Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded benchmark result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, while the Intel Arc Pro A60M has no benchmark entries in our measurements. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves a score of 6269.5 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which rounds to an average benchmark score of 6270. This places the card at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms roughly a third of recorded graphics processors.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals group tightly around its score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers an identical average score of 6270, representing a 0 percent delta. The AMD FirePro W600 comes in at 6223, which is 0.8 percent slower. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 posts 6282, a 0.2 percent advantage over the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, while the AMD Radeon R7 M350 reaches 6327, sitting 0.9 percent ahead. These margins are remarkably small, all within a single percentage point, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER lands in a densely populated performance cluster where small variations in measurement conditions can shift relative rankings.

Because the Arc Pro A60M lacks any benchmark scores, no direct numerical comparison between the two cards is possible from the recorded data. The Intel part holds a 50th percentile rank versus all GPUs, but without an average score or rival list, that percentile cannot be translated into a concrete performance figure. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36th percentile, despite its higher absolute score, reflects the distribution of all GPUs in the database rather than a direct head-to-head result.

The absence of head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing means the data cannot establish which card wins in any specific test. The only actionable benchmark information comes from the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 run, which shows it performing within 1 percent of four different rival cards. This tight clustering suggests that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupies a well-established performance tier, but the Arc Pro A60M's position within that tier remains unquantified.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. Intel builds the Arc Pro A60M on the DG2-256 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist generation for Pro-Series Mobile. NVIDIA counters with the GB203 chip based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 series. Both are fabricated by TSMC, but at different nodes: Intel uses 6 nm, while NVIDIA employs 5 nm. This process gap contributes to a substantial transistor density difference, with Intel packing 42.8 million transistors per square millimeter versus NVIDIA's 120.6 million per square millimeter.

The raw silicon figures highlight the scale disparity. Intel's DG2-256 contains 11,500 million transistors across a 269 mm² die. NVIDIA's GB203 houses 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. That means the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER carries nearly four times the transistor count on a die that is only about 40 percent larger, enabled by the denser 5 nm process.

Compute resources diverge sharply. The Arc Pro A60M provides 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also includes 16 ray tracing cores but no dedicated tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scales this up dramatically with 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card therefore offers more than four times the shading units and ray tracing cores, with more than double the ROPs and more than double the TMUs.

Clock speeds tell a similar story. Intel's chip runs at a 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost, while NVIDIA operates at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. These higher clocks, combined with the larger compute array, produce a massive throughput gap. The Arc Pro A60M delivers 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER reaches 43.94 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, operating at a 1:1 ratio. Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern: Intel manages 83.20 GPixel/s and 166.4 GTexel/s, while NVIDIA achieves 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture differs in capacity, type, and bandwidth. The Arc Pro A60M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER doubles the capacity to 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s. That is 3.5 times the memory bandwidth, a critical advantage for texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering. Effective memory speeds are 16 Gbps for Intel and 28 Gbps for NVIDIA, reflecting the newer GDDR7 standard.

Power and physical design differ substantially. Intel rates the A60M at 95 W TDP with an IGP slot width, meaning it is designed for integrated or embedded mobile use. NVIDIA rates the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at 350 W TDP with dual-slot cooling and a 16-pin power connector. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the Intel part has no recorded dimensions, consistent with its integrated nature.

Interface and output capabilities also diverge. Intel connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, while NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are portable-device dependent for the Intel card, whereas NVIDIA provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data offers limited grounds for a use-case split because only one benchmark exists. However, the architectural specifications point to clear strengths for each card in different scenarios.

The Intel Arc Pro A60M wins on power efficiency and form factor. Its 95 W TDP against NVIDIA's 350 W represents a 255 W difference in thermal envelope. The IGP slot width means it can fit into compact or integrated systems where a dual-slot, 304 mm long card would never fit. For professional mobile workstations or embedded applications where space and power budgets are constrained, the A60M is the only viable option between the two. The lower power draw also implies simpler cooling solutions and potentially quieter operation in dense chassis configurations.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on raw compute capability across every measurable metric. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is roughly 8.25 times higher than Intel's 5.325 TFLOPS. The 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is 3.5 times Intel's 256.0 GB/s. The 16 GB VRAM capacity versus 8 GB means the NVIDIA card can handle larger datasets and higher-resolution textures without spilling to system memory. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI workloads that the Intel card lacks entirely, since the A60M has no tensor cores.

The benchmark percentile data adds context. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile despite its strong absolute score, while the Arc Pro A60M holds the 50th percentile. This suggests that the Intel card, in the broader database context, outperforms half of all recorded GPUs, but without a measured score, that percentile cannot be compared directly. The NVIDIA card's 36th percentile indicates it sits below many modern high-end GPUs, which is consistent with its rival cluster all scoring within 1 percent of each other.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result specifically exercises modern DirectX 12 rendering workloads. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's score of 6269.5 places it in a competitive tier with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which is a notable data point for users considering either card for DX12 gaming or professional 3D applications. The Arc Pro A60M has no comparable result, so no conclusion about its DX12 performance can be drawn from the database.

For professional rendering, video encoding, or scientific computing where NVIDIA's CUDA ecosystem typically dominates, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 280 tensor cores and 16 GB GDDR7 memory are decisive advantages. For applications requiring minimal power consumption or compact integration, the Arc Pro A60M's 95 W TDP and IGP form factor are unmatched by the NVIDIA part.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus the Arc Pro A60M's 5.325 TFLOPS, making it approximately 8.25 times more powerful in single-precision floating-point workloads.

Q: How much memory bandwidth do the two cards provide?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER offers 896.0 GB/s from its 16 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, while the Arc Pro A60M provides 256.0 GB/s from its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Arc Pro A60M is rated at 95 W TDP, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is rated at 350 W TDP, a difference of 255 watts in favor of the Intel part.

Q: Does the Arc Pro A60M have tensor cores?

A: No, the Intel card has no tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 280 tensor cores, which enable AI-accelerated features.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: Its 6269.5 benchmark score is within 1 percent of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (6270, 0 percent delta), AMD FirePro W600 (6223, 0.8 percent slower), NVIDIA Quadro K620 (6282, 0.2 percent faster), and AMD Radeon R7 M350 (6327, 0.9 percent faster).

Q: What are the physical size differences between the two cards?

A: The Arc Pro A60M uses an IGP slot width with no recorded dimensions, indicating an integrated design. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification category. Intel's Arc Pro A60M uses a 6 nm TSMC process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. NVIDIA's RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, achieving 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter.

Clock speeds show a significant gap: the Arc Pro A60M runs at 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ, with Intel at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and NVIDIA at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration varies in capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The Intel card has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute unit counts differ substantially: 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores for Intel versus 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores for NVIDIA. The Intel card has no tensor cores.

Throughput rates are 83.20 GPixel/s and 166.4 GTexel/s for Intel, versus 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. Floating-point performance is 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) for Intel, versus 43.94 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1) for NVIDIA.

Power and physical characteristics diverge: 95 W TDP with IGP slot width for Intel, 350 W TDP with dual-slot width and a 16-pin connector for NVIDIA. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm, while Intel has no recorded dimensions.

Bus interface and display outputs differ: PCIe 4.0 x16 for Intel versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Intel's display outputs are portable-device dependent, while NVIDIA provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Release dates and pricing also differ. The Arc Pro A60M launched on June 5, 2023, with no recorded launch MSRP. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER launched on December 31, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 749 USD. Both cards are listed as Active in production status. API support is identical: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.