Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and Intel UHD Graphics P750 occupy very different corners of the graphics market, and the benchmark data reflects that gap clearly. The GTX 750 is a dedicated, end-of-life discrete card from 2014, while the P750 is an integrated processor graphics solution from Intel’s Rocket Lake generation. In the sole head-to-head benchmark available, the GTX 750 wins decisively, scoring 9,315 in Geekbench OpenCL against the P750’s 6,554, a 42.1% advantage. For anyone building a system and expecting playable gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads, the GTX 750 is the obvious choice; the P750 is best reserved for basic display output and light, non-demanding tasks where its 15 W power draw and integrated nature are assets.

The Verdict

The data presents a straightforward split decision. If your priority is raw compute performance, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 is the only option worth considering. Its average benchmark score of 7,222 places it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 sits at 6,554 and the 38th percentile. The GTX 750’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile (7,203 avg score, 0.3% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (7,157 avg score, 0.9% delta), showing it competes in a higher performance tier than the P750, whose closest peers are the AMD Radeon HD 7730M (6,581 avg score, -0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M (6,493 avg score, 0.9% delta).

Choose the GTX 750 if you need a functional, low-profile discrete GPU for a legacy system. It has 1,024 MB of dedicated GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 80.19 GB/s of bandwidth, and its 55 W TDP means it draws power directly from the PCIe 3.0 x16 slot with no external power connectors. It is a single-slot card, 145 mm long, and supports DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its launch MSRP was 119 USD.

Choose the Intel UHD Graphics P750 if you are building a low-power, compact system where a dedicated card is impractical. Its 15 W TDP and IGP slot width mean it requires no extra cooling or power wiring. However, its performance is limited: it relies on system-shared memory, and its bandwidth is system-dependent, which is a major bottleneck. The P750 does support DirectX 12 (12_1), a newer feature level than the GTX 750’s 11_0, but this does not translate into a compute win.

Where Each One Wins

The GTX 750 wins in every measurable performance category. The head-to-head Geekbench OpenCL test shows it at 9,315 versus 6,554, a 42.1% advantage. Its peak FP32 throughput is 1,111.0 GFLOPS, compared to the P750’s 665.6 GFLOPS. It also has a higher base clock (1020 MHz vs 350 MHz) and boost clock (1085 MHz vs 1300 MHz, though the P750’s higher boost does not overcome the core count deficit). The GTX 750’s shading units number 512, double the P750’s 256, and it has 32 TMUs and 16 ROPs, versus 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs for the P750.

The P750’s only theoretical wins are in fill-rate-oriented specs. Its pixel rate is 41.60 GPixel/s versus 17.36 GPixel/s for the GTX 750, and its texture rate is 83.20 GTexel/s versus 34.72 GTexel/s. These numbers suggest the P750 has more ROPs and TMUs, but in practice, the system-shared memory and lower FP32 compute limit its real-world usefulness. The P750 also supports FP16 at 1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1), which the GTX 750 does not list, but this is a niche advantage for specific compute workloads.

For gaming, the GTX 750 is the clear winner. Its dedicated memory, higher bandwidth, and 42.1% OpenCL lead mean it can handle older titles at reasonable settings. The P750 is suited only for desktop productivity, video playback, and very light 2D workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural eras and design philosophies. The GTX 750 uses NVIDIA’s Maxwell architecture on a 28 nm process at TSMC, with a GM107 chip containing 1,870 million transistors on a 148 mm² die. That works out to a transistor density of 12.6M per mm². The P750 uses Intel’s Generation 12.1 architecture on a 14 nm+++ process at Intel, with a Rocket Lake chip. Intel does not disclose transistor count or die size for this part.

The GTX 750 is a discrete card with its own memory subsystem: 1,024 MB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 80.19 GB/s. The P750 is an integrated GPU that shares system memory, with bus width and bandwidth listed as “System Shared” and “System Dependent.” This is the single biggest architectural difference affecting performance.

Compute resources also differ. The GTX 750 has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The P750 has 256 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Despite having fewer shading units, the P750’s higher ROP/TMU counts give it higher theoretical fill rates, but its FP32 output is much lower at 665.6 GFLOPS.

The GTX 750 connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, while the P750 uses a Ring Bus, reflecting its integrated nature. Display outputs are also a differentiator: the GTX 750 offers 2x DVI and 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a, whereas the P750’s outputs are motherboard-dependent. Both support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the P750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) versus the GTX 750’s DirectX 12 (11_0).

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 has an average benchmark score of 7,222, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 6,554, in the 38th percentile.

Q: How much faster is the GTX 750 in the head-to-head OpenCL test?

A: The GTX 750 scores 9,315 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the P750 scores 6,554. This is a 42.1% delta in favor of the GTX 750.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The GTX 750 has 1,024 MB of dedicated GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus with 80.19 GB/s bandwidth. The P750 uses system-shared memory, with its bandwidth listed as system-dependent.

Q: Which GPU supports the newer DirectX feature level?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 supports DirectX 12 (11_0). The P750’s feature level is newer, but this does not overcome the GTX 750’s compute advantage.

Q: What is the power requirement for each?

A: The GTX 750 has a 55 W TDP and requires no external power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The P750 has a 15 W TDP and is an IGP, so it draws power from the motherboard with no separate power connectors.

Q: Does the GTX 750 have any nearest rivals that are close in performance?

A: Yes, its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile, which has an average score of 7,203, a 0.3% delta from the GTX 750. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 are also close, both at 7,171 and 7,170 with 0.7% deltas.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There is only one direct benchmark comparison in the data, and it is decisive. In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 scores 9,315, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 6,554. The GTX 750 wins by 42.1%, a massive margin that reflects the fundamental difference between a dedicated GPU with its own memory and an integrated GPU sharing system resources.

This OpenCL result aligns with the broader average benchmark scores. The GTX 750’s average of 7,222 is 10.2% higher than the P750’s 6,554. The GTX 750 also has additional benchmark entries (Geekbench Metal at 4,274 and Geekbench Vulkan at 8,078) that the P750 lacks, indicating a more capable and versatile compute platform.

The GTX 750’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile, scores 7,203 on average, which is 0.3% below the GTX 750. This shows the GTX 750 sits right at the edge of a performance tier where integrated and low-end discrete GPUs converge. The P750, by contrast, is closest to the AMD Radeon HD 7730M (6,581 average, -0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M (6,493 average, 0.9% delta), placing it in a lower performance bracket entirely.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every key specification field. The GTX 750 is built on a 28 nm process at TSMC, while the P750 uses a 14 nm+++ process at Intel. The GTX 750’s chip is GM107 with 1,870 million transistors and a 148 mm² die size; the P750’s Rocket Lake chip has no disclosed transistor count or die size.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The GTX 750 has a base clock of 1020 MHz and a boost clock of 1085 MHz, with memory clocked at 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective). The P750 has a base clock of 350 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with system-shared memory. While the P750’s boost clock is higher, its base clock is much lower, and its memory bandwidth is system-dependent.

Memory is a stark contrast. The GTX 750 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 80.19 GB/s bandwidth. The P750 has system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. Shading units are 512 for the GTX 750 and 256 for the P750, but the P750 has more TMUs (64 vs 32) and ROPs (32 vs 16). Pixel rate is 17.36 GPixel/s for the GTX 750 and 41.60 GPixel/s for the P750; texture rate is 34.72 GTexel/s versus 83.20 GTexel/s.

Compute output favors the GTX 750: FP32 is 1,111.0 GFLOPS versus 665.6 GFLOPS. The P750 offers FP16 at 1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1), which the GTX 750 does not list. Power draw is another major split: 55 W for the GTX 750 versus 15 W for the P750. The GTX 750 is a single-slot card with no power connectors and a 250 W suggested PSU, while the P750 is an IGP with no connectors or suggested PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16 for the GTX 750 and Ring Bus for the P750. Display outputs are 2x DVI and 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a for the GTX 750, versus motherboard-dependent outputs for the P750. The GTX 750 supports DirectX 12 (11_0), while the P750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1); both share OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.