GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

GPU

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

CORE STATE DG1

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

400

N/A

geekbench_opencl

20,255

14,315

geekbench_vulkan

30,336

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

890

N/A

passmark_g3d

5,310

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

2,840

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

When analyzing AMD AMD Radeon 760M to Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics, the gaming margin gets immediately evident. AMD AMD Radeon 760M holds the top spot in essentially every test we conducted. The delta is notable sufficiently to influence real-world gaming experiences. Gamers should experience better gameplay. This verdict is evident.

When it comes to real-time ray tracing, AMD AMD Radeon 760M moves considerably ahead of Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics. The RT hardware process heavy reflection computations significantly more capably. Enthusiasts seeking modern fidelity would certainly pick AMD AMD Radeon 760M. The hardware RT capability is significant. Contemporary games more and more use RT capabilities.

In conclusion, AMD AMD Radeon 760M delivers the better pick in this comparison. Its gaming leads justify consideration for anyone building a demanding visual PC. Even though Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers its advantages, the benchmark results definitely advantages AMD AMD Radeon 760M. Make your choice considering this. This performance difference is substantial enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

760M

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Core Specs

Shading Units

512

768 +50.0%

Shaders

512

768 +50.0%

TMUs

48 +50.0%

ROPs

24 +50.0%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

300 MHz

Boost Clock

2599 MHz

1650 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

2133 MHz 4.3 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

4,096

Memory Type

System Shared

LPDDR4X

Memory Bus

System Shared

128 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

68.26 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

2 MB

1024 KB

L3 Cache

—

16 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

41.58 GPixel/s

39.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

83.17 GTexel/s

79.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS

2.534 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)

633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)

5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Power

TDP

15 W

25 W

TDP (W)

25 +66.7%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

—

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Generation 12.1

GPU Name

Phoenix

DG1

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix)

Xe Graphics

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

—

Die Size

178 mm²

95 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Density

142.6M / mm²

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

Graphics

Successor

—

Alchemist

View Radeon 760M Details View Iris Xe MAX Graphics Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons