Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark database separates these two GPUs into completely different performance strata, and the recorded scores reflect that gap. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER posts an average benchmark score of 6270, placing it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300, by contrast, averages 5712, sitting at the 33rd percentile. That is a narrow percentile gap, but the underlying workloads are not directly comparable, as each was measured with a different test suite.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER was evaluated using 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a demanding modern rasterization test. Its score of 6269.5 places it in a cluster with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which scores an identical 6270, and the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223, which trails by 0.8%. It also edges past the NVIDIA Quadro K620 by 0.2% and leads the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9%. The data indicates this is a firmly mid-to-upper tier discrete GPU, trading blows with other dedicated desktop cards within a narrow performance band.

The Iris Pro P6300, meanwhile, was measured using Geekbench OpenCL, a compute-oriented workload. Its 5712 score sits near the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX at 5721, which is 0.1% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti at 5731, which is 0.3% faster. On the flip side, it beats the AMD Radeon HD 8790M by 0.4% and the NVIDIA Quadro M500M by 1.9%. This is an integrated processor graphics solution, and its results align with entry-level discrete GPUs from roughly the same era.

The use-case split is stark. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on modern DirectX 12 gaming workloads, with dedicated ray tracing and tensor hardware. The Iris Pro P6300 wins on low-power, integrated compute tasks and legacy compatibility, but it has no presence in the same benchmark discipline. Each GPU wins in its own category; there is no shared test where both appear.

Architecture Differences

The two parts come from different fabs, different process nodes, and different design philosophies. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It integrates 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The Iris Pro P6300 uses the Broadwell GT3e chip, based on Intel's Generation 8.0 architecture, built on Intel's 14 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The clock speeds tell a similar story. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at a base of 2295 MHz and boosts to 2452 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz, effectively 28 Gbps. The Iris Pro P6300 starts at a lowly 300 MHz base and boosts to 800 MHz, with system-shared memory whose bandwidth is system dependent. That is a massive clock advantage for the NVIDIA part, though the Intel chip's low clocks align with its 15 W TDP, versus 350 W for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

Memory configuration is another dividing line. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER carries 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Iris Pro P6300 uses system shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM, and its bandwidth is dependent entirely on the host system. In terms of raw throughput, the NVIDIA card is in a different league.

Compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores. The Iris Pro P6300 has 384 shading units, 48 TMUs, and only 6 ROPs, with no ray tracing or tensor cores. Pixel rate for the NVIDIA card is 235.4 GPixel/s, versus 4.800 GPixel/s for the Intel part. Texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 38.40 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 43.94 TFLOPS versus 614.4 GFLOPS. The NVIDIA card also supports FP16 at 43.94 TFLOPS with 1:1 ratio; the Intel chip has no recorded FP16 capability.

API support differs as well. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Iris Pro P6300 supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.4, and Vulkan 1.0. The NVIDIA card also has modern display outputs with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Intel part's display outputs are motherboard dependent. The NVIDIA card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface; the Intel part uses a Ring Bus.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear verdict for each audience. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is an active, current-generation discrete GPU, released in the GeForce 50-series lineup, and its benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 indicates it can handle modern DirectX 12 workloads at a level matching the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. It is designed for high-performance desktop systems with a 350 W TDP, dual-slot cooling, and a 16-pin power connector. The database records its launch MSRP as 749 USD. For anyone building a gaming or workstation PC around a discrete GPU, this is the part the measurements support.

The Iris Pro P6300, released in 2014, is end-of-life. Its 5712 Geekbench OpenCL score puts it in the same performance band as the GTX 670MX and GTX 550 Ti, both of which are older discrete mobile or desktop parts. It consumes only 15 W and is an integrated processor graphics solution, so it has no power connector, no slot width beyond IGP, and no dedicated memory. It is appropriate only for low-power systems where integrated graphics are sufficient, and its DirectX 12 (11_1) support is a limitation for newer titles.

The verdict is not that one is better in a universal sense; it is that the two serve disjoint markets. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is for gamers and creators who need high frame rates and modern API support. The Iris Pro P6300 is for legacy, low-power, or embedded use cases where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The database shows no shared benchmark, so a direct head-to-head comparison is impossible, but the architectural evidence and the respective percentile rankings make the performance hierarchy unambiguous.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rival in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, scores 6270, a delta of 0%. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8%, and the NVIDIA Quadro K620 leads by 0.2%, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits right in the middle of a tight performance cluster.

Q: What benchmark was used for the Intel Iris Pro P6300?

A: The database records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 5712 for the Iris Pro P6300. That is its only benchmark entry, and it places the part at the 33rd percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the memory configuration for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus, with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Iris Pro P6300 uses system shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM, and its bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: Does the Intel Iris Pro P6300 support ray tracing?

A: No. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Iris Pro P6300, and it also lists no tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores.

Q: What process nodes are used for these GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built on TSMC's 5 nm process, while the Iris Pro P6300 uses Intel's 14 nm process. The NVIDIA chip integrates 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s, compared to 4.800 GPixel/s for the Iris Pro P6300. The NVIDIA part also leads in texture rate with 686.6 GTexel/s versus 38.40 GTexel/s.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There is no shared benchmark between the two GPUs in the database, so a direct score-to-score comparison across the same test is impossible. However, the recorded data still allows a meaningful comparison through each part's nearest rivals and architectural specifications.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5. Its closest competitor, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, scores 6270, a 0% delta. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, 0.9% higher. These are all narrow margins, indicating the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is well matched to a specific performance tier, but it does not dominate its immediate rivals.

For the Iris Pro P6300, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 5712. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX scores 5721, 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti scores 5731, 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 8790M scores 5691, 0.4% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro M500M scores 5604, 1.9% lower. Again, the margins are small, but the Intel part is slightly behind the two NVIDIA entries and slightly ahead of the two AMD/older NVIDIA entries.

The biggest architectural wins for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER are in raw throughput. Its FP32 compute of 43.94 TFLOPS is orders of magnitude above the Iris Pro P6300's 614.4 GFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s dwarfs the system-dependent bandwidth of the Intel part. Its 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores give it capabilities the Iris Pro P6300 simply does not have, with no such hardware listed.

The biggest win for the Iris Pro P6300 is power efficiency. Its 15 W TDP is drastically lower than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 350 W. It also does not require a power connector or a dual-slot cooler, as it is an IGP. For systems where power draw is the primary constraint, the Intel part has a clear advantage, and its Geekbench score of 5712 shows it can still perform useful compute work despite its age.

In terms of API support, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Iris Pro P6300 supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.4, and Vulkan 1.0. The NVIDIA part's newer API versions allow it to run modern workloads that the Intel part cannot. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus the Ring Bus on the Intel chip, and its display outputs include HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b, whereas the Intel part's outputs are motherboard dependent.

The production status differs as well. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is listed as active, while the Iris Pro P6300 is end-of-life. The NVIDIA part was released at the end of 2025, and the Intel part was released in September 2014. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, recorded once in the database. The Iris Pro P6300 has no launch MSRP listed.

The data shows that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on every performance metric where both have recorded values, with the sole exception of power draw. The Iris Pro P6300 wins on efficiency and legacy compatibility, but its performance ceiling is far lower. The percentile rankings, 36th for the NVIDIA part and 33rd for the Intel part, reflect different distributions; the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's percentile is based on modern GPU scores, while the Iris Pro P6300's percentile includes many older parts. Neither GPU is a top-tier performer, but the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is clearly the more capable of the two in every measurable way except power consumption.