Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro A60 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER occupy vastly different tiers of the graphics hardware spectrum. The data shows a decisive overall performance advantage for the RTX 4080 SUPER, yet the Arc Pro A60 holds specific positions where its architecture and feature set are relevant. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, architecture, and specifications to clarify where each card stands.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data provides a clear-cut split: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER wins every head-to-head test recorded. In the two shared benchmarks—Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan—the RTX 4080 SUPER is faster by a substantial margin. The Arc Pro A60 does not register a single win in the head-to-head comparison, while the RTX 4080 SUPER claims both wins.

However, the Arc Pro A60’s relevance is not defined by raw compute wins. Its score in Geekbench OpenCL is 63,485, which places it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. That percentile rank is actually two points higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 86th percentile, despite the latter’s far higher absolute score. This suggests the Arc Pro A60 is a strong performer within its intended professional segment, even if it cannot compete with the top-tier consumer card.

The RTX 4080 SUPER, with an average benchmark score of 54,209, sits close to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080, which scores 54,247. The delta is a negligible -0.1%, indicating near-identical performance between the two NVIDIA cards. For the Arc Pro A60, its average score of 60,326 places it in close company with the RTX 4090 (60,347) and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140), with deltas of 0% and 0.3% respectively. Thus, the Arc Pro A60’s win condition is efficiency and professional positioning, not absolute speed.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is generational and fundamental. The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation for the Pro Series. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 11,500 million transistors packed into a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm².

In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture, belonging to the GeForce 40 series. It is built on a more advanced 5 nm process, also at TSMC, but with 45,900 million transistors on a larger 379 mm² die. This results in a significantly higher transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The node advantage and chip design give the RTX 4080 SUPER a raw compute ceiling that the Intel part cannot approach.

The memory subsystems diverge sharply. The Arc Pro A60 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4080 SUPER doubles the capacity to 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, with bandwidth nearly doubled to 736.3 GB/s. The RTX 4080 SUPER also features 320 tensor cores and 80 RT cores, whereas the Arc Pro A60 has 16 RT cores and no tensor cores listed. Shading unit counts tell the story: 2,048 for Intel versus 10,240 for NVIDIA.

Power requirements reflect the performance disparity. The Arc Pro A60 is a single-slot card with a 130 W TDP and a suggested 300 W PSU. The RTX 4080 SUPER is a triple-slot card with a 320 W TDP and a suggested 700 W PSU, requiring a 16-pin power connector. The Intel card uses four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, while the NVIDIA card uses one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has a higher average benchmark score of 60,326 compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER’s 54,209. This is an anomaly driven by the specific test suites used, as the RTX 4080 SUPER dominates the head-to-head tests.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to its direct predecessor?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209 on average, while the RTX 4080 scores 54,247. The delta is -0.1%, meaning the SUPER is marginally slower in this dataset, despite being a newer release.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, while the Arc Pro A60 has 12 GB of GDDR6. The NVIDIA card also has a wider 256-bit bus versus the Intel card’s 192-bit bus.

Q: Does the Arc Pro A60 have tensor cores?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists no tensor cores for the Arc Pro A60. The RTX 4080 SUPER has 320 tensor cores, which the Intel card cannot match for AI workloads.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile rank among all GPUs?

A: The Arc Pro A60 is at the 88th percentile, while the RTX 4080 SUPER is at the 86th percentile. This indicates the Intel card is better positioned relative to the full GPU landscape in this particular metric.

Q: What is the RTX 4080 SUPER’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is 999 USD, as stated in the FACT PACK.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets highlight the fundamental design philosophy differences. The RTX 4080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, far higher than the Arc Pro A60’s 900 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost. The NVIDIA card’s memory runs at 1438 MHz with 23 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel card’s memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The compute throughput is lopsided. The RTX 4080 SUPER delivers 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same 52.22 TFLOPS for FP16 (1:1 ratio). The Arc Pro A60 manages 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel and texture rates follow suit: the RTX 4080 SUPER achieves 285.6 GPixel/s and 816.0 GTexel/s, versus 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s for the Intel card.

Physical dimensions differ. The RTX 4080 SUPER is 310 mm long, 140 mm high, and 61 mm wide. The Arc Pro A60 has no listed dimensions but is confirmed as single-slot. The NVIDIA card is triple-slot. Production status also differs: the Arc Pro A60 is marked as Active, while the RTX 4080 SUPER is End-of-life. Release dates are June 5, 2023, for Intel and January 30, 2024, for NVIDIA.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is unambiguous. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Arc Pro A60 scores 63,485, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 219,065. The delta is -71%, meaning the NVIDIA card is 71% faster. This is a massive gap, reflecting the 6.2x difference in FP32 throughput (52.22 TFLOPS versus 8.397 TFLOPS) and the near-doubling of memory bandwidth.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the gap widens further. The Arc Pro A60 scores 57,166, and the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 260,075. The delta is -78%, making the NVIDIA card 78% faster in this test. The Vulkan result is even more lopsided than OpenCL, suggesting the RTX 4080 SUPER’s architecture scales better with the API’s lower-level overhead.

The RTX 4080 SUPER also has additional benchmark data that the Arc Pro A60 lacks. Its Passmark G3D score is 34,245, and its GPU compute score is 19,822. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,600. None of these tests have corresponding scores for the Intel card, so direct comparison is impossible, but the NVIDIA card’s breadth of tested workloads reinforces its versatility.

The wins are 2-0 in favor of the RTX 4080 SUPER. The average delta across both tests is approximately -74.5%, which quantifies the performance chasm. The Arc Pro A60’s higher average score of 60,326 versus 54,209 is misleading; it comes from a different benchmark suite, not from beating the NVIDIA card in any shared test.

The Verdict

The data dictates a straightforward choice for raw performance: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the clear winner. It is 71% faster in OpenCL and 78% faster in Vulkan, with double the memory capacity, 5x the shading units, and a 5 nm process node advantage. Its triple-slot cooler and 320 W TDP are the price of that speed, but for anyone prioritizing frame rates or compute throughput, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the only option between these two.

The Intel Arc Pro A60 is not a competitor to the RTX 4080 SUPER; it is a different product category. Its 88th percentile rank, single-slot design, and 130 W TDP make it suitable for professional environments where space and power are constrained. The four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs suggest a focus on high-resolution display configurations rather than gaming or raw compute. Its average score of 60,326 is respectable, but it only rivals the RTX 4080 SUPER in the abstract, not in any direct test.

Choose the RTX 4080 SUPER if the workload demands maximum speed, larger VRAM (16 GB), or tensor core acceleration. Choose the Arc Pro A60 if the priority is a compact, low-power card for professional display or compute tasks where the RTX 4080 SUPER’s size and power draw are prohibitive. The benchmark results do not support any other conclusion.