Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data includes only one directly comparable test between these two processors: Geekbench OpenCL. In that workload, the NVIDIA Quadro P5000 scores 52,509, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 manages 6,554. That is a delta of 701.2% in favor of the Quadro P5000. To put it plainly, the discrete workstation card delivers roughly eight times the compute throughput of the integrated graphics solution in this particular OpenCL scenario.

The Quadro P5000 further demonstrates its strength across its full benchmark suite. In Passmark G3D, it records 12,634 points, while its Passmark GPU Compute score sits at 6,508. DirectX 9 workloads yield 170 points, DirectX 11 yields 102, and DirectX 10 yields 77. The card also posts 674 in Passmark G2D, 44 in DirectX 12, and 1,330 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its Geekbench Vulkan result is 6,342.

The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has only one benchmark entry in the database, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 6,554. No DirectX, Vulkan, or compute-specific tests are recorded for it. As such, the head-to-head comparison is necessarily limited to that single shared workload. Still, the margin is decisive: the Quadro P5000 leads by 701.2%, a gap that dwarfs any rival deltas seen in either processor's nearest-comparison group.

Context from the nearest rivals reinforces the scale of that lead. The Quadro P5000's closest competitors in average benchmark score are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M at 8,040 (0% delta), the GTX 650 Ti at 8,053 (-0.2%), the GTX 650 Ti Boost at 8,067 (-0.3%), and the NVIDIA GRID K2 at 8,080 (-0.5%). The Quadro P5000's own average benchmark score is 8,039, placing it at the 41st percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel UHD Graphics P750, by contrast, sits at the 38th percentile with an average score of 6,554, flanked by the AMD Radeon HD 7730M at 6,581 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M at 6,513 (0.6%), the AMD Radeon R7 M460 at 6,612 (-0.9%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M at 6,493 (0.9%).

What the numbers show is not a close contest. The Quadro P5000 outperforms the UHD P750 in the only shared test by an order of magnitude, and its broader benchmark profile places it in a different performance class entirely. The Intel part's percentile ranking, 38th versus 41st, is deceptively close; the actual scores reveal a chasm between them.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The NVIDIA Quadro P5000 uses the GP104 chip built on Pascal architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 16 nm process. It integrates 7,200 million transistors on a 314 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 22.9 million per square millimeter. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses the Rocket Lake chip under Intel's Generation 12.1 architecture, fabricated by Intel on a 14 nm+++ process. The database lists no transistor count, die size, or density for the Intel part.

The computing resources diverge sharply. The Quadro P5000 carries 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The UHD P750 has 256 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. That is a 10-to-1 advantage in shader count for NVIDIA, a 2.5-to-1 lead in TMUs, and a 2-to-1 lead in ROPs. The clock behavior also differs: the Quadro P5000 runs at 1,607 MHz base and 1,733 MHz boost, while the Intel part operates at 350 MHz base and 1,300 MHz boost. The NVIDIA card's higher shader count combined with its higher boost clock explains the overwhelming compute gap.

Memory architecture is another major differentiator. The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of GDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 288.5 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 1,127 MHz, which translates to 9 Gbps effective. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses system-shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM; bus width, type, and bandwidth are all listed as system dependent. This is typical for an integrated graphics processor, but it places a hard ceiling on memory-intensive workloads.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce the performance hierarchy. The Quadro P5000 achieves 110.9 GPixel/s and 277.3 GTexel/s, while the UHD P750 manages 41.60 GPixel/s and 83.20 GTexel/s. Floating-point throughput tells the same story: the NVIDIA part delivers 8.873 TFLOPS of FP32, versus 665.6 GFLOPS for Intel. Notably, the Intel part offers 1,331.2 GFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, while the Quadro P5000 lists only 138.6 GFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:64 ratio. This means the Intel integrated GPU is comparatively better suited to half-precision workloads, though its absolute FP16 figure still falls below the Quadro's FP32 output.

Power and physical design diverge as well. The Quadro P5000 is a dual-slot card rated at 180 W TDP, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W power supply. It measures 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height. The UHD P750 is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and no listed dimensions, as it relies on the host motherboard for power delivery and display output.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion: the NVIDIA Quadro P5000 is the far more capable processor in every recorded metric where comparison is possible. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 701.2% higher than the Intel UHD Graphics P750's, and its broader benchmark suite shows strong performance across DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12, plus Vulkan and compute workloads. The Intel part has only one recorded benchmark and cannot match the Quadro's throughput in any measured category.

Who should choose the Quadro P5000? Anyone whose workload involves DirectX 11 or 12 applications, Vulkan rendering, or OpenCL compute tasks. The card's 16 GB of GDDR5X memory and 288.5 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large datasets and high-resolution textures. Its 8.873 TFLOPS of FP32 performance places it well ahead of typical integrated solutions. The 41st percentile ranking among all GPUs, while not elite, reflects a capable mid-to-upper-tier discrete card.

Who should choose the Intel UHD Graphics P750? Users with minimal graphics demands, particularly those who need basic display output and modest compute acceleration within a low-power 15 W envelope. Its FP16 throughput of 1,331.2 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio is the one area where it shows a relative architectural strength, and its 38th percentile ranking indicates it performs near the level of older mobile discrete GPUs such as the GTX 670M and GT 555M. But for any serious rendering, gaming, or compute workload, the Quadro P5000 is the only rational pick based on the recorded data.

The launch MSRP of the Quadro P5000 was 2,499 USD. The Intel part has no recorded launch price, reflecting its role as an integrated component rather than a standalone product.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors in the database:

• Chip: GP104 (NVIDIA) versus Rocket Lake (Intel)
• Architecture: Pascal versus Generation 12.1
• Generation: Quadro Pascal (Px000) versus HD Graphics-W (Rocket Lake)
• Process node: 16 nm (TSMC) versus 14 nm+++ (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC versus Intel
• Transistors: 7,200 million versus not listed
• Die size: 314 mm² versus not listed
• Transistor density: 22.9M / mm² versus not listed
• Base clock: 1,607 MHz versus 350 MHz
• Boost clock: 1,733 MHz versus 1,300 MHz
• Memory clock: 1,127 MHz (9 Gbps effective) versus system shared
• Memory size: 16 GB GDDR5X versus system shared
• Memory type: GDDR5X versus system shared
• Memory bus width: 256 bit versus system shared
• Memory bandwidth: 288.5 GB/s versus system dependent
• Shading units: 2,560 versus 256
• TMUs: 160 versus 64
• ROPs: 64 versus 32
• Pixel rate: 110.9 GPixel/s versus 41.60 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 277.3 GTexel/s versus 83.20 GTexel/s
• FP32: 8.873 TFLOPS versus 665.6 GFLOPS
• FP16: 138.6 GFLOPS (1:64) versus 1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 180 W versus 15 W
• Slot width: dual-slot versus IGP
• Power connectors: 1x 8-pin versus none
• Suggested PSU: 450 W versus not listed
• Bus interface: PCIe 3.0 x16 versus ring bus
• Display outputs: 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort 1.4a versus motherboard dependent
• Dimensions: 267 mm x 111 mm versus not listed
• Release date: 2016-09-30 versus not listed
• Launch MSRP: 2,499 USD versus not listed

Fields that match include DirectX support (12, version 12_1), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4, and production status (end-of-life for both).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro P5000 scores 52,509, which is 701.2% higher than the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 6,554.

Q: Does the Intel UHD Graphics P750 have any recorded benchmark wins over the Quadro P5000?

A: No. The database shows one head-to-head benchmark, and the Quadro P5000 wins it. The Intel part has no recorded wins.

Q: How much memory does each processor have?

A: The Quadro P5000 has 16 GB of GDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 288.5 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures?

A: The Quadro P5000 delivers 8.873 TFLOPS, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 delivers 665.6 GFLOPS.

Q: Which processor has more shading units?

A: The Quadro P5000 has 2,560 shading units, compared to 256 for the Intel UHD Graphics P750.

Q: What is the power draw of each?

A: The Quadro P5000 is rated at 180 W TDP and requires a 1x 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W PSU. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is rated at 15 W TDP and has no power connectors.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: No. Both are listed as end-of-life in the database.