NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains two shared benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and the NVIDIA CMP 70HX, and the margin of victory is substantial in both cases.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 points against the CMP 70HX’s 25,135 points. That is a delta of 472.4%, meaning the mobile part delivers more than five times the compute performance in this workload. This is not a close contest by any measure. The CMP 70HX trails by such a wide margin that the result falls outside the typical range of generational improvements; it represents a completely different performance class.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the gap narrows somewhat but remains decisive. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 139,213 points, while the CMP 70HX manages 35,817 points. The delta here is 288.7%. While the CMP 70HX closes a portion of the relative gap compared to OpenCL, it still trails by nearly four times the score. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins both head-to-head benchmarks, giving it a clean 2-0 record in the shared test suite.

Looking at the broader database context, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile holds an average benchmark score of 35,435, which places it at the 80th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (average score 35,520, delta -0.2%), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35,860, -1.2%), the NVIDIA A2 (34,690, +2.1%), and the NVIDIA T1000 (36,289, -2.4%). These deltas are all within a few percentage points, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits in a tightly contested performance band where small margins separate competitors.

The CMP 70HX, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 30,476, placing it at the 75th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla M60 (30,490, 0.0%), the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (30,433, +0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30,095, +1.3%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29,945, +1.8%). The CMP 70HX is effectively tied with its nearest rival, the Tesla M60, and holds only a narrow edge over the others. This places the CMP 70HX in a lower performance tier than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, with a gap of roughly 5,000 points in average score.

The data also shows individual benchmark results beyond the shared tests. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile records a Passmark G3D score of 24,004, a Passmark GPU Compute score of 10,101, and Passmark DirectX scores of 151 (DX10), 237 (DX11), 102 (DX12), and 259 (DX9). Its 2D score is 981. The CMP 70HX has no recorded Passmark results in the database, so comparisons are limited to the Geekbench tests.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins with a score of 143,870 against the CMP 70HX’s 25,135, a delta of 472.4%.

Q: How large is the Vulkan performance gap?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 139,213 in Geekbench Vulkan, while the CMP 70HX scores 35,817. The delta is 288.7% in favor of the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

Q: Does the CMP 70HX win any benchmark in the shared test set?

A: No. The head-to-head results show the CMP 70HX losing both Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. The wins tally is 2 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and 0 for the CMP 70HX.

Q: How do the two GPUs rank relative to all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile, while the CMP 70HX sits at the 75th percentile. Their average benchmark scores are 35,435 and 30,476, respectively.

Q: What are the closest rivals for each GPU?

A: For the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, the closest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 with an average score of 35,520 and a delta of -0.2%. For the CMP 70HX, the closest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla M60 with an average score of 30,490 and a delta of 0.0%.

Q: Does the CMP 70HX have any display outputs?

A: No. The CMP 70HX has no display outputs, consistent with its mining-purpose design. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has display outputs described as portable device dependent.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins decisively in every benchmark category where both GPUs have recorded data. In Geekbench OpenCL, its 472.4% lead indicates a massive advantage in general-purpose compute workloads that leverage OpenCL. In Geekbench Vulkan, the 288.7% lead shows strong graphics and compute performance through the Vulkan API. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also holds a higher average benchmark score (35,435 vs. 30,476) and a higher percentile ranking (80th vs. 75th).

The CMP 70HX has no benchmark wins in the head-to-head comparison. Its only recorded scores are the two Geekbench results, both of which are far below the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The database shows no test where the CMP 70HX outperforms its mobile counterpart. However, the CMP 70HX does have a niche: it is a mining-specific card with no display outputs, which means it is not designed for gaming or workstation graphics tasks. Its performance profile, while lower, is consistent with a dedicated compute device rather than a general-purpose graphics card.

For use cases, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear choice for any workload requiring graphics output, general compute, or API-based rendering. The CMP 70HX, with its lack of display outputs and lower compute scores, is suited only for headless compute operations, and even there it is substantially slower.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a GB205 chip on a 5 nm process from TSMC, while the CMP 70HX uses a GA104 chip on an 8 nm process from Samsung. The transistor counts differ significantly: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die (density of 118.3M per mm²), while the CMP 70HX has 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die (density of 44.4M per mm²).

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CMP 70HX has 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 608.3 GB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds also differ: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost of 1447 MHz, while the CMP 70HX has a base of 1365 MHz and a boost of 1395 MHz. Memory clocks are 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for the CMP 70HX.

The compute units differ in scale. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The CMP 70HX has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 30 RT cores, and 120 tensor cores. Pixel rates are 115.8 GPixel/s versus 89.28 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 266.2 GTexel/s versus 167.4 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 17.04 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, while the CMP 70HX achieves 10.71 TFLOPS in both.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors. The CMP 70HX has no listed TDP, is dual-slot, uses a single 12-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 200 W. The CMP 70HX measures 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no listed dimensions. The bus interface differs as well: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus PCIe 1.0 x4 for the CMP 70HX.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is generational. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, belonging to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. The CMP 70HX is built on Ampere architecture and belongs to the Mining GPUs generation. The process node is 5 nm (TSMC) for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus 8 nm (Samsung) for the CMP 70HX. The transistor density tells the story: 118.3M per mm² for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus 44.4M per mm² for the CMP 70HX, reflecting both the newer node and the denser design.

The memory types differ: GDDR7 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus GDDR6X for the CMP 70HX. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has more RT cores (46 vs. 30) and more tensor cores (184 vs. 120), indicating a more capable ray tracing and AI processing pipeline. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also has a higher boost clock (1447 MHz vs. 1395 MHz) despite a lower base clock (847 MHz vs. 1365 MHz), suggesting a wider dynamic range.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so the API feature set is identical. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is marked as Active in production status, while the CMP 70HX is End-of-life. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a release date of February 28, 2025, while the CMP 70HX has no recorded release date. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile lists its predecessor as GeForce 40 Mobile, while the CMP 70HX has no predecessor or successor listed.

The Verdict

The data points to a one-sided comparison. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms the NVIDIA CMP 70HX in both shared benchmarks by margins of 472.4% (OpenCL) and 288.7% (Vulkan). Its average benchmark score is 35,435 versus 30,476, and it ranks higher at the 80th percentile versus the 75th. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also carries more memory (12 GB vs. 8 GB), a newer memory type (GDDR7 vs. GDDR6X), higher bandwidth (672.0 GB/s vs. 608.3 GB/s), more shading units (5888 vs. 3840), and a more advanced architecture (Blackwell 2.0 vs. Ampere) on a smaller process node (5 nm vs. 8 nm).

The CMP 70HX has no recorded wins in any shared benchmark. Its only advantages are a higher base clock (1365 MHz vs. 847 MHz), a wider memory bus (256-bit vs. 192-bit), and a larger physical footprint (267 mm length vs. no listed dimensions). None of these translate into a performance lead in the recorded data.

Who should pick which? The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the choice for any user needing graphics output, modern API support, high compute throughput, or ray tracing capability. It is an active product with a clear successor lineage. The CMP 70HX, being end-of-life and lacking display outputs, is only relevant for headless compute tasks, and even then it is vastly slower. The benchmark data offers no scenario where the CMP 70HX comes out ahead. For anyone choosing between these two, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only sensible option based on the recorded measurements.