GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA CMP 90HX

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz
TDP 320 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
69,000
56,518
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
53,146
passmark_directx_10
N/A
57
passmark_directx_11
N/A
68
passmark_directx_12
N/A
47
passmark_directx_9
N/A
115
passmark_g2d
N/A
491
passmark_g3d
N/A
9,611
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
4,334

Analysis: NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Analyzing the test figures for NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile graphics card and NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 90HX GPU, the picture of matched frame rates appears. No graphics card excels reliably throughout all games. This back-and-forth of leads implies inherent parity. Consumers have a true decision with these options. The two cards provide strong graphics performance.

Considering a specification angle, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile graphics card and NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 90HX GPU share matching specs. Video memory amount, CUDA/stream processors, and interface speed are nearly comparable. The specification parity supports the comparable benchmark results. Not one has a considerable specification superiority. The matchup is level.

Considering a engineering standpoint, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile graphics card and NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 90HX GPU possess comparable specifications. Video memory capacity, compute processors, and bus speed are closely aligned. This spec balance supports the close test data. Not one maintains a notable engineering lead. This playing field is level.

At the end of the day, builders can pick based on ecosystem preference instead of raw frame rates solely. The two NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile graphics card and NVIDIA NVIDIA CMP 90HX GPU achieve strong graphics capability for their intended tiers. This determination rests on individual needs. Either pick is valid. Consumers shouldn't go badly between them.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
CMP 90HX
RTX A2000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
6,400
2,560 -60.0%
Shaders
6,400
2,560 -60.0%
TMUs
200
80 -60.0%
ROPs
80
48 -40.0%
SM Count
50
20 -60.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1687 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz 19 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
10 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
10,240
4,096 -60.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Memory Bus
320 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
760.3 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
5 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
136.8 GPixel/s
80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
342.0 GTexel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
21.89 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
342.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
21.89 TFLOPS (1:1)
8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
50
20 -60.0%
Tensor Cores
200
80 -60.0%
Power
TDP
320 W
95 W
TDP (W)
320
95 -70.3%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
GPU Name
GA102
GA107
Generation
Mining GPUs
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
8 nm
8 nm
Transistors
28,300 million
8,700 million
Die Size
628 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
Samsung
Density
45.1M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
285 mm 11.2 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Ada-MW
View CMP 90HX Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details