Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER serve fundamentally different purposes, and the recorded data makes that split clear. The Intel part is a data center accelerator with no display outputs, built around a massive 1280 mm² die with 48 GB of HBM2e memory. The NVIDIA card is a conventional graphics card with full display outputs, a 378 mm² die, and 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. Neither product is a substitute for the other. The Intel Max 1100 targets memory-capacity-bound compute workloads, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER targets high-throughput rendering and general graphics tasks. The data shows no direct benchmark comparison between the two, so the verdict rests on architectural positioning and specification differences. For anyone needing 48 GB of memory and a 8192-bit bus, the Intel card is the only option here. For anyone needing display outputs, ray tracing, and higher FP32 throughput, the NVIDIA card is the clear choice.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 wins decisively in memory capacity and memory bandwidth. It offers 48 GB of HBM2e memory, three times the capacity of the NVIDIA card's 16 GB. Its memory bus is 8192 bits wide, compared to 256 bits, and its bandwidth reaches 1.23 TB/s versus 896.0 GB/s. That is a 37% bandwidth advantage. The Intel card also has substantially more texture mapping units, 448 versus 280, and a higher texture rate of 694.4 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s, a marginal 1.1% lead. The Intel part uses a 12-pin power connector, while the NVIDIA card uses a 16-pin connector, and the Intel card has a 300 W TDP versus 350 W for the NVIDIA part.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in raw compute throughput, shading units, and graphics features. Its FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, nearly double the Intel card's 22.22 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card has 8960 shading units versus 7168, and 70 ray tracing cores versus 56. It also has 280 tensor cores, a feature the Intel card does not list. The NVIDIA part has a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s, while the Intel card's pixel rate is recorded as 0 MPixel/s. The NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Intel card lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and no Vulkan support. The NVIDIA card also has display outputs, 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Intel card has none.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from opposite ends of the hardware spectrum. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip, built on Intel's Generation 12.5 architecture with a 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry. It packs 100,000 million transistors onto a 1280 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 78.1 million per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip, built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node at TSMC. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a higher transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The Intel card's base clock is 1000 MHz with a boost of 1550 MHz, while the NVIDIA card starts at 2295 MHz and boosts to 2452 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: the Intel card runs at 600 MHz with 1200 Mbps effective, while the NVIDIA card runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective. The Intel card has no ROPs recorded (0), while the NVIDIA card has 96. The Intel card's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 22.22 TFLOPS (1:1), and the NVIDIA card similarly matches at 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1). The Intel card has a 700 W suggested PSU, while the NVIDIA card lists no suggested PSU. The Intel card is 267 mm long, the NVIDIA card is 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has 48 GB of HBM2e memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, compared to 22.22 TFLOPS for the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100.

Q: Does the Intel card support display outputs?

A: No, the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has no display outputs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Intel card has 1.23 TB/s bandwidth on an 8192-bit bus, while the NVIDIA card has 896.0 GB/s on a 256-bit bus, giving the Intel card a 37% bandwidth advantage.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has 56.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA card?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD. The Intel card has no recorded launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The Intel card has no benchmark entries and an average benchmark score of 0. The NVIDIA card has one recorded benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, with an average score of 6270. This places the NVIDIA card at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an identical average score of 6270 and a delta of 0%, the NVIDIA Quadro K620 with 6282 and a delta of -0.2%, the AMD FirePro W600 with 6223 and a delta of 0.8%, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 with 6327 and a delta of -0.9%. These deltas show the NVIDIA card performing essentially on par with its closest competitor, within a 0.9% band. The Intel card sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, but with no benchmark scores recorded, that percentile reflects its specification profile rather than measured performance. The absence of head-to-head data means any performance comparison must rely on the specification differences, which are stark. The NVIDIA card's FP32 throughput is 97.8% higher, its pixel rate is effectively infinite compared to the Intel card's 0 MPixel/s, and its boost clock is 58% higher. The Intel card counters with 200% more memory capacity, 37.3% more bandwidth, and a 60% wider memory bus. Neither card has a clear overall win because they are not competing in the same segment.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two products in the database:

• Manufacturer: Intel versus NVIDIA
• Series: None versus GeForce 50-series
• Chip: Ponte Vecchio versus GB203
• Architecture: Generation 12.5 versus Blackwell 2.0
• Generation: Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) versus GeForce 50
• Process Node: 10 nm versus 5 nm
• Foundry: Intel versus TSMC
• Transistors: 100,000 million versus 45,600 million
• Die Size: 1280 mm² versus 378 mm²
• Transistor Density: 78.1M / mm² versus 120.6M / mm²
• Base Clock: 1000 MHz versus 2295 MHz
• Boost Clock: 1550 MHz versus 2452 MHz
• Memory Clock: 600 MHz / 1200 Mbps effective versus 1750 MHz / 28 Gbps effective
• Memory Size: 48 GB versus 16 GB
• Memory Type: HBM2e versus GDDR7
• Memory Bus Width: 8192 bit versus 256 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: 1.23 TB/s versus 896.0 GB/s
• Shading Units: 7168 versus 8960
• TMUs: 448 versus 280
• ROPs: 0 versus 96
• RT Cores: 56 versus 70
• Tensor Cores: None listed versus 280
• Pixel Rate: 0 MPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 694.4 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s
• FP32: 22.22 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS
• FP16: 22.22 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 300 W versus 350 W
• Power Connectors: 1x 12-pin versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: 700 W versus None listed
• Display Outputs: No outputs versus 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
• DirectX Support: 12 (12_1) versus 12 Ultimate (12_2)
• Vulkan Support: None listed versus 1.4
• Dimensions: 267 mm length versus 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 48 mm width
• Release Date: 2023-01-09 versus 2025-12-31
• Successor: H3C Graphics versus None listed
• Launch MSRP: None versus 749 USD
• Percentile vs All GPUs: 50 versus 36
• Average Benchmark Score: 0 versus 6270