Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103. Both entries carry an average benchmark score of zero and hold identical percentile positions at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database. This creates an unusual situation where the statistical comparison framework offers no measurable separation between the two parts, despite the vast architectural gap between them.

The absence of benchmark scores means the raw performance differential must be derived from the specification sheets. The NVIDIA part delivers 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel integrated solution produces 1.856 TFLOPS. That places the RTX 4070 AD103 at roughly 15.7 times the raw floating-point throughput of the Iris Xe. Texture throughput follows a similar pattern: 455.4 GTexel/s versus 58.00 GTexel/s. Pixel fill rates stand at 158.4 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA card and 29.00 GPixel/s for the Intel IGP.

Memory bandwidth separates the two even more decisively. The RTX 4070 AD103 accesses 12 GB of GDDR6X across a 192-bit bus, yielding 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Iris Xe uses system-shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent. No fixed figure exists for the Intel side, but the architectural reliance on shared system memory places it at a structural disadvantage in bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

The database records no wins for either component in the head-to-head category. Both items show zero wins, which means the comparison must rely entirely on the technical specifications and the qualitative differences between an integrated graphics processor and a discrete add-in board.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. Intel builds the Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile on the Generation 12.2 architecture, using the Raptor Lake chip. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated at Intel's own foundry. NVIDIA designs the RTX 4070 AD103 around the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD103 chip on a 5 nm process from TSMC. The transistor counts reflect this gap: the AD103 packs 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The Intel part lists no transistor count or die size in the database.

The execution resources differ by an order of magnitude. Intel's IGP contains 640 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 ROPs. NVIDIA's discrete card carries 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The RTX 4070 AD103 also includes dedicated hardware that the Iris Xe lacks entirely: 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The Intel part lists no RT cores and no tensor cores, meaning ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads have no dedicated paths on the integrated solution.

Clock behavior also differs. The Iris Xe runs at a 300 MHz base clock with a 1450 MHz boost. The RTX 4070 AD103 starts at 1920 MHz base and boosts to 2475 MHz. Memory clocks show a similar asymmetry: the NVIDIA card runs its GDDR6X at 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective data rate, while the Intel part relies on system-shared memory with no fixed clock.

The API support shows a notable split. Both parts support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, the NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel IGP supports DirectX 12 (12_1). This means the RTX 4070 AD103 can access the full DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set, including hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shaders, while the Iris Xe is limited to the baseline DirectX 12 feature level.

The power envelope separates the two designs completely. Intel rates the Iris Xe at 15 W TDP, appropriate for an integrated GPU inside a mobile processor. NVIDIA rates the RTX 4070 AD103 at 200 W TDP, with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested power supply of 550 W. The physical form factors reflect this: the Intel part is an IGP with no slot width, while the NVIDIA card is a dual-slot board measuring 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 AD103 wins on every measurable compute metric in the database. Raw FP32 throughput, texture fill, pixel fill, memory bandwidth, and dedicated feature hardware all favor the NVIDIA part. The 46 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which the Intel IGP cannot perform with dedicated silicon. The 184 tensor cores provide a path for AI inference and DLSS-style workloads, again absent from the Intel architecture.

The Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile wins in power efficiency in absolute terms. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the 200 W TDP of the RTX 4070 AD103. In thermally constrained mobile chassis, the integrated solution requires no separate power delivery, no cooling for a discrete board, and no additional slot space. The database lists the Iris Xe as an IGP, meaning it shares the system memory and operates within the CPU's power budget.

The Intel part also wins on production status. The database lists the Iris Xe as active, while the RTX 4070 AD103 is marked end-of-life. The NVIDIA card's predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series, indicating it sits at the end of its product cycle. The Iris Xe's successor is Arc Graphics-M, but the current generation remains in active production.

For use cases, the data supports a clear split. Systems requiring discrete graphics performance, high-resolution gaming, ray tracing, or AI acceleration would select the RTX 4070 AD103. Systems prioritizing low power draw, integrated simplicity, and portability would use the Iris Xe. The NVIDIA card's 12 GB memory capacity and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth serve memory-intensive workloads, while the Intel part's system-shared memory approach keeps costs and complexity low but limits peak performance.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 1.856 TFLOPS for the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile.

Q: Does the Intel Iris Xe support ray tracing?

A: No. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Intel part. The NVIDIA RTX 4070 AD103 includes 46 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA card uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel IGP uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a lower power requirement?

A: The Intel Iris Xe is rated at 15 W TDP. The NVIDIA RTX 4070 AD103 is rated at 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: When was each product released?

A: The Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile released on January 3, 2023. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 released on February 29, 2024.

Q: Are both GPUs currently in production?

A: No. The Intel part is listed as active in the database. The NVIDIA card is marked end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series listed as its successor.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

The Intel part uses the Raptor Lake chip on Generation 12.2 architecture with a 10 nm process from Intel's foundry. The NVIDIA card uses the AD103 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. The NVIDIA die contains 45,900 million transistors across 379 mm², with a density of 121.1M per mm². The Intel part records no transistor or die size data.

Clock speeds: Intel runs at 300 MHz base and 1450 MHz boost. NVIDIA runs at 1920 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost. Memory clocks: Intel uses system-shared memory with no fixed clock, while NVIDIA runs GDDR6X at 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective.

Compute resources: Intel has 640 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. NVIDIA has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. NVIDIA adds 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores; Intel has none.

Performance rates: Intel produces 29.00 GPixel/s pixel fill and 58.00 GTexel/s texture fill. NVIDIA produces 158.4 GPixel/s and 455.4 GTexel/s. FP32: 1.856 TFLOPS versus 29.15 TFLOPS. FP16: Intel achieves 3.712 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while NVIDIA achieves 29.15 TFLOPS at 1:1.

Power and physical specs: Intel is 15 W TDP with IGP slot width and no power connectors. NVIDIA is 200 W TDP, dual-slot, with one 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. NVIDIA measures 240 mm by 110 mm by 40 mm.

Memory: Intel uses system-shared size, type, and bus width. NVIDIA uses 12 GB GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

DirectX support: Intel supports DirectX 12 (12_1). NVIDIA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Bus interface: Intel uses Ring Bus. NVIDIA uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs: Intel is portable-device dependent. NVIDIA provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Release and status: Intel released January 3, 2023, is active, and lists Arc Graphics-M as successor. NVIDIA released February 29, 2024, is end-of-life, lists GeForce 30 as predecessor and GeForce 50 as successor. NVIDIA has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. Intel has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data presents a complete performance hierarchy. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 dominates every compute metric recorded in the database. Its 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 455.4 GTexel/s texture rate, 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and dedicated RT and tensor cores position it as a high-performance discrete graphics solution. The 12 GB GDDR6X frame buffer and DirectX 12 Ultimate support confirm its suitability for demanding gaming and professional workloads.

The Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile occupies the integrated graphics segment. Its 15 W TDP, system-shared memory, and absence of dedicated RT or tensor cores define it as a power-efficient solution for everyday graphics tasks in mobile systems. The 640 shading units and 1.856 TFLOPS provide sufficient capability for basic rendering, but the architectural gap to the NVIDIA part is massive.

The production status tells part of the story. The Intel part remains active, while the NVIDIA card is end-of-life with a successor already designated. The RTX 4070 AD103 also carries a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the Intel IGP has no listed price, reflecting its role as an integrated component rather than a standalone purchase.

The database records no benchmark wins for either side and identical 50th percentile positions, but the specification table leaves no ambiguity. The RTX 4070 AD103 is the performance choice by every measurable margin. The Iris Xe is the efficiency choice, operating at 15 W within the CPU's thermal envelope. Each part serves a distinct system class, and the data supports selecting the NVIDIA card for discrete performance needs and the Intel IGP for low-power integrated use.