GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc Pro A60

CORE STATE DG2-256
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

CORE STATE AD104
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1665 MHz
TDP 110 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
63,485
159,575
geekbench_vulkan
57,166
145,807
passmark_directx_10
N/A
157
passmark_directx_11
N/A
244
passmark_directx_12
N/A
96
passmark_directx_9
N/A
286
passmark_g2d
N/A
929
passmark_g3d
N/A
24,926
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
11,191

Analysis: Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

If analyzing NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU with the Intel Arc Pro A60, a gaming margin grows immediately visible. NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU claims the top spot in almost most test we ran. The difference is notable enough to influence practical graphics results. Players will notice smoother performance. The determination is straightforward.

the Intel Arc Pro A60 has difficulty to keep up with NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU's sheer performance. For value-focused consumers, the Intel Arc Pro A60 might still deliver reasonable results, but people needing premium experience might look toward NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU. The gaming margin is significantly considerable to dismiss. Resource-hungry titles especially demonstrate this disparity. This premium provides rewards in performance.

In-game results across various resolutions repeatedly advantage NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU. From multiplayer titles to demanding releases, NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU holds its advantage. This frame rate consistency in different games demonstrates inherent engineering advantages. Enthusiasts should anticipate strong frame rates regardless of scenario. This flexibility is impressive.

the Intel Arc Pro A60 isn't overlooked altogether, but the frame rate difference versus NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU is challenging to ignore. For value-focused users, the Intel Arc Pro A60 might yet be value assuming the lower price adjusts for its lesser capabilities. However, for peak visual power, NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU is the clear champion. The conclusion is straightforward. Power hunters might gravitate toward NVIDIA RTX 4080 GPU.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro A60
RTX 4080 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
7,424 +262.5%
Shaders
2,048
7,424 +262.5%
TMUs
128
232 +81.3%
ROPs
64
80 +25.0%
SM Count
58
Execution Units
256
Clocks
Base Clock
900 MHz
1290 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1665 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
12,288 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
384.0 GB/s
432.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
133.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS
24.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
386.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
16.79 TFLOPS (2:1)
24.72 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
58 +262.5%
Tensor Cores
232
XMX Cores
256
Power
TDP
130 W
110 W
TDP (W)
130
110 -15.4%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-256
AD104
Generation
Alchemist (Pro Series)
GeForce 40 Mobile
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
11,500 million
35,800 million
Die Size
269 mm²
294 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
42.8M / mm²
121.8M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
IGP
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
View Arc Pro A60 Details View GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile Details