GPU Comparison

i

Intel

GPU

Intel GMA X3500

CORE STATE Bearlake

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED —

TDP 13 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE Generation 4.0

nm

PROCESS 90 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2007

VS

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce GTX 260

CORE STATE GT200

VRAM 896 MB

CLOCK SPEED —

TDP 182 W

BUS WIDTH 448 bit

ARCHITECTURE Tesla 2.0

nm

PROCESS 65 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2008

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

GMA X3500

GTX 260

Core Specs

Shading Units

—

192

Shaders

—

192

TMUs

8

64 +700.0%

ROPs

1

28 +2700.0%

SM Count

—

24

Clocks

GPU Clock

667 MHz

576 MHz

Shader Clock

—

1242 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

999 MHz 1998 Mbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

896 MB

VRAM (MB)

—

896

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR3

Memory Bus

System Shared

448 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

111.9 GB/s

Cache

L2 Cache

—

224 KB

Performance

Pixel Rate

667.0 MPixel/s

16.13 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

5.336 GTexel/s

36.86 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

—

476.9 GFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

—

59.62 GFLOPS (1:8)

Power

TDP

13 W

182 W

TDP (W)

13

182 +1300.0%

Suggested PSU

—

450 W

Power Connectors

—

2x 6-pin

Architecture

Architecture

Generation 4.0

Tesla 2.0

GPU Name

Bearlake

GT200

Generation

GMA Graphics (GMA 3500 IGP)

GeForce 200

Process Size

90 nm

65 nm

Transistors

—

1,400 million

Die Size

—

576 mm²

Foundry

Intel

TSMC

Density

—

2.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

9.0c

11.1 (10_0)

OpenGL

2.0

3.3

OpenCL

—

1.1

CUDA

—

1.3

Shader Model

3.0

4.0

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

267 mm 10.5 inches

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

2x DVI1x S-Video

Bus Interface

FSB

PCIe 2.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

449 USD

Production

End-of-life

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

GeForce 9

Successor

—

GeForce 400

View GMA X3500 Details View GeForce GTX 260 Details