GPU Comparison
RADEON
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
CORE STATE
Navi 31
VRAM
16 GB
CLOCK SPEED
2245 MHz
TDP
260 W
BUS WIDTH
256 bit
ARCHITECTURE
RDNA 3.0
PROCESS
5 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2023
VS
GEFORCE
A2
CORE STATE
GA107
VRAM
16 GB
CLOCK SPEED
1770 MHz
TDP
60 W
BUS WIDTH
128 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Ampere
PROCESS
8 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2021
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
geekbench_opencl
geekbench_vulkan
passmark_directx_10
passmark_directx_11
passmark_directx_12
passmark_directx_9
passmark_g2d
passmark_g3d
passmark_gpu_compute
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs NVIDIA A2
In this graphics card showdown, AMD RX 7900 GPU demonstrates its leadership decisively. If you're streaming at 1440p, AMD RX 7900 GPU dependably exceeds NVIDIA A2 by significant gaps. The benchmark margin expands particularly more at increased quality levels. The video card manages intensive scenarios with ease. The architectural advantages are clear.
In conclusion, AMD RX 7900 GPU offers the more capable option in this comparison. Its performance superiority validate consideration for buyers building a capable rendering PC. Even though NVIDIA A2 features its advantages, this score numbers undeniably favors AMD RX 7900 GPU. Reach your selection considering this. This gaming difference is significant sufficiently to matter.
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
RX 7900 GRE
A2
Core Specs
Shading Units
5,120
1,280
-75.0%
Shaders
5,120
1,280
-75.0%
TMUs
320
40
-87.5%
ROPs
160
32
-80.0%
Compute Units
80
—
SM Count
—
10
Clocks
Base Clock
1287 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
1770 MHz
Game Clock
1880 MHz
—
Shader Clock
1880 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
18 Gbps effective
1563 MHz
12.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
16,384
0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
200.1 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
2 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
—
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
56.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
45.98 TFLOPS
4.531 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,436.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
70.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
91.96 TFLOPS (2:1)
4.531 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
80
10
-87.5%
Tensor Cores
—
40
Matrix Cores
160
—
Power
TDP
260 W
60 W
TDP (W)
260
60
-76.9%
Suggested PSU
600 W
250 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 31
GA107
Codename
Plum Bonito
—
Generation
Navi III
(RX 7000)
Workstation Ampere
(Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
8,700 million
Die Size
529 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
109.1M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
—
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
—
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
276 mm
10.9 inches
—
Height
110 mm
4.3 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
—
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II
Quadro Turing
Successor
Navi IV
Workstation Ada