Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Comparison

# Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

The data presents a stark contrast between two very different GPUs, separated by process technology, design philosophy, and intended workload. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, a desktop flagship from the GeForce 20 generation, utterly dominates the single shared benchmark, scoring 128,171 in Geekbench OpenCL against the Intel Arc Pro A30M’s 31,894. That is a 75.1% deficit for the Intel part. However, the Arc Pro A30M is a mobile, professional-grade solution with a 50 W TDP, while the RTX 2080 Ti is a 250 W desktop card that launched at 999 USD. The benchmark results indicate that these products serve entirely different purposes, and the choice between them hinges on whether raw compute throughput or power-constrained portability is the priority.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is the clear performance winner. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 128,171 is roughly four times higher than the Intel Arc Pro A30M’s 31,894, and it holds a 75.1% advantage in that head-to-head comparison. The RTX 2080 Ti also sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, while the Arc Pro A30M is at the 76th percentile, meaning they are statistically similar in overall ranking despite the massive raw score gap. This paradox suggests that the Intel part’s percentile is buoyed by its efficiency class, not its absolute performance.

The RTX 2080 Ti is for users who need maximum compute power in a fixed desktop environment. It offers 13.45 TFLOPS FP32, 11 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 352-bit bus with 616.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 68 RT cores. The Arc Pro A30M, by contrast, is for professionals who require a capable GPU in a mobile form factor with a 50 W TDP and no power connectors. It delivers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32, 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 128.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 8 RT cores. The data does not support a single "winner" — it supports two distinct winners for two distinct use cases.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is generational and philosophical. The Intel Arc Pro A30M uses the Xe-HPG architecture on a DG2-128 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It packs 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti uses the Turing architecture on a TU102 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process, also at TSMC. It contains 18,600 million transistors across a massive 754 mm² die, with a density of 24.7 million per square millimeter. The Intel part is over four times denser per area, reflecting the newer process node.

The RTX 2080 Ti’s Turing architecture includes 544 tensor cores and 68 RT cores, while the Arc Pro A30M has 8 RT cores and no tensor cores listed. The shading unit count is also lopsided: 4,352 vs 1,024. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists. However, the internal execution resources are vastly different. The Intel chip’s 6 nm process and 50 W TDP indicate a design focused on efficiency per watt, whereas the RTX 2080 Ti’s 12 nm process and 250 W TDP prioritize sheer throughput. The transistor density difference (45.9M vs 24.7M per mm²) quantifies how much more compact Intel’s design is, while the RTX 2080 Ti uses its larger die budget to field nearly 4.3 times the shading units.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark in the data is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is decisive. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 128,171, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 31,894. The delta is -75.1% for the Intel part. In absolute terms, the RTX 2080 Ti is 96,277 points ahead. This is not a close contest; it is a rout. The RTX 2080 Ti’s FP32 throughput of 13.45 TFLOPS dwarfs the Arc Pro A30M’s 4.096 TFLOPS, and its texture rate of 420.2 GTexel/s versus 128.0 GTexel/s further illustrates the gap.

The RTX 2080 Ti also has a pixel rate of 136.0 GPixel/s against the Intel part’s 64.00 GPixel/s, and its memory bandwidth of 616.0 GB/s is nearly five times the Arc Pro A30M’s 128.0 GB/s. The benchmark data reflects these specifications. The Intel part’s nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (avg score 31,676, delta 0.7%) and the AMD Radeon Pro 570X (avg score 32,176, delta -0.9%), placing it in a performance class that is nowhere near the RTX 2080 Ti’s neighborhood. Conversely, the RTX 2080 Ti’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (avg score 29,928, delta -0.5%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (avg score 30,095, delta -1%), showing that its average benchmark score of 29,783 is competitive with modern mid-range parts — but that average is dragged down by its numerous other benchmark tests, not the OpenCL result.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Intel Arc Pro A30M uses a 6 nm process, while the RTX 2080 Ti uses 12 nm. Transistor count is 7,200 million versus 18,600 million, and die size is 157 mm² versus 754 mm². The Arc Pro A30M has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs; the RTX 2080 Ti has 4,352 shading units, 272 TMUs, and 88 ROPs. RT cores are 8 versus 68, and tensor cores are absent on the Intel part versus 544 on the NVIDIA part. Base clocks are 1500 MHz versus 1350 MHz, with boost clocks of 2000 MHz versus 1545 MHz — the Intel part actually runs faster per clock, but has far fewer execution units.

Memory is another major divider. The Arc Pro A30M has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus at 16 Gbps effective, delivering 128.0 GB/s. The RTX 2080 Ti has 11 GB of GDDR6 on a 352-bit bus at 14 Gbps effective, delivering 616.0 GB/s. TDP is 50 W versus 250 W, and power connectors are "None" on the Intel part versus 2x 8-pin on the NVIDIA part. The RTX 2080 Ti is dual-slot, 267 mm long, 116 mm tall, and 35 mm wide, while the Arc Pro A30M lists no dimensions and is described as "Portable Device Dependent" for display outputs. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. The RTX 2080 Ti has a launch MSRP of 999 USD; the Intel part has none listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 128,171, compared to the Intel Arc Pro A30M’s 31,894, a 75.1% difference in favor of NVIDIA.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A30M has a 50 W TDP and requires no power connectors, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti has a 250 W TDP and requires 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Are these GPUs from the same generation?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is from the Alchemist (Pro-Series Mobile) generation, released 2022-08-07, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is from the GeForce 20 generation, released 2018-09-19.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti offers 616.0 GB/s across a 352-bit bus, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M provides 128.0 GB/s across a 64-bit bus.

Q: Do both support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the transistor count difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A30M has 7,200 million transistors, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti has 18,600 million transistors.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti wins decisively in raw compute performance. The Geekbench OpenCL result of 128,171 versus 31,894 is the headline, but the underlying specifications tell the same story: 13.45 TFLOPS FP32 versus 4.096 TFLOPS, 420.2 GTexel/s versus 128.0 GTexel/s, and 136.0 GPixel/s versus 64.00 GPixel/s. Its 11 GB memory capacity and 616.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large datasets, high-resolution textures, or any workload that saturates memory. The 68 RT cores and 544 tensor cores give it hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI inference that the Intel part cannot match. For any fixed desktop workstation where power draw is irrelevant, this is the obvious choice.

The Intel Arc Pro A30M wins in efficiency and portability. Its 50 W TDP requires no auxiliary power connectors, meaning it can slot into mobile or low-power systems where the RTX 2080 Ti’s 250 W TDP and 2x 8-pin connectors would be impossible. Its 6 nm process and 45.9M transistors per mm² density show a modern, compact design. The boost clock of 2000 MHz is higher than the RTX 2080 Ti’s 1545 MHz, suggesting that per-clock efficiency is a strength. It also supports PCIe 4.0 x8, a newer bus standard than the RTX 2080 Ti’s PCIe 3.0 x16, which may matter for data transfer in constrained systems. The Arc Pro A30M’s nearest rivals (NVIDIA TITAN RTX, AMD Radeon Pro 570X) are all in the same performance band, confirming its niche as a professional mobile part rather than a performance leader. The data suggests neither product is a substitute for the other — they are answers to different questions.