Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison
Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is an integrated graphics solution built into Raptor Lake processors, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a discrete add-in board based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The database contains one recorded benchmark for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and no benchmark entries for the Intel part. The performance gap between these two products is extreme, and the recorded data provides a clear picture of their relative positions.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The only benchmark score recorded in the database for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scored 6269.5 points. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no benchmark entries, meaning there is no direct head-to-head measurement available for comparison.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 6270 points. This places it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile sits at the 50th percentile, but that percentile is calculated from a database with no recorded benchmark scores for this particular iGPU, so the percentile reflects its position among all GPUs based on other data points, not from actual performance measurements.
When examining the nearest rivals for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, the data shows a tight cluster of similar scores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER exactly with an average score of 6270 and a delta of 0 percent. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2 percent higher. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8 percent lower. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, which is 0.9 percent higher.
These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s recorded performance is essentially identical to these four rivals in the Steel Nomad workload. The fact that a modern high-end GeForce card scores within 1 percent of an entry-level Quadro and a low-end Radeon from previous generations suggests the benchmark itself, or the specific test conditions, may not isolate raw compute capability in a way that separates these products meaningfully. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no such rival data, so no comparative analysis can be made from the database.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile delivers 12.80 GPixel/s and 25.60 GTexel/s. In raw throughput terms, the NVIDIA part processes pixels at roughly 18 times the rate of the Intel iGPU, and textures at roughly 27 times the rate. These figures come directly from the recorded specifications, not from benchmark scores, but they illustrate the magnitude of the hardware resource difference.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no recorded benchmark wins in the database. It also has no head-to-head benchmark entries, so the wins count for both products is zero in direct comparisons. However, the Intel part does have advantages in specific areas that are not performance-related.
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile operates at a TDP of 15 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER consumes 350 W. The Intel part is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, meaning it shares system memory and requires no additional power connectors. The NVIDIA part is a Dual-slot card with a 16-pin power connector and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. For systems where power draw and physical space are constrained, the Intel iGPU is the only viable option, but this is a system design consideration rather than a performance win.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every measurable performance category. It has 8960 shading units versus 256, 280 texture mapping units versus 16, and 96 raster output units versus 8. It also features 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, neither of which exist on the Intel part. The FP32 compute rate is 43.94 TFLOPS versus 819.2 GFLOPS, a difference of roughly 54 times. The FP16 rate is 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 1.638 TFLOPS (2:1), a difference of roughly 27 times.
Memory bandwidth is another decisive separation. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth figure, meaning no fixed bandwidth number exists. In practice, shared system memory bandwidth is far lower than dedicated GDDR7, but the database does not provide a specific value to quote.
Architecture Differences
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is built on Intel’s Generation 12.2 architecture, also referred to as HD Graphics-M for Raptor Lake. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel’s own foundry. The chip is integrated into the processor package, hence the IGP slot width designation.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process node from TSMC. The chip is designated GB203 and contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. These figures are recorded in the database and represent the physical design differences between the two parts.
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no discrete transistor count or die size recorded, which is typical for integrated graphics where the GPU shares the processor die. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The DirectX version difference, 12_1 versus 12_2, reflects a feature level gap that matters for certain modern rendering techniques.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores. The Intel part has neither. This architectural difference means the NVIDIA card can accelerate ray-traced lighting and AI-based operations in hardware, while the Intel iGPU cannot. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a boost clock of 2452 MHz and a base clock of 2295 MHz, while the Intel part boosts to 1600 MHz with a 300 MHz base.
The memory subsystem is fundamentally different. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 with a 256-bit bus and a memory clock of 1750 MHz, which is 28 Gbps effective. The Intel part uses system shared memory for both capacity and type, with a system dependent bandwidth. The display outputs differ as well: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Intel part’s outputs are listed as portable device dependent.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Intel part has no physical dimensions recorded because it is an integrated component. The release dates are also different: the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile was released on January 3, 2023, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a recorded release date of December 31, 2025.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No. The database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile, so its average benchmark score is listed as 0 and it has no nearest rivals.
Q: What is the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s recorded benchmark score?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scored 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 6270.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches it with a delta of 0 percent. The Quadro K620 is 0.2 percent higher, the FirePro W600 is 0.8 percent lower, and the Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9 percent higher.
Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?
A: The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has a TDP of 15 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W.
Q: Does the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile support ray tracing?
A: No. The Intel part has no ray tracing cores recorded. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 ray tracing cores.
Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth.
The Verdict
The data shows no meaningful competition between these two products. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 235.4 GPixel/s of pixel rate, and 686.6 GTexel/s of texture rate. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile delivers 819.2 GFLOPS, 12.80 GPixel/s, and 25.60 GTexel/s. Every recorded specification that relates to rendering capability favors the NVIDIA part by a wide margin.
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is appropriate for systems where the 15 W power envelope and integrated form factor are requirements. It has no discrete memory, no ray tracing hardware, and no tensor cores. Its DirectX 12_1 support is a generation behind the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) feature set.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only one of the two with any recorded performance data. Its benchmark score places it in a tight cluster with four rivals within 1 percent, all scoring between 6223 and 6327. The database shows no benchmark results for the Intel part, so any performance comparison beyond specifications is impossible.
For any workload that involves 3D rendering, ray tracing, or compute acceleration, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For a system that must rely on integrated graphics with minimal power draw, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile exists as a functional but unremarkable option. The database records no scenario where the Intel part outperforms the NVIDIA card in any measured metric. The verdict is straightforward: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER dominates in every recorded performance category, and the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile only wins in power consumption and integration requirements.