Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 represent two completely different epochs and market segments within the GPU landscape. The former is a current-generation, high-end discrete graphics card built for demanding workloads, while the latter is an end-of-life integrated graphics processor designed for basic computing tasks. The data in the FACT PACK shows an absolute chasm in performance capabilities, but both products serve distinct purposes based on their architectural foundations and physical constraints.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between these two products, primarily because they are tested under different methodologies. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is evaluated using the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, yielding a score of 6269.5. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200, conversely, has no matching 3DMark result, instead showing scores from Geekbench tests: 7764 in Metal, 4556 in OpenCL, and 6032 in Vulkan. Direct cross-application comparisons are impossible given the different test suites, but the average benchmark scores provide a common baseline.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves an average benchmark score of 6270, placing it in the 36th percentile of all GPUs. This score puts it in a tight race with its nearest rivals: it sits exactly 0% apart from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (score 6270), and it is just 0.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro K620 (score 6282). The data shows a slight advantage over the AMD FirePro W600, which scores 6223, giving the RTX card a 0.8% lead. Against the AMD Radeon R7 M350, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER trails by 0.9%, as that rival scores 6327. These small deltas suggest that in the Steel Nomad test, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER performs within a narrow band of its immediate competitors.

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200, with an average benchmark score of 6117, sits at the 35th percentile globally, just one percentile point below the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 8690M, which scores 6137, giving the Intel part a 0.3% deficit. The Intel chip shows a 0.6% advantage over the NVIDIA RTX A400 (score 6078) and a 0.7% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 (score 6077). The most significant delta appears against the NVIDIA Quadro P2000, which scores 6049, placing the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1.1% ahead. These figures indicate that, despite its age, the Intel integrated solution remains competitive within its own benchmark context, though that context is entirely different from the RTX card's testing environment.

The absolute performance gap becomes clearer when examining raw specifications. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 manages only 844.8 GFLOPS. This is a difference of more than fifty times in raw compute throughput. The pixel rate tells a similar story: 235.4 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA card versus 6.6 GPixel/s for the Intel part. Texture rate also diverges massively, with the RTX card achieving 686.6 GTexel/s compared to 52.8 GTexel/s for the Iris Pro. These numbers, while not from shared benchmark tests, quantify the enormous gulf in processing capability between a 350 W discrete card and a 15 W integrated processor.

FAQ

Q: How does the average benchmark score of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its closest rival?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average score of 6270, which is exactly 0% different from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, also scoring 6270. This places the two cards as direct performance equivalents in this dataset.

Q: What is the percentile ranking difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER ranks in the 36th percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 ranks in the 35th percentile. Despite the massive specification differences, they are only one percentile point apart in the global ranking.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER operates with a boost clock of 2452 MHz, whereas the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has a maximum boost of 1100 MHz. The NVIDIA card more than doubles the Intel part's clock speed.

Q: Does the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 support ray tracing?

A: No, the Intel chip has no ray tracing cores listed in the FACT PACK. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, includes 70 dedicated RT cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What are the memory configurations for each product?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM of its own.

Q: How do their production statuses differ?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is marked as "Active" in production, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is listed as "End-of-life." This reflects their respective release dates, with the Intel part launching in September 2014 and the NVIDIA card releasing in December 2025.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the superior performer in almost every measurable way. It offers 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory versus system-shared memory, a 256-bit bus versus a system-dependent interface, and 8960 shading units against 384. The RTX card's FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS dwarfs the Intel part's 844.8 GFLOPS, and its pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s is 35 times higher than the Iris Pro's 6.6 GPixel/s. For any gaming, rendering, or compute workload that requires discrete graphics performance, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only viable choice.

However, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 serves a fundamentally different purpose. As a 15 W integrated processor with no dedicated memory, it is designed for basic display output and light graphical tasks in laptops or compact desktops. Its production status is end-of-life, meaning it is obsolete by modern standards, but its benchmark performance in Geekbench tests shows it can still handle legacy applications. The RTX card, with its 350 W TDP and dual-slot form factor, requires a dedicated power connector and substantial cooling, making it unsuitable for the ultra-portable or low-power segments where the Intel chip would appear.

Users should choose the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER if they need high-end performance for modern games, creative workloads, or AI tasks that benefit from its 280 tensor cores and 70 RT cores. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 should only be considered for legacy systems or basic computing where power consumption is the primary constraint and performance expectations are minimal. The 36th versus 35th percentile ranking is misleading, as the benchmark contexts differ entirely; the RTX card is competing in a high-end DirectX 12 test, while the Intel part is measured in cross-platform Geekbench scenarios.

Specification Differences

The two products diverge on nearly every specification in the FACT PACK. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a GB203 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses a Broadwell GT3e chip on Intel's 14 nm process, with no transistor count or die size listed. Clock speeds differ dramatically: the NVIDIA card has a 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, while the Intel part runs at 300 MHz base and 1100 MHz boost.

Memory is another major differentiator. The RTX card features 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel chip uses system-shared memory of any size, with a system-dependent bus width and bandwidth. The shading units number 8960 for NVIDIA versus 384 for Intel, and TMUs are 280 versus 48. ROPs are 96 versus 6. The RTX card has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, while the Intel chip has none of either.

Power and physical characteristics also differ. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP, dual-slot width, and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has a 15 W TDP and is an IGP, requiring no power connectors. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA versus Ring Bus for Intel. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for the RTX card, while the Intel chip's outputs are motherboard dependent. The RTX card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, whereas the Intel part has no listed dimensions.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs reflects their different generations and design philosophies. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. This architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Intel's Generation 8.0 architecture, built on a 14 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.4, and Vulkan 1.0.

The transistor density illustrates the process advantage: the RTX card achieves 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter, a figure not available for the Intel part. The RTX card's 45,600 million transistors on 378 mm² represent a modern, high-density design, while the Intel chip's unspecified transistor count suggests a much simpler integrated solution. The RTX card's RT cores and tensor cores enable hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration, features entirely absent from the Intel architecture.

Clock behavior differs as well. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER maintains high clocks at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 runs at a much lower 300 MHz base and 1100 MHz boost, typical of a power-constrained integrated GPU. The memory architecture also distinguishes them: the RTX card uses dedicated GDDR7 with a 256-bit interface, whereas the Intel chip shares system memory, which introduces latency and bandwidth limitations. The RTX card's pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s are orders of magnitude higher than the Intel part's 6.6 GPixel/s and 52.8 GTexel/s, underscoring the fundamental architectural superiority of the discrete Blackwell design over the integrated Broadwell-era solution.