Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro A30M and NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell represent two extremes in the professional GPU landscape. The Arc Pro A30M is an end-of-life, mobile-oriented entry point, while the RTX PRO 4500 is an active, high-end desktop solution. Despite their vast differences in size, power, and memory, benchmark aggregation places them in a surprisingly close overall standing. The data shows that while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell dominates in raw compute and modern API performance, the Arc Pro A30M edges out a narrow victory in average benchmark scores, creating a fascinating comparison for builders evaluating their options.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most direct comparison between these two cards comes from their average benchmark scores. The Intel Arc Pro A30M achieves an average score of 31,894, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell posts an average of 31,532. This puts the Intel card 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA card, a margin that is nearly negligible in real-world terms but notable given the massive disparity in their specifications. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, in turn, trails the Arc Pro A30M by -1.1% in its rival list, confirming that these two are closely matched in this specific aggregate metric.

Looking at the broader competitive landscape, the Arc Pro A30M also faces the NVIDIA TITAN RTX, which scores 31,676. Here, the Intel card is 0.7% ahead. It also compares to the AMD Radeon Pro 570X at 32,176, where the Intel part trails by -0.9%. For the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX at 31,676, where it trails by -0.5%, and the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q at 31,220, where it is 1% ahead. This data suggests that both cards occupy a similar performance tier in general compute workloads, despite their architectural differences.

However, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell reveals its true strengths in specific, modern benchmark suites. In the Geekbench Vulkan test, it scores an impressive 221,768 points. In the Passmark G3D test, it achieves 33,360 points, and in the Passmark GPU Compute test, it scores 19,255 points. These are substantial numbers that indicate strong performance in graphics and compute tasks. The Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, only has a single benchmark listed: Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 31,894. Without a Vulkan score or other comparable data points, the Intel card's performance in these areas remains unquantified, making a direct feature-by-feature comparison difficult. The data available clearly shows the NVIDIA card is built for high-throughput, modern workloads, while the Intel card's single score represents a more general compute capability.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two GPUs is vast. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-128 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation for Pro-Series Mobile. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors packed into a 157 mm² die. This results in a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². In contrast, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on the GB203 chip, and is part of the Blackwell PRO W generation. It is manufactured on a more advanced 5 nm process at TSMC, with a massive 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, achieving a density of 120.6M per mm².

These differences translate into vastly different core configurations. The Intel chip carries 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 ray tracing cores. It has no dedicated tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA chip, by comparison, is a powerhouse with 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It also features 82 ray tracing cores and 328 tensor cores, making it a far more capable processor for AI-assisted and ray-traced workloads. The Intel card's FP32 compute is rated at 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1). The NVIDIA card's FP32 performance is a staggering 50.53 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 50.53 TFLOPS but at a 1:1 ratio, indicating a much higher sustained compute throughput for both precision levels.

The memory subsystems are equally divergent. The Intel Arc Pro A30M uses 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. This represents a 7x increase in memory capacity and a 7x increase in bandwidth. The NVIDIA card also supports a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the Intel card uses the older PCIe 4.0 x8. In terms of API support, both cards claim DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, though the NVIDIA card's raw hardware capabilities are clearly in a different league.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the data, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell wins decisively in areas requiring massive compute throughput and memory capacity. Its 50.53 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 32 GB of VRAM make it the obvious choice for large-scale 3D rendering, high-resolution video editing, complex scientific simulations, and AI model training where tensor cores are essential. Its 82 RT cores provide a robust foundation for ray-traced workflows. The Passmark G3D score of 33,360 and Vulkan score of 221,768 further underscore its strength in modern graphics APIs and demanding applications.

The Intel Arc Pro A30M, with its 50 W TDP and 4 GB of memory, wins in scenarios where power efficiency and portability are paramount. Its end-of-life status and mobile-oriented design suggest it was intended for compact workstations or laptops where space and thermal headroom are limited. Its single Geekbench OpenCL score of 31,894 shows it can handle basic compute tasks, but its smaller memory footprint and lower core count limit its utility in high-end professional workloads. The Intel card's advantage lies in its simplicity and low power draw, making it suitable for basic rendering, light CAD, or as a display adapter in power-constrained environments. It does not win in any performance benchmark listed, but it presents a viable option for users with modest needs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro A30M | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Chip | DG2-128 | GB203 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 7,200 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 157 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 1635 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2407 MHz |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 32 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus | 64 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 10496 |

| TMUs | 64 | 328 |

| ROPs | 32 | 112 |

| RT Cores | 8 | 82 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 328 |

| Pixel Rate | 64.00 GPixel/s | 269.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 128.0 GTexel/s | 789.5 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 4.096 TFLOPS | 50.53 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) | 50.53 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 50 W | 200 W |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2022-08-07 | 2025-03-17 |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A30M has a higher average benchmark score of 31,894, which is 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's average of 31,532.

Q: How much more memory does the NVIDIA card have?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory, which is 28 GB more than the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A30M has a TDP of 50 W, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has a TDP of 200 W, a difference of 150 W.

Q: Which card is better for ray tracing based on core count?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 82 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M has only 8, so the NVIDIA card is significantly more capable for ray tracing workloads.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc Pro A30M and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which card is currently in production?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is marked as Active in production, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M is listed as End-of-life.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the superior product for professional work that demands raw power, high memory capacity, and modern features. Its 50.53 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 32 GB of VRAM are non-negotiable requirements for heavy 3D rendering, large dataset processing, and AI development. The inclusion of 328 tensor cores and 82 RT cores makes it a future-proof investment for a workstation. Its high Passmark G3D score of 33,360 and Vulkan score of 221,768 confirm its dominance in current-generation applications.

The Intel Arc Pro A30M, despite its lower specifications, holds its own in the aggregate benchmark average. Its 31,894 average score is slightly higher than the NVIDIA card's, but this is likely due to the specific tests run. Its 50 W TDP makes it an incredibly efficient part, suitable for compact systems where power and heat are critical concerns. However, its 4 GB of memory and 4.096 TFLOPS of compute performance are limiting factors for any serious professional workload. The choice is straightforward: those who need performance should pick the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, while those who need a low-power, basic compute solution for a mobile or space-constrained system could consider the Intel Arc Pro A30M.