GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc Pro A60

CORE STATE DG2-256
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400 4 GB

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
63,485
17,320
geekbench_vulkan
57,166
16,263

Analysis: Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

The graphics card analysis between Intel's Intel Arc Pro A60 graphics and NVIDIA T400 4 GB (NVIDIA) shows surprisingly similar performance. Each GPUs swap leads in different titles, with neither holding a consistent advantage. The benchmark results confirms this assessment. Neither GPU wins consistently. Buyers have a actual dilemma in this matchup.

In-game performance likewise show close performance between Intel's Intel Arc Pro A60 graphics and NVIDIA T400 4 GB (NVIDIA). Frame rates gaps usually land under 5-10%. Such small gaps are hardly perceptible during everyday gaming sessions. The two cards provide smooth performance. Those who game can decide comfortably between the options.

If frame rates is extremely matched, MSRP and capabilities become the main elements. Evaluate RT performance performance, upscaling technology, thermal requirements, and driver support when deciding between Intel's Intel Arc Pro A60 graphics and NVIDIA T400 4 GB (NVIDIA). These variables could influence the balance. Weigh holistically. This bigger picture matters.

In conclusion, the evaluation between Intel's Intel Arc Pro A60 graphics and NVIDIA T400 4 GB (NVIDIA) concludes in a near stalemate. Performance differences are marginal and doubtful to change actual experience. Focus your determination on value, software choices, and particular functionality priorities. Each are strong picks. The draw is actual.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro A60
T400 4 GB
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
384 -81.3%
Shaders
2,048
384 -81.3%
TMUs
128
24 -81.3%
ROPs
64
16 -75.0%
SM Count
6
Execution Units
256
Clocks
Base Clock
900 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
4,096 -66.7%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
384.0 GB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
16.79 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
XMX Cores
256
Power
TDP
130 W
30 W
TDP (W)
130
30 -76.9%
Suggested PSU
300 W
200 W
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Turing
GPU Name
DG2-256
TU117
Generation
Alchemist (Pro Series)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
6 nm
12 nm
Transistors
11,500 million
4,700 million
Die Size
269 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
42.8M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Single-slot
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View Arc Pro A60 Details View T400 4 GB Details