Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the two products compared in this database entry?

A: The comparison is between the Intel UHD Graphics P750, an integrated graphics processor from Intel based on the Rocket Lake chip, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, a discrete server GPU from NVIDIA based on the GB202 chip.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured on Intel's 14 nm+++ process, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is built on TSMC's 5 nm process. The NVIDIA chip contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 122.9M per mm².

Q: How do their benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has an average benchmark score of 6554 in the Geekbench OpenCL test, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has an average score of 5996 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. These are different benchmark suites, so direct cross-test comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

Q: What is the memory configuration for each GPU?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the production statuses of these two products?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is marked as end-of-life, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is listed as active with a release date of March 17, 2025.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has a TDP of 15 W, whereas the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a TDP of 600 W and requires a 1000 W suggested power supply with a single 16-pin power connector.

The Verdict

The data in this database presents two products serving entirely different segments. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is an integrated graphics solution with 256 shading units, a 350 MHz base clock, and a 1300 MHz boost clock. It is built for low-power, embedded, or basic display workloads, as evidenced by its 15 W TDP and system shared memory.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a professional server-grade accelerator with 24,064 shading units, 188 ray tracing cores, and 752 tensor cores. Its 96 GB GDDR7 memory with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 126.0 TFLOPS of FP32 performance position it for compute-heavy server workloads.

For users needing general-purpose graphics output, light acceleration, or a basic display adapter, the Intel part suffices, given its end-of-life status and modest capabilities. For professionals running AI inference, rendering, or high-performance computing tasks, the NVIDIA part is the only viable choice based on the specification gap. The benchmark scores cannot be compared head-to-head because they come from different test suites, and the head-to-head benchmark list in the database is empty, meaning no direct comparative measurements exist.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs, and the win counts reflect this: winsA is 0 and winsB is 0. Each product was evaluated under different testing methodologies: the Intel UHD Graphics P750 was measured using Geekbench OpenCL, scoring 6554, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server was measured using 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scoring 5996.

When examining nearest rivals for context, the Intel UHD Graphics P750 sits very close to its competitors. It trails the AMD Radeon HD 7730M by 0.4% (that rival scores 6581), beats the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M by 0.6% (6513), trails the AMD Radeon R7 M460 by 0.9% (6612), and beats the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M by 0.9% (6493). The Intel part's percentile rank among all GPUs is 38.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server shows a similar clustering with its nearest rivals. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M by 0.1% (6000), trails the AMD Radeon RX 6400 by 0.1% (6001), beats the AMD FirePro W4100 by 0.2% (5987), and beats the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M by 0.2% (5986). Its percentile rank among all GPUs is 34.

The specification gap between the two products is enormous, but without shared benchmark data, the database cannot quantify that gap in performance terms.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measured specification. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has a base clock of 350 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server runs at 1590 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost. Memory speeds also diverge: the Intel part uses system shared memory, while the NVIDIA part uses 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Shading unit counts differ dramatically: 256 for Intel versus 24,064 for NVIDIA. Texture mapping units are 64 versus 752, and render output units are 32 versus 192. The NVIDIA GPU includes 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores, while the Intel GPU has none listed.

Pixel rate for the Intel part is 41.60 GPixel/s, while the NVIDIA part achieves 502.5 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 83.20 GTexel/s versus 1,968.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 665.6 GFLOPS versus 126.0 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1 ratio) versus 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Power requirements are starkly different: 15 W TDP for Intel versus 600 W for NVIDIA. The Intel part is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface and motherboard-dependent display outputs. The NVIDIA part is dual-slot, uses PCIe 5.0 x16, has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, and measures 267 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm.

Architecture Differences

The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is based on the Rocket Lake chip with Generation 12.1 architecture, produced on Intel's 14 nm+++ process. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses the GB202 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, produced on TSMC's 5 nm process.

The NVIDIA GPU's die contains 92,200 million transistors across a 750 mm² die, achieving 122.9M transistors per mm². The Intel part has no transistor count or die size listed in the database.

The NVIDIA GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The NVIDIA part's memory subsystem is entirely discrete: 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel part relies on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

NVIDIA's architecture includes dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores, which the Intel integrated solution does not list. The NVIDIA part also has a much larger shading unit count, reflecting its server-class compute orientation.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel UHD Graphics P750 wins in power efficiency, with a 15 W TDP compared to the NVIDIA part's 600 W. It also wins on form factor, being an integrated GPU with no slot width requirement, whereas the NVIDIA part is dual-slot. For systems needing basic display output or light acceleration without additional power delivery, the Intel part is the practical choice.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server wins on every raw compute specification in the database. Its 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 performance is dramatically higher than the Intel part's 665.6 GFLOPS. The 96 GB GDDR7 memory with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth is suited for large datasets, while the Intel part's system shared memory is limited by system dependency.

The NVIDIA GPU's 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores enable workloads that the Intel part cannot handle, such as ray-traced rendering and AI acceleration. The NVIDIA part's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and dedicated display outputs (4x DisplayPort 2.1b) also provide connectivity options that the Intel part's motherboard-dependent outputs cannot match.

For server deployments, the NVIDIA part's active production status and 2025 release date indicate current availability, while the Intel part is end-of-life. The NVIDIA predecessor is listed as Server Hopper, and its successor is Server Rubin, showing an active product roadmap. The Intel part has no listed predecessor or successor.

In terms of benchmark positioning, the Intel part's percentile rank of 38 places it slightly above the NVIDIA part's rank of 34, but this does not account for the different test suites used. Each GPU wins in its intended context: the Intel part for low-power integrated needs, the NVIDIA part for high-performance server compute.