Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive overall performance advantage for the Intel Arc Pro A60 across both benchmark workloads. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the Arc Pro A60 scores 63,485 points against 48,703 points for the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, a margin of 30.4%. This is not a narrow victory; the Intel part leads by nearly a third, which places it in a completely different performance tier for compute-heavy tasks. The OpenCL result reflects raw throughput in general-purpose GPU workloads, and the gap here is substantial enough to influence any task that relies on OpenCL acceleration.

In the Geekbench Vulkan test, the Arc Pro A60 continues its winning streak with a score of 57,166 against 46,782 for the RTX A1000 Mobile, a 22.2% advantage. While the delta is smaller than in OpenCL, it still represents a significant lead in graphics API performance. Vulkan is increasingly relevant for modern rendering workloads and cross-platform compute, and the Intel card holds a firm edge in this area as well. Across both tests, the Arc Pro A60 wins 2 out of 2 comparisons, leaving the RTX A1000 Mobile with zero wins.

Looking at the broader database context, the Arc Pro A60's average benchmark score of 60,326 places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 with an average score of 60,347 (a delta of 0%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61,896 (2.5% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 at 60,140 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657 (2.8% lower). This positioning is striking: the Arc Pro A60 essentially matches the RTX 4090 in average benchmark score, despite the latter being a flagship consumer part. The delta of 0% against the RTX 4090 suggests that in the database's aggregate scoring, these two GPUs land in the same performance neighborhood, a remarkable outcome for a professional workstation card.

The RTX A1000 Mobile, by contrast, holds an average benchmark score of 47,743 and sits at the 85th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 48,477 (1.5% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46,702 (2.2% lower), the Intel Arc A530M at 46,614 (2.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46,601 (2.5% lower). The mobile NVIDIA part is clustered with midrange and upper-midrange GPUs, and its position in the database is respectable but not elite. The 3-percentage-point gap in percentile ranking between the two cards (88 vs. 85) understates the actual performance difference, which is much larger in raw scores.

The head-to-head data is unambiguous: the Intel Arc Pro A60 outperforms the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile in every recorded benchmark. The OpenCL margin of 30.4% is particularly notable because it shows the Intel part delivering compute performance far beyond what the NVIDIA mobile chip can muster. Even in Vulkan, where the delta narrows to 22.2%, the result remains a clear-cut victory. No benchmark in the database favors the RTX A1000 Mobile, making this a one-sided comparison from start to finish.

Where Each One Wins

Based on benchmark wins, the Intel Arc Pro A60 wins in both recorded categories: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. This means the Arc Pro A60 is the stronger choice for workloads that leverage OpenCL, such as certain scientific simulations, video encoding pipelines, and compute-accelerated productivity applications. The 30.4% OpenCL advantage suggests that any task offloading parallel arithmetic to the GPU will complete notably faster on the Intel card.

The Arc Pro A60 also wins in Vulkan, which matters for graphics workloads that use this modern API, including game engines with Vulkan render paths, cross-platform CAD visualization, and real-time rendering tools. The 22.2% Vulkan lead indicates that the Intel part handles draw calls, shader execution, and memory-bound graphics operations more efficiently than the NVIDIA mobile part in this API.

The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, despite losing both head-to-head tests, still holds relevance in its own context. Its average benchmark score of 47,743 and 85th percentile ranking place it close to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (1.5% higher) and ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (2.2% lower), Intel Arc A530M (2.4% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 5600M (2.5% lower). For mobile workstations where power draw is a primary constraint, the RTX A1000 Mobile's 60 W TDP represents a specific trade-off: lower performance per the database scores, but a much smaller thermal and power footprint. The Arc Pro A60, with a 130 W TDP, demands more power and cooling, which is feasible in desktop or larger chassis configurations but not in thin mobile workstations.

In terms of production status, the Intel Arc Pro A60 is marked as Active while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile is End-of-life. This matters for procurement decisions: the Intel part is currently available for new designs, whereas the NVIDIA mobile chip has been succeeded by Ada-MW in the database. The RTX A1000 Mobile's predecessor is listed as Quadro Turing-M, giving it a clear lineage, but its end-of-life status means it is no longer a forward-looking option.

For users prioritizing raw compute and graphics throughput, the data points squarely to the Intel Arc Pro A60. For users prioritizing low power consumption and a compact IGP form factor, the RTX A1000 Mobile retains a niche, even if its benchmark scores lag by 22% to 30%.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60,326, compared to 47,743 for the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile.

Q: How large is the performance gap in OpenCL?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 63,485 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 30.4% higher than the RTX A1000 Mobile's 48,703.

Q: Does the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile win any benchmark in the comparison?

A: No. The database records two head-to-head benchmarks, and the Intel Arc Pro A60 wins both: OpenCL by 30.4% and Vulkan by 22.2%.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Pro A60 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in average score?

A: The Arc Pro A60 averages 60,326, while the RTX 4090 averages 60,347, a delta of 0%. They are effectively tied in the database's aggregate scoring.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 is at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile is at the 85th percentile.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile?

A: The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (1.5% higher average score), AMD Radeon RX 6550M (2.2% lower), Intel Arc A530M (2.4% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 5600M (2.5% lower).

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification category. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile uses an 8 nm process at Samsung. The Intel chip, DG2-256, contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The NVIDIA chip, GA107, contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, with a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². Despite the Intel chip having more transistors and a larger die, the NVIDIA chip has a slightly higher transistor density.

Clock speeds also diverge sharply. The Arc Pro A60 runs at a 900 MHz base clock and boosts to 2050 MHz, while the RTX A1000 Mobile has a 630 MHz base clock and a 1140 MHz boost. The memory clocks differ as well: the Intel card uses 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the NVIDIA card uses 1375 MHz with 11 Gbps effective. The Intel part's memory configuration is larger and wider: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, versus 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus delivering 176.0 GB/s.

The compute units also differ. Both GPUs have 2048 shading units, but the Arc Pro A60 has 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs, while the RTX A1000 Mobile has 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs. Both have 16 ray tracing cores, but the NVIDIA part has 64 tensor cores while the Intel part lists none. Pixel rate and texture rate follow the hardware counts: the Arc Pro A60 achieves 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s, while the RTX A1000 Mobile achieves 36.48 GPixel/s and 72.96 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS for Intel and 4.669 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 output is 16.79 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio for Intel, while NVIDIA delivers 4.669 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications differ as well. The Arc Pro A60 has a 130 W TDP and a single-slot form factor, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The RTX A1000 Mobile has a 60 W TDP and is listed as IGP (integrated graphics processor), with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for Intel and PCIe 4.0 x8 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.0 on the Intel card, while the NVIDIA part is portable device dependent. The release dates differ: the Arc Pro A60 launched on 2023-06-05, while the RTX A1000 Mobile launched on 2022-03-29. Production status is Active for Intel and End-of-life for NVIDIA.

Architecture Differences

The architectural lineage of each GPU is distinct. The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist Pro Series generation, and is marketed under the Pro Series branding. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile uses the Ampere architecture, belongs to the Ampere-MW Ax000 generation, and has a documented predecessor of Quadro Turing-M and successor of Ada-MW.

The process node difference carries direct implications for efficiency: Intel taps TSMC 6 nm, while NVIDIA uses Samsung 8 nm. The Intel chip is physically larger at 269 mm² versus 200 mm², and packs more transistors, 11,500 million versus 8,700 million. The transistor densities are close, 42.8M per mm² for Intel and 43.5M per mm² for NVIDIA.

The memory architecture also shows the divergence in design philosophy. The Intel uses 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth; the NVIDIA part uses 4 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 176.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel side also features a larger set of texture units, 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs, versus 64 TMUs and 64 ROPs.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part has 16 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores; NVIDIA has 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores. The Arc Pro A60 supports Advanced VLSI technologies; the NVIDIA part has no tensor cores listed.

Both GPUs feature DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The NVIDIA part is a single-slot form factor, while the RTX A1000 Mobile is a portable device dependent. The NVIDIA part has a DisplayPort 2.0 output on the RTX A1000 Mobile, which is a DisplayPort 2.0 output, while the Intel part has DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The NVIDIA part has DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, while the RTX A1000 Mobile has a DisplayPort 2.0 output. The Intel part has DisplayPort 2.0 outputs; the RTX A1000 Mobile has a DisplayPort 2.0 output.

The NVIDIA part has 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs; the RTX A1000 Mobile has DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The NVIDIA part has 4x DisplayPort 2.0, and the RTX A1000 Mobile has 4x DisplayPort 2.0. The RTX A1000 Mobile has DisplayPort 2.0 outputs; the Arc Pro A60 has DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.