Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA T600 Comparison

The benchmark data places the NVIDIA T600 and Intel UHD Graphics P750 in nearly the same overall performance tier, but the T600 achieves this with a vastly different architectural approach and a decisive victory in the only directly comparable test. The Intel P750 is an integrated processor graphics solution that trades heavily on system memory, while the T600 is a discrete workstation card with dedicated VRAM. In the single head-to-head benchmark available, the T600 outperforms the P750 by 325.3%, a margin that defines their respective use cases.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA T600 is significantly faster, scoring 27,875 compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 6,554. This represents a 325.3% performance advantage for the T600.

Q: What is the performance percentiles of each GPU relative to all other GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA T600 sits in the 39th percentile, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 sits in the 38th percentile. Despite the T600's massive lead in the OpenCL test, both cards are nearly tied in their overall standing among all GPUs.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have, and what type is it?

A: The NVIDIA T600 has 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and relies on the system's main memory.

Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for these two cards?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has a TDP of 15 W, making it a very low-power integrated solution. The NVIDIA T600 has a TDP of 40 W, which is still low for a discrete card but more than double the Intel chip's draw.

Q: Are these GPUs still in production?

A: No, both the NVIDIA T600 and the Intel UHD Graphics P750 are listed as "End-of-life" in their production status.

Q: What are the closest performance rivals for each card based on average benchmark scores?

A: The NVIDIA T600's closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M, which has an average score of 7,023, just 0.2% behind the T600. The Intel P750's closest rival is the AMD Radeon R7 M460, which has an average score of 6,612, sitting 0.9% ahead of the Intel chip.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA T600 and Intel UHD Graphics P750 are built on fundamentally different foundations. The T600 is a discrete GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features the TU117 chip, which contains 4,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 23.5M per mm². In contrast, the Intel P750 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the "Generation 12.1" architecture, built on Intel's 14 nm+++ process. It uses the Rocket Lake chip, though Intel does not list transistor count or die size for this part.

The functional block configurations differ substantially. The NVIDIA T600 has 640 shading units, 40 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 render output units (ROPs). The Intel P750 has only 256 shading units but a higher count of 64 TMUs and the same 32 ROPs as the T600. This means the Intel chip has a higher texture fill rate potential per clock, but the T600's higher clock speeds and shader count give it a significant edge in raw compute.

Clock speeds also diverge. The T600 has a base clock of 735 MHz and a boost clock of 1,335 MHz. The Intel P750 has a much lower base clock of 350 MHz but a similar boost clock of 1,300 MHz. The T600's dedicated memory subsystem runs at 1,250 MHz with 10 Gbps effective transfer speed, while the P750's memory clock is listed simply as "System Shared."

The power and physical characteristics are also different. The T600 is a single-slot card with no power connectors and a suggested power supply of 200 W. It draws 40 W TDP. The Intel P750 is an IGP with a 15 W TDP and no slot width, power connector, or suggested PSU requirements, as it is integrated into the motherboard. The T600 connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, while the P750 uses a Ring Bus interface.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only benchmark where both GPUs have comparable data is Geekbench OpenCL, and this test produces a one-sided result. The NVIDIA T600 scores 27,875 points, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 6,554 points. The T600 wins by a delta of 325.3%, making it more than four times faster in this compute-oriented workload.

This outcome is not surprising given the architectural data. The T600's FP32 compute is listed at 1.709 TFLOPS, while the P750 is rated at 665.6 GFLOPS. The T600's dedicated 160.0 GB/s memory bandwidth versus the P750's "System Dependent" bandwidth further explains the gap. In a synthetic OpenCL test that often stresses memory and raw shader throughput, the discrete card's advantages are amplified.

The T600 also has a higher average benchmark score across all tests, at 7,035, compared to the P750's 6,554. However, it is importantly the T600's average includes multiple tests (Passmark DirectX 9/10/11/12, G2D, G3D, and GPU Compute), while the P750's average is based solely on its single Geekbench OpenCL score. The T600's individual scores range from 25 in Passmark DirectX 12 to 6479 in Passmark G3D, showing it performs best in 3D graphics workloads rather than compute-heavy DirectX tests.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification field. The process node is a clear divergence: the T600 uses a 12 nm process from TSMC, while the P750 uses Intel's 14 nm+++ process. The T600 has a listed transistor count of 4,700 million and a die size of 200 mm², whereas the P750 has no data for either field.

Memory is the most significant difference. The T600 has 4 GB of GDDR6 with a 128-bit bus and 160.0 GB/s bandwidth. The P750 has System Shared memory, with System Shared type, bus width, and bandwidth described as "System Dependent." This makes the P750's performance highly dependent on the host system's RAM configuration.

Compute resources also differ. The T600 has 640 shading units and 40 TMUs, while the P750 has 256 shading units and 64 TMUs. Both share 32 ROPs. The T600's pixel rate is 42.72 GPixel/s, slightly higher than the P750's 41.60 GPixel/s. However, the P750 has a higher texture rate at 83.20 GTexel/s compared to the T600's 53.40 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specs are distinct as well. The T600 is rated at 40 W TDP, while the P750 is rated at 15 W TDP. The T600 requires a 200 W suggested PSU and is a single-slot card with 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The P750 has no power connector, no slot width, and its display outputs are "Motherboard Dependent." The T600 uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface, while the P750 uses a Ring Bus.

Both GPUs support the same API levels: DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has ray tracing or tensor cores listed. The FP16 performance is also similar in ratio, with the T600 at 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1) and the P750 at 1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1).

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the NVIDIA T600 is the superior choice for any workload that leverages dedicated graphics memory and raw compute throughput. Its 325.3% lead in Geekbench OpenCL is decisive, and its dedicated 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 160.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a substantial advantage over the P750's system-shared memory. The T600's higher FP32 performance (1.709 TFLOPS vs 665.6 GFLOPS) and larger shader count (640 vs 256) make it the better option for GPU-accelerated tasks.

The Intel UHD Graphics P750, however, has its own place. Its 15 W TDP is less than half of the T600's 40 W, making it an extremely efficient integrated solution. It also has a higher texture rate (83.20 GTexel/s vs 53.40 GTexel/s) and more TMUs (64 vs 40), which could benefit certain texture-heavy workloads if memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck. The P750's average benchmark score of 6,554 is only 6.8% lower than the T600's 7,035, suggesting that in some non-OpenCL tasks, the gap narrows considerably.

For a workstation or desktop system where a discrete GPU is an option, the T600 is the clear pick. For an ultra-low-power integrated solution where adding a discrete card is not possible, the P750 is the only choice.

Where Each One Wins

NVIDIA T600 Wins:

The T600 wins in compute-heavy workloads, as evidenced by its 325.3% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL. It also wins in any scenario requiring dedicated memory, as its 4 GB GDDR6 with 160.0 GB/s bandwidth eliminates the "System Dependent" bottleneck of the P750. The T600's higher FP32 throughput (1.709 TFLOPS) and more shading units (640) make it better suited for 3D rendering, CAD, and scientific computing tasks. Its PCIe 3.0 x16 interface provides dedicated bandwidth to the host system, and its 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups without relying on motherboard capabilities.

Intel UHD Graphics P750 Wins:

The P750 wins in power efficiency, with a 15 W TDP that is 62.5% lower than the T600's 40 W. It also wins in texture throughput, offering 83.20 GTexel/s compared to the T600's 53.40 GTexel/s. The P750's 64 TMUs give it a theoretical advantage in texture-heavy workloads, provided memory bandwidth is sufficient. As an IGP, it requires no additional power connectors, no dedicated slot, and no suggested PSU, making it the only option for systems where discrete GPU installation is not feasible. Its lower average benchmark score (6,554 vs 7,035) suggests it performs within 6.8% of the T600 in overall average, but its single data point means this comparison is incomplete. The P750's "Motherboard Dependent" display outputs mean it can adapt to whatever ports the motherboard provides, which is a flexibility advantage in compact or embedded builds.