NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and NVIDIA CMP 70HX occupy different corners of the GPU landscape, with the former serving as a fully-featured consumer graphics card and the latter built strictly for compute workloads without display outputs. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds an average benchmark score of 31,087 against the CMP 70HX’s 30,476, a lead of roughly 2%. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s advantage is far more pronounced in individual compute tests, where it outperforms the CMP 70HX by margins ranging from 49.9% to a staggering 692.8%. While both cards sit near the 75th percentile of all GPUs, their architectural differences and intended use cases make them suitable for entirely different buyers.

The Verdict

The data makes the choice straightforward for most users: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior card in every measured benchmark. It wins both head-to-head tests, with a 692.8% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL and a 49.9% edge in Geekbench Vulkan. For anyone needing a general-purpose GPU with display outputs, modern API support, and high compute throughput, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only rational pick from this comparison. Its 76th percentile ranking among all GPUs slightly edges out the CMP 70HX’s 75th percentile, confirming its overall standing.

The CMP 70HX, however, is not without a niche. As a mining-specific part with no display outputs and a PCIe 1.0 x4 interface, it is designed for dedicated compute environments where raw throughput per card matters more than feature set. Its average score of 30,476 is remarkably close to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 31,087, differing by less than 2%. This means that in workloads that do not leverage the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s architectural advantages—such as certain memory-bound or simple parallel tasks—the CMP 70HX could deliver comparable aggregate performance at a potentially lower system cost. However, the data cannot quantify that cost advantage, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s benchmark dominance makes it the safer recommendation for all but the most specialized mining operations.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on different architectures, nodes, and chip designs, which explains their divergent benchmark profiles. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 121.1 million per square millimeter, reflecting the advanced manufacturing node. In contrast, the CMP 70HX uses the GA104 chip on Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors spread across a larger 392 mm² die. The density drops to 44.4 million per square millimeter, a consequence of the older, less dense process node.

These architectural differences translate into massive compute disparities. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER boasts 8,448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines, alongside 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores. The CMP 70HX offers 3,840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has more than double the shading units and TMUs, and more than double the RT and tensor core counts. This is reflected in the raw throughput numbers: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance, while the CMP 70HX manages only 10.71 TFLOPS in both precisions—a fourfold difference.

Memory configurations also differ significantly. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes with 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, achieving 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The CMP 70HX has 8 GB of GDDR6X on the same 256-bit bus, but its bandwidth drops to 608.3 GB/s due to lower effective memory clocks (19 Gbps vs. 21 Gbps). Clock speeds favor the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER as well, with a base of 2340 MHz and boost of 2610 MHz, versus the CMP 70HX’s 1365 MHz base and 1395 MHz boost. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also has a higher pixel rate (250.6 GPixel/s vs. 89.28 GPixel/s) and texture rate (689.0 GTexel/s vs. 167.4 GTexel/s), confirming its dominance in rasterization and texture-heavy workloads.

Feature sets diverge sharply. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot card with a 16-pin power connector, a 600 W suggested PSU, PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and display outputs including HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a. The CMP 70HX is a dual-slot card with a 12-pin connector, a 200 W suggested PSU, PCIe 1.0 x4 interface, and no display outputs whatsoever. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level compatibility is not a differentiator. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER measures 310 mm in length, while the CMP 70HX is shorter at 267 mm.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unequivocal. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 against the CMP 70HX’s 25,135, a delta of 692.8%. This is the single largest margin in any test, driven by the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 4x FP32 throughput advantage and its higher memory bandwidth. Such a result indicates that the CMP 70HX is severely limited in general-purpose compute tasks that are not specifically optimized for its mining-oriented design.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the gap narrows considerably but remains decisive. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 53,683, while the CMP 70HX achieves 35,817, a 49.9% lead for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The smaller delta suggests that Vulkan’s lower-level API reduces some of the architectural overhead differences, but the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s superior shader count and clock speeds still carry the day. This result also hints that the CMP 70HX is not entirely without compute capability—it can hold its own better in API-optimized workloads than in raw OpenCL throughput.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins both head-to-head tests, giving it a 2-0 record. The CMP 70HX records no wins. Beyond these direct comparisons, the average benchmark scores reinforce the trend: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 31,087 average is 611 points higher than the CMP 70HX’s 30,476. However, it is importantly the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s average is pulled down by low scores in PassMark DirectX tests (ranging from 119 to 360), while its PassMark G3D score of 31,811 and G2D score of 1,225 are strong. The CMP 70HX has no PassMark scores in the data, so its average is based solely on the two Geekbench results.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16, while the CMP 70HX offers 10.71 TFLOPS in both precisions. This fourfold difference explains the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 692.8% lead in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: Can the CMP 70HX be used for gaming or display output?

A: No. The CMP 70HX has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for any workload requiring a monitor. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, includes 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: How do the two cards compare in memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth on a 256-bit bus. The CMP 70HX has 8 GB of GDDR6X with 608.3 GB/s bandwidth on the same 256-bit bus. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads in both capacity and bandwidth.

Q: What is the performance percentile of each card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, while the CMP 70HX ranks in the 75th percentile. Despite this near-identical percentile, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s average score of 31,087 edges out the CMP 70HX’s 30,476.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the CMP 70HX is competitive?

A: In Geekbench Vulkan, the CMP 70HX scores 35,817 against the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 53,683, a 49.9% gap. While this is a smaller margin than OpenCL, the CMP 70HX still loses decisively. No benchmark in the data shows a CMP 70HX win.

Q: What are the physical differences between the cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length and 140 mm in height, with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 600 W suggested PSU. The CMP 70HX is dual-slot, 267 mm long and 112 mm tall, with a 1x 12-pin connector and a 200 W suggested PSU.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every measurable category from the data. Its 2-0 head-to-head record, higher average score, and superior architecture make it the clear choice for any application requiring general-purpose compute, graphics rendering, or display output. The card’s 16 GB memory capacity and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth position it well for large datasets, while its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles compute-heavy tasks with ease. The triple-slot cooler and 600 W suggested PSU indicate a higher power envelope, but the performance payoff is evident in the benchmark results.

The CMP 70HX’s wins are more contextual than benchmark-based. Its dual-slot design and 200 W suggested PSU indicate lower system power demands, which could be advantageous in dense mining rigs. The PCIe 1.0 x4 interface, while slow for general use, may be sufficient for mining workloads that do not require high host-card communication. The card’s 75th percentile ranking shows it is not a slouch in aggregate performance, and its average score of 30,476 is within 2% of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. For workloads that do not stress the architectural differences—particularly those that are memory-bandwidth-bound rather than shader-bound—the CMP 70HX could approach the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s performance. However, the data provides no benchmark where the CMP 70HX actually wins, so any such advantage remains speculative.

In summary, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior product by every metric in the FACT PACK. The CMP 70HX’s only claim to relevance is its specialized mining design and lower power requirements, but even those advantages cannot overcome the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s massive compute lead in the tests measured. Buyers seeking a versatile, high-performance GPU should choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER without hesitation; those running dedicated mining operations may consider the CMP 70HX for its physical and power profile, but they will sacrifice significant performance in the process.