Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data draws a clear line between these two processors. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is an integrated graphics solution with an average benchmark score of 7441, placing it at the 40th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (average score 7447, 0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon R7 350 (average score 7425, 0.2% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (average score 7472, 0.4% ahead), and the Intel Arc A310 (average score 7550, 1.4% ahead). This places the UHD 750 in a crowded field of entry-level discrete and integrated parts, where its performance is competitive but not dominant within its immediate peer group.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, by contrast, posts an average benchmark score of 6270 from its sole recorded test, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark. Its percentile ranking sits at 36, which is lower than the Intel part's percentile, but this is a direct consequence of the different benchmark workloads. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER (identical average score of 6270, 0% delta), the NVIDIA Quadro K620 (average score 6282, 0.2% ahead), the AMD FirePro W600 (average score 6223, 0.8% behind), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (average score 6327, 0.9% ahead). The near-identical scores among these rivals suggest that the 3DMark Steel Nomad test compresses results within a narrow band, which is unusual given the massive architectural differences between these parts.

The use-case split is stark. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 wins on the Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, which are compute-oriented and favor its integrated design with system-shared memory. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins on the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which is a modern rasterization workload that stresses dedicated graphics hardware. For users running general-purpose compute tasks or older API workloads, the Intel part holds its own. For users running current DirectX 12 gaming or 3D rendering workloads, the NVIDIA part is the only viable option, despite its lower average score in this dataset.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is generational and fundamental. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is built on Rocket Lake, using Intel's Generation 12.1 architecture, and is fabricated on a 14 nm+++ process at Intel's own foundry. It features 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 raster operation units. Its base clock is 300 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz. Memory is system-shared, meaning the iGPU borrows from the main system RAM, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The chip has no dedicated RT cores and no tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 10.40 GPixel/s, texture rate is 20.80 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 665.6 GFLOPS. FP16 performance is listed as 1,331.2 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The thermal design power is 15 W, and it connects via a ring bus interface. Display outputs are motherboard dependent, and it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a completely different class of hardware. It uses the AD102 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 76,300 million transistors across a 609 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². It has 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation units, 66 RT cores, and 264 tensor cores. The base clock is 2340 MHz with a boost clock of 2610 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, providing 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. Pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 44.10 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is also 44.10 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, a stark contrast to the Intel part's 2:1 ratio. The TDP is 285 W, it occupies a triple-slot form factor, requires a 600 W suggested PSU, and uses a single 16-pin power connector. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs through 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The process node difference alone, 14 nm+++ versus 5 nm, explains much of the performance gap. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 33 times more shading units, 16.5 times more TMUs, and 12 times more ROPs. Its FP32 throughput is roughly 66 times higher. The RT cores and tensor cores are entirely absent from the Intel part, meaning ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads are simply not possible on the UHD 750. The memory subsystem is also completely different: system-shared RAM versus dedicated GDDR6X with a 256-bit bus. These are not competing products in any meaningful sense; they are different categories of hardware.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: these two GPUs serve entirely different purposes, and the choice depends on the workload. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is an integrated solution for systems where low power consumption (15 W TDP) and basic display output are the priorities. Its benchmark scores in Geekbench OpenCL (6743) and Vulkan (8138) show it can handle lightweight compute tasks and older games at modest settings. Its position at the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with rivals like the GTX 1650 within 0.4%, indicates it performs at the level of a low-end discrete GPU from several generations ago. For office work, media playback, and light productivity, it is sufficient.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is for users who need serious 3D rendering, ray tracing, and high-refresh-rate gaming. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, while modest in absolute terms, must be interpreted within its benchmark context. The 36th percentile ranking is misleading because the Steel Nomad test is a demanding modern workload that separates GPUs differently than legacy compute tests. The fact that its nearest rivals include the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER (identical score) and the Quadro K620 (0.2% ahead) suggests that the Steel Nomad test has its own scaling characteristics, not that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a weak performer. With 66 RT cores, 264 tensor cores, and 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, it is architecturally equipped for tasks the Intel part cannot even attempt.

Who should pick which? For a compact, low-power system that needs basic graphics and compute, the Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the only choice among these two, and its end-of-life status means it appears in existing systems rather than new builds. For anyone building a workstation or gaming rig with a dedicated GPU, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the only option that can handle modern DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads, despite its higher power draw and triple-slot footprint. The launch MSRP for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is 799 USD, stated once here for reference. The Intel part has no launch MSRP in the database, reflecting its integrated nature.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 has an average benchmark score of 7441, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has an average score of 6270. However, these scores come from different benchmark suites, so they are not directly comparable.

Q: Does the Intel UHD Graphics 750 support ray tracing?

A: No. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 has no RT cores listed in the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 66 RT cores.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 665.6 GFLOPS for the Intel UHD Graphics 750.

Q: Are these GPUs still in production?

A: Both are listed as end-of-life in the database. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 was released on March 29, 2021, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 was released on June 9, 2024.

Q: What API support does each GPU offer?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs. Instead, each has its own benchmark entries, and the comparison must be made through their respective scores and nearest rivals.

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 records two benchmark results. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 6743, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 8138. The Vulkan score is notably higher, suggesting the integrated GPU performs better under Vulkan's lower-overhead API than under OpenCL. Its average benchmark score of 7441 places it within a tight cluster of rivals: the AMD Radeon HD 8850M is 0.1% ahead, the AMD Radeon R7 350 is 0.2% behind, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is 0.4% ahead, and the Intel Arc A310 is 1.4% ahead. These small deltas indicate that the UHD 750 is well-matched against these older or lower-tier parts, and its 40th percentile ranking reflects this crowded middle-low segment.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a single recorded benchmark: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 6269.5. Its average benchmark score is 6270. The nearest rivals show an unusually tight grouping: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches at 0% delta, the Quadro K620 is 0.2% ahead, the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% behind, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9% ahead. This clustering is suspicious and likely reflects the benchmark's design, which may saturate or compress scores for GPUs with vastly different architectures. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's 36th percentile ranking, lower than the Intel part's 40th, is a direct result of this single-test dataset and should not be read as the NVIDIA part being slower overall.

The biggest wins for the Intel part are its Geekbench scores, where it demonstrates solid compute capability for an integrated GPU. The biggest win for the NVIDIA part is its architectural capability: 44.10 TFLOPS FP32, 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 689.0 GTexel/s texture rate, all of which dwarf the Intel part's 665.6 GFLOPS, 10.40 GPixel/s, and 20.80 GTexel/s. In terms of raw throughput, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is roughly 66 times higher in FP32, 24 times higher in pixel rate, and 33 times higher in texture rate. These are not incremental differences; they are orders of magnitude.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between these two GPUs are extensive and define their separate roles.

Process and Foundry: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses a 14 nm+++ process at Intel. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Transistors and Die Size: The Intel part has no transistor or die size data recorded. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die with a density of 125.3 million per mm².

Clock Speeds: The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 1300 MHz. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a base of 2340 MHz and a boost of 2610 MHz. Memory clock is 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective for the NVIDIA part; the Intel part uses system-shared memory.

Memory: The Intel part has system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute Units: The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA part also has 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores; the Intel part has none.

Performance Rates: The Intel part has a pixel rate of 10.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 20.80 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 665.6 GFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS. FP16 is 1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1) versus 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1).

Power and Physical: The Intel part has a TDP of 15 W and occupies an IGP slot width. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a TDP of 285 W, is triple-slot, requires a 600 W suggested PSU, and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector. The NVIDIA part measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width; the Intel part has no dimensions recorded.

Bus and Outputs: The Intel part uses a ring bus interface and motherboard-dependent display outputs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs through 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

API Support: Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Release Dates: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 was released on March 29, 2021. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 was released on June 9, 2024. Both are end-of-life. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a predecessor listed as GeForce 30 and a successor as GeForce 50; the Intel part has none listed.