Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 Comparison

Intel UHD Graphics P750 is an integrated graphics solution built into Intel's Rocket Lake processors, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a discrete, triple-slot add-in card from the Ada Lovelace generation. The data shows two products at opposite ends of the performance spectrum, yet both hold a similar overall percentile ranking among all GPUs, which makes for a curious comparison worth investigating.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results available for these two GPUs come from different test suites, so a direct apples-to-apples comparison is not possible from the FACT PACK. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 was tested with Geekbench OpenCL, scoring 6,554 points. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 was tested with 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scoring 6,269.5 points. While these numbers are not directly comparable due to differing workloads and APIs, each score places the respective GPU in a specific context relative to its own peers.

Looking at the Intel UHD Graphics P750's nearest rivals, the data shows it sits within a narrow performance band. It trails the AMD Radeon HD 7730M by 0.4% (6,581 vs 6,554) and the AMD Radeon R7 M460 by 0.9% (6,612 vs 6,554). Conversely, it leads the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M by 0.6% (6,513 vs 6,554) and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M by 0.9% (6,493 vs 6,554). These deltas are all under 1%, indicating that the P750 performs essentially at par with these older mobile discrete GPUs, which is notable for an integrated solution.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, its nearest rivals are a more eclectic mix. It scores exactly the same as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER (6,269.5 vs 6,270, a 0% delta). It also trails the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9% (6,327 vs 6,269.5) but leads the NVIDIA Quadro K620 by 0.2% (6,282 vs 6,269.5) and the AMD FirePro W600 by 0.8% (6,223 vs 6,269.5). The near-zero deltas against these vastly different cards suggest the 3DMark Steel Nomad score is tightly clustered in this dataset, though the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's raw specifications tell a much more aggressive story.

The most striking takeaway is that despite the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 having 33 times more shading units (8,448 vs 256) and a 66x higher FP32 throughput (44.10 TFLOPS vs 665.6 GFLOPS), its percentile ranking (36th) is actually lower than the P750's (38th). This is a data anomaly that likely reflects the different benchmark pools and the age of the integrated GPU's comparisons versus modern high-end cards.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is immense, starting with the manufacturing process. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is built on Intel's 14 nm+++ process node, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm node. This process difference alone explains a great deal about power efficiency and density, though the P750's modest 15 W TDP versus the RTX card's 285 W TDP shows how the integrated part is constrained by thermal limits.

The Intel chip uses a Generation 12.1 architecture (HD Graphics-W, Rocket Lake), featuring 256 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 raster output units (ROPs). It has no dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores. Its memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." The base clock is 350 MHz with a boost of 1300 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 41.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 83.20 GTexel/s.

In contrast, the NVIDIA part uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD102 chip, which packs 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads—features completely absent from the Intel integrated GPU. The RTX card's boost clock is 2,610 MHz, more than double the P750's, and it pushes a pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s.

The memory configuration is another fundamental divide. The P750 uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 comes with 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX card's transistor count is listed at 76,300 million on a 609 mm² die, with a density of 125.3M per mm²; the P750's transistor count and die size are not provided in the data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel UHD Graphics P750 wins in scenarios where power consumption and physical footprint are critical. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX card's 285 W, and it requires no additional power connectors, drawing everything from the motherboard. As an IGP, it occupies zero expansion slots, making it suitable for compact, low-power systems where discrete graphics are unnecessary. Its API support includes DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which is surprisingly modern for an integrated part.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins decisively in raw compute and rendering workloads. Its FP32 performance of 44.10 TFLOPS dwarfs the P750's 665.6 GFLOPS—a 66x advantage. The RTX card also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like ray tracing and mesh shaders that the P750 cannot handle. With 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, the RTX card is built for modern gaming and professional 3D applications, while the P750 is limited to basic 2D output and light 3D acceleration.

For display connectivity, the RTX card offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the P750's outputs are "Motherboard Dependent," meaning they vary by the system builder. The RTX card is a triple-slot solution measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, requiring a 600 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin power connector—all factors that make it unsuitable for small form factor builds.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification. The process node differs (14 nm+++ vs 5 nm), as does the foundry (Intel vs TSMC). The Intel part has 256 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, while the NVIDIA part has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX card has 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores; the P750 has none.

Clock speeds differ significantly: the P750 runs at 350 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost, while the RTX card runs at 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. Memory is system shared on the Intel side versus 16 GB GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth on the NVIDIA side. The pixel rate is 41.60 GPixel/s versus 250.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 83.20 GTexel/s versus 689.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 665.6 GFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS. The TDP is 15 W versus 285 W. The bus interface is Ring Bus versus PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX card has a launch MSRP of 799 USD, while the P750 has no listed launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has an FP32 throughput of 44.10 TFLOPS, which is 66 times higher than the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 665.6 GFLOPS.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: No. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 includes 66 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 has none.

Q: How do their benchmark scores compare?

A: They were tested with different benchmarks. The Intel P750 scored 6,554 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the NVIDIA card scored 6,269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Direct comparison is not possible due to different test methodologies.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The Intel P750 uses system shared memory with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent," while the NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus providing 672.3 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a lower power requirement?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has a 15 W TDP and requires no external power connectors, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a 285 W TDP and requires a 16-pin power connector with a suggested 600 W PSU.

Q: Are both GPUs still in production?

A: No. Both are listed as "End-of-life" in the data, though the NVIDIA card has a release date of June 9, 2024, and lists a predecessor (GeForce 30) and successor (GeForce 50).

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the superior choice for any workload requiring substantial graphics processing power, including modern gaming, 3D rendering, and AI-accelerated tasks. Its 66 ray tracing cores, 264 tensor cores, and 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance place it in an entirely different performance class than the Intel integrated solution. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth ensures it can handle large textures and datasets that would cripple a system-shared memory IGP.

However, the Intel UHD Graphics P750 serves a completely different purpose. Its 15 W TDP and integrated nature make it ideal for basic office productivity, media playback, and light 2D workloads in systems where dedicated graphics are not needed. The data shows it performs comparably to older discrete mobile GPUs like the GTX 670M, which is impressive for an integrated part, but it cannot compete with a modern high-end discrete card in any meaningful way.

The choice between these two depends entirely on the use case. For a compact, low-power desktop or a basic workstation where energy efficiency and minimal footprint are priorities, the Intel P750 is sufficient. For gaming, content creation, or professional visualization, the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the only viable option from the data, despite its higher power draw, larger size, and the fact that its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,269.5 places it at the 36th percentile—a ranking that seems inconsistent with its raw specifications.