GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

CMP 90HX

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 10 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz

TDP 320 W

BUS WIDTH 320 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

2,612

N/A

geekbench_opencl

98,554

69,000

geekbench_vulkan

85,631

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

181

N/A

passmark_g2d

732

N/A

passmark_g3d

12,534

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

5,368

N/A

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

Examining the test results for GeForce Arc A750 and Radeon NVIDIA CMP 90HX, a story of competitive capability appears. Neither option dominates reliably throughout most titles. This trading of victories suggests underlying equality. Buyers have a actual decision with these options. Each graphics cards provide solid rendering performance.

Over focusing on minor FPS improvements, potential buyers can consider alternative elements. TDP, fan noise, build quality, and warranty coverage frequently count larger than slight benchmark deltas. Such factors could affect the choice. Evaluate beyond merely scores. This complete picture is important.

To summarize, this comparison between GeForce Arc A750 and Radeon NVIDIA CMP 90HX concludes in a near stalemate. Benchmark differences are minor and unlikely to influence practical gaming. Center your choice on price, driver considerations, and individual feature preferences. Either are capable options. This balance is true.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A750

CMP 90HX

Core Specs

Shading Units

3,584

6,400 +78.6%

Shaders

3,584

6,400 +78.6%

TMUs

224

200 -10.7%

ROPs

112

80 -28.6%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

448

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2050 MHz

1500 MHz

Boost Clock

2400 MHz

1710 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1188 MHz 19 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

10 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

10,240 +25.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

256 bit

320 bit

Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s

760.3 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

16 MB

5 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

268.8 GPixel/s

136.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

537.6 GTexel/s

342.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

17.20 TFLOPS

21.89 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

342.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

21.89 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

50 +78.6%

Tensor Cores

—

200

XMX Cores

448

—

Power

TDP

225 W

320 W

TDP (W)

225

320 +42.2%

Suggested PSU

550 W

700 W

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

2x 8-pin

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-512

GA102

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 7)

Mining GPUs

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

21,700 million

28,300 million

Die Size

406 mm²

628 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

53.4M / mm²

45.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Length

—

285 mm 11.2 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 1.0 x4

Other

Launch Price

289 USD

—

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

—

Successor

Battlemage

—

View Arc A750 Details View CMP 90HX Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A750

CMP 90HX

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons