card also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the GTX 460 SE has no Vulkan support listed.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally indicates that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the superior GPU for any modern workload. Its FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS is 58.7 times higher than the GTX 460 SE’s 748.8 GFLOPS. Memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s versus 108.8 GB/s means the newer card can feed its compute units far more effectively. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 16 GB VRAM is essential for contemporary games and professional applications, while the GTX 460 SE’s 1024 MB is a hard bottleneck. The inclusion of RT cores and tensor cores makes the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER future-proof for ray-traced titles and AI-accelerated features, none of which are possible on the GTX 460 SE.

For users with legacy systems, the GTX 460 SE remains a functional historical artifact. Its 150 W TDP and 2x 6-pin connectors make it easy to power in older rigs. Its DirectX 11_0 support covers a broad range of older games. However, its 37th percentile standing and its nearest rival being the GTX 580M at equal score indicate it was a mid-range part even in 2010. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 36th percentile standing, despite its massive specifications, suggests that the modern GPU market has shifted toward even higher-end parts, but within the context of this comparison, it is overwhelmingly dominant.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s nearest rival, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, matches its score exactly, indicating the new card is a generational refresh rather than a leap forward. The GTX 460 SE’s rivals, including the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and AMD Radeon R7 M350, are all within 1% of its score, showing tight competition in that era’s mid-range. Given the data, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only rational choice for anyone building or upgrading a system today, while the GTX 460 SE should be reserved for retro computing or educational purposes.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in raw compute compared to the GTX 460 SE?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the GTX 460 SE delivers 748.8 GFLOPS. This represents a 58.7-fold increase in raw floating-point throughput.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?

A: The GTX 460 SE has 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. The newer card offers 16 times more VRAM capacity.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The GTX 460 SE supports DirectX 12 (11_0), a limited feature set, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes advanced features like ray tracing and mesh shaders.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The GTX 460 SE has a TDP of 150 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W. The newer card requires more power, but also delivers significantly higher performance.

Q: How do the two cards compare in their benchmark percentile rankings?

A: The GTX 460 SE sits at the 37th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile. Despite the massive performance gap, both occupy similar relative positions in their respective eras.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 70 ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the GTX 460 SE’s Fermi architecture.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two cards is vast, spanning five major GPU generations. The GTX 460 SE is built on the Fermi architecture using the GF104 chip, manufactured on a 40 nm process at TSMC. It contains 1,950 million transistors on a 332 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 5.9 million per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process also at TSMC. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm² — a 20.4-fold increase in density.

The GTX 460 SE features 288 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. Its memory subsystem uses 1024 MB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 850 MHz (3.4 Gbps effective), providing 108.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scales this to 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Its memory subsystem uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The newer card also includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, which are entirely absent from the Fermi architecture.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2452 MHz, while the GTX 460 SE has no listed base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 850 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s, compared to the GTX 460 SE’s 7.800 GPixel/s and 31.20 GTexel/s. The FP16 compute capability of 43.94 TFLOPS on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a major addition, enabling mixed-precision workloads. In terms of connectivity, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 and provides 2x DVI and 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, while the GTX 460 SE lists no Vulkan support.