GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce GT 1010

CORE STATE GP108

VRAM 2 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1468 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Pascal

PROCESS 14 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

400

N/A

geekbench_opencl

20,255

6,698

geekbench_vulkan

30,336

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

890

N/A

passmark_g3d

5,310

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

2,840

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010

Visual performance comparisons between GeForce AMD Radeon 760M and Radeon NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 demonstrate a obvious victor. GeForce AMD Radeon 760M delivers considerably better frame rates across recent gaming benchmarks. The video memory edge and engineering upgrades translate into noticeably improved visual performance. Score numbers demonstrates this observation. Gamers demanding premium graphics will factor this in.

For RT, GeForce AMD Radeon 760M leaps further in front of Radeon NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010. The RT hardware manage demanding reflection rendering significantly more efficiently. Users wanting next-gen effects will definitely consider GeForce AMD Radeon 760M. The real-time ray tracing superiority is substantial. Modern games progressively utilize real-time ray tracing features.

For people weighing a purchase selection, GeForce AMD Radeon 760M appears as the preferred selection. Its consistent benchmark advantage over Radeon NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 makes it the smarter selection for performance-oriented users. Evaluate your personal requirements, however this evidence directs toward GeForce AMD Radeon 760M. Reach an smart selection. The gaming difference is measurable and meaningful.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

760M

GT 1010

Core Specs

Shading Units

512

256 -50.0%

Shaders

512

256 -50.0%

TMUs

16 -50.0%

ROPs

8 -50.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

1228 MHz

Boost Clock

2599 MHz

1468 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1502 MHz 6 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

2 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

2,048

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR5

Memory Bus

System Shared

64 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

48.06 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

16 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

256 KB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

41.58 GPixel/s

11.74 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

83.17 GTexel/s

23.49 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS

751.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)

31.32 GFLOPS (1:24)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)

—

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Power

TDP

15 W

30 W

TDP (W)

30 +100.0%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Pascal

GPU Name

Phoenix

GP108

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix)

GeForce 10

Process Size

4 nm

14 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

1,800 million

Die Size

178 mm²

74 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

142.6M / mm²

24.3M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

6.1

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Length

—

147 mm 5.8 inches

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

1x DVI1x mini-HDMI 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 3.0 x4

Other

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

GeForce 900

Successor

—

GeForce 20

View Radeon 760M Details View GeForce GT 1010 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M

GeForce GT 1010

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons