Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Arc Pro A60M contains no benchmark entries, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a full set of nine benchmark scores across compute and graphics workloads. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers an average benchmark score of 35435, placing it in the 80th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Arc Pro A60M holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero in the database, which means no direct numeric comparison can be established through the head-to-head benchmark table, as it is empty.

Focusing on the NVIDIA data, the strongest result appears in PassMark G3D with a score of 24004, which is the highest recorded graphics score for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile across all listed tests. The PassMark G2D score of 981 is comparatively modest, indicating that 2D desktop workloads are not the primary strength of this part. In compute-oriented tests, the Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 143870, while the Geekbench Vulkan score is 139213, showing a close but measurable advantage for the OpenCL path over Vulkan in this specific dataset.

The legacy DirectX tests show a different ordering. PassMark DirectX 9 scores 259, DirectX 11 scores 237, and DirectX 10 scores 151, while DirectX 12 produces the lowest legacy test result at 102. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 10101 sits between the DirectX 11 and DirectX 10 results, indicating that raw compute throughput in this benchmark is not as dominant as the Geekbench OpenCL figure might suggest. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 with an average score of 35520 and a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Radeon Pro Duo at 35860 with a delta of -1.2%, the NVIDIA A2 at 34690 with a delta of 2.1%, and the NVIDIA T1000 at 36289 with a delta of -2.4%. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits slightly behind the Quadro GV100, the Radeon Pro Duo, and the T1000, while running ahead of the A2 by 2.1%.

Because the Arc Pro A60M has no benchmark scores recorded, the head-to-head section is one-sided. The database shows zero wins for the Intel part and zero wins for the NVIDIA part in the head-to-head field, which is consistent with an empty comparison table. The practical implication is that any performance positioning for the Arc Pro A60M must rely on its architectural and specification profile rather than measured scores, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile can be assessed directly through its recorded results.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every measurable benchmark category where data exists. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 143870 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 139213 indicate strong general-purpose compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 24004 confirms that this GPU handles modern 3D rendering workloads effectively, and the PassMark GPU Compute score of 10101 shows additional compute throughput beyond the graphics pipeline.

The Arc Pro A60M cannot be assigned any benchmark win because the database contains no scores for it. However, the specification sheet suggests areas where the Intel part could be positioned differently. The Arc Pro A60M uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm node from the same foundry. The Intel chip, designated DG2-256 with Xe-HPG architecture, has a die size of 269 mm², which is slightly larger than the 263 mm² die of the NVIDIA GB205 chip. The transistor count tells a different story: the Intel part has 11,500 million transistors, while the NVIDIA part has 31,100 million, giving the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile a transistor density of 118.3M per mm² compared to 42.8M per mm² for the Intel part.

In terms of memory, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile offers 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the Arc Pro A60M provides 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA part also carries a lower TDP of 60 W compared to 95 W for the Intel part, which is notable given the NVIDIA GPU's higher performance metrics. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc Pro A60M uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The Intel Arc Pro A60M does lead in one specification area: base clock. Its base clock runs at 900 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz. The boost clocks reverse this, with NVIDIA reaching 1447 MHz versus 1300 MHz for Intel. The Intel part also has a higher memory clock of 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the NVIDIA part runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, though the wider bus and newer memory type give NVIDIA the bandwidth advantage.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only one of the two with measured performance records, and those records place it in the 80th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 35435 places it within 2.4% of the NVIDIA T1000, which leads its nearest rival group at 36289, and within 0.2% of the Quadro GV100 at 35520. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also outperforms the NVIDIA A2 by 2.1%, a rival that scores 34690.

The Arc Pro A60M has no benchmark scores, so the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for it. The Intel part does offer a lower base clock advantage of 53 MHz and a boost clock that is 147 MHz lower than NVIDIA. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores, while the Arc Pro A60M has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores, with no tensor core count listed. The NVIDIA part also delivers higher pixel rate at 115.8 GPixel/s versus 83.20 GPixel/s, higher texture rate at 266.2 GTexel/s versus 166.4 GTexel/s, and higher FP32 throughput at 17.04 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS.

For users selecting between these two mobile GPUs, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear choice based on recorded performance, memory capacity, bandwidth, and feature set. The Arc Pro A60M may still serve specific use cases where its lower power draw relative to its specification sheet matters, but its 95 W TDP is actually higher than the 60 W TDP of the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The database does not provide any measured result that would support choosing the Intel part on performance grounds.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an average benchmark score of 35435. The Intel Arc Pro A60M has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 2.1% ahead of the NVIDIA A2, and it trails the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 by 0.2%, the AMD Radeon Pro Duo by 1.2%, and the NVIDIA T1000 by 2.4%.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro A60M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the core counts for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The Arc Pro A60M has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores, with no tensor core count listed.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Arc Pro A60M has a TDP of 95 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W.

Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a boost clock of 1447 MHz, while the Arc Pro A60M has a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The Intel part has a higher base clock at 900 MHz versus 847 MHz for NVIDIA.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro A60M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip, produced on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Alchemist generation in the Pro-Series Mobile lineup and uses 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip, produced on a 5 nm process also at TSMC. It belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation and uses 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 118.3M per mm².

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is part of the GeForce 50-series and its predecessor is listed as GeForce 40 Mobile. The Intel part has no series, codename, or predecessor listed in the database. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes tensor cores, with 184 of them, while the Arc Pro A60M has no tensor core count recorded. The NVIDIA part also has more RT cores, 46 versus 16, and more shading units, 5888 versus 2048.

The memory subsystem differs significantly. The Intel part uses GDDR6 with 8 GB capacity, a 128-bit bus, and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA part uses GDDR7 with 12 GB capacity, a 192-bit bus, and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. FP16 processing also differs: the Arc Pro A60M achieves 10.65 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves 17.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning no FP16 throughput advantage over FP32 on the NVIDIA part.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The process node is 6 nm for Intel and 5 nm for NVIDIA, both from TSMC. Transistor count is 11,500 million for Intel and 31,100 million for NVIDIA. Die size is 269 mm² for Intel and 263 mm² for NVIDIA, making the Intel die slightly larger despite holding far fewer transistors. Transistor density is 42.8M per mm² for Intel and 118.3M per mm² for NVIDIA.

Base clocks are 900 MHz for Intel and 847 MHz for NVIDIA. Boost clocks are 1300 MHz for Intel and 1447 MHz for NVIDIA. Memory clocks are 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective for Intel and 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective for NVIDIA. Memory capacity is 8 GB for Intel and 12 GB for NVIDIA. Memory type is GDDR6 for Intel and GDDR7 for NVIDIA. Bus width is 128 bit for Intel and 192 bit for NVIDIA. Bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s for Intel and 672.0 GB/s for NVIDIA.

Shading units number 2048 for Intel and 5888 for NVIDIA. TMUs are 128 for Intel and 184 for NVIDIA. ROPs are 64 for Intel and 80 for NVIDIA. RT cores are 16 for Intel and 46 for NVIDIA. Tensor cores are not listed for Intel and number 184 for NVIDIA. Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s for Intel and 115.8 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s for Intel and 266.2 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 throughput is 5.325 TFLOPS for Intel and 17.04 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 throughput is 10.65 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio for Intel and 17.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio for NVIDIA.

TDP is 95 W for Intel and 60 W for NVIDIA. Both use IGP slot width. The Intel part lists no power connectors, while the NVIDIA part lists none as well. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for Intel and PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent for both. The release dates are June 5, 2023 for Intel and February 28, 2025 for NVIDIA. Production status is Active for both. The NVIDIA part has a predecessor listed as GeForce 40 Mobile, while the Intel part lists no predecessor or successor. Neither part has a launch MSRP in the database.