GPU Comparison
GPU
Intel GMA 500
CORE STATE
Poulsbo
VRAM
System Shared
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
—
BUS WIDTH
System Shared
ARCHITECTURE
PowerVR SGX535
PROCESS
130 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2008
VS
GEFORCE
GeForce GTX 260
CORE STATE
GT200
VRAM
896 MB
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
182 W
BUS WIDTH
448 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Tesla 2.0
PROCESS
65 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2008
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
GMA 500
GTX 260
Core Specs
Shading Units
32
192
+500.0%
Shaders
32
192
+500.0%
TMUs
4
64
+1500.0%
ROPs
1
28
+2700.0%
SM Count
—
24
Execution Units
4
—
Clocks
GPU Clock
200 MHz
576 MHz
Shader Clock
—
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
999 MHz
1998 Mbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
896 MB
VRAM (MB)
—
896
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR3
Memory Bus
System Shared
448 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
111.9 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
—
224 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
200.0 MPixel/s
16.13 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
800.0 MTexel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
12.80 GFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
—
59.62 GFLOPS (1:8)
Power
TDP
—
182 W
TDP (W)
—
182
Suggested PSU
—
450 W
Power Connectors
—
2x 6-pin
Architecture
Architecture
PowerVR SGX535
Tesla 2.0
GPU Name
Poulsbo
GT200
Generation
GMA Graphics-T
(GMA 500 IGP)
GeForce 200
Process Size
130 nm
65 nm
Transistors
—
1,400 million
Die Size
—
576 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
—
2.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
ES 2.0
3.3
OpenCL
—
1.1
CUDA
—
1.3
Shader Model
4.1
4.0
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
267 mm
10.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x DVI1x S-Video
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
449 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
—
GeForce 9
Successor
—
GeForce 400