GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA CMP 50HX

CORE STATE TU102
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1545 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400 4 GB

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
56,135
17,320
geekbench_vulkan
47,445
16,263

Analysis: NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX and Radeon NVIDIA T400 4 GB offer almost identical graphics frame rates in our head-to-head evaluation. The score deltas between them often sit below single digits, positioning any a reasonable selection. The parity renders the determination multifaceted. Alternative considerations become especially important. Value typically influences the decision.

If frame rates is extremely matched, cost and capabilities turn the primary variables. Examine real-time ray tracing quality, DLSS/FSR implementation, thermal requirements, and platform quality when selecting between GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX and Radeon NVIDIA T400 4 GB. Such elements should influence the decision. Think broadly. The complete perspective matters.

As opposed to fixating on marginal frame rate improvements, potential users might consider secondary elements. TDP, fan noise, construction, and warranty coverage usually count larger than marginal FPS deltas. Such considerations should affect the decision. Consider further than merely frame rates. The full value proposition matters.

When those uncertain between GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX and Radeon NVIDIA T400 4 GB, remain comfortable that any option delivers comparable graphics capability. The benchmark figures supports nil decisive winner. Reach your determination on additional considerations and enjoy solid visual performance either way. Each are champions in their respective regard. Go with confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
CMP 50HX
T400 4 GB
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,584
384 -89.3%
Shaders
3,584
384 -89.3%
TMUs
192
24 -87.5%
ROPs
80
16 -80.0%
SM Count
56
6 -89.3%
Clocks
Base Clock
1350 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
10 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
10,240
4,096 -60.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
320 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
560.0 GB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
5 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
11.07 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
346.1 GFLOPS (1:32)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
22.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
56
Tensor Cores
448
Power
TDP
250 W
30 W
TDP (W)
250
30 -88.0%
Suggested PSU
600 W
200 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Turing
Turing
GPU Name
TU102
TU117
Generation
Mining GPUs
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
12 nm
12 nm
Transistors
18,600 million
4,700 million
Die Size
754 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
24.7M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
116 mm 4.6 inches
Outputs
No outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View CMP 50HX Details View T400 4 GB Details