Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries hold an identical percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs, which places them at the midpoint of the recorded performance distribution, but this parity in percentile does not stem from any shared workload results. The Intel part carries an average benchmark score of 0, and the Lisuan Tech part also carries an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no measured performance data has been logged for either product in the current database state.

The absence of head-to-head scores means the available comparison must rely entirely on architectural specifications and computed throughput rates. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile delivers 2.355 TFLOPS. That difference represents a factor of roughly 10.4, a substantial gap in raw shading throughput. Texture fill rates tell a similar story: the Lisuan part reaches 384.0 GTexel/s against 73.60 GTexel/s for the Intel part, a 5.2-fold advantage. Pixel throughput favors the Lisuan product as well, with 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 36.80 GPixel/s, a 5.2-fold margin.

Memory bandwidth creates the widest separation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile relies on System Shared memory, with bandwidth listed as System Dependent, meaning no fixed figure exists for direct comparison. The discrete memory subsystem of the Lisuan part provides a concrete, dedicated bandwidth figure, whereas the Intel solution shares system memory resources without a specified throughput value.

The FP16 rates follow the same pattern as FP32. Lisuan Tech records 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), while Intel records 4.710 TFLOPS (2:1), again a roughly 10.4-fold gap. Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so API feature levels match at the highest DirectX tier. Vulkan support differs slightly: Intel lists 1.4, while Lisuan lists 1.3.

Neither product has recorded wins in the database. The wins counter for Intel stands at 0, and the wins counter for Lisuan also stands at 0. With no benchmark entries, the percentile value of 50 for both appears to be a default midpoint rather than a derived ranking from actual scores. This means the relative standing of these two products cannot be validated through measured results, only through specification analysis.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records 24.58 TFLOPS, while the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile records 2.355 TFLOPS. The Lisuan part holds a 10.4-fold advantage in raw single-precision throughput.

Q: How much memory does each product use?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO carries 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and draws from system memory.

Q: What are the thermal design power figures?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has a 25 W TDP and uses no power connectors.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile includes 4 RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists no RT core count in its specifications, so no ray tracing hardware is recorded for that part.

Q: What is the manufacturing process for each chip?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm process at Intel. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Which product has higher texture and pixel fill rates?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO achieves 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile achieves 73.60 GTexel/s and 36.80 GPixel/s. The Lisuan part leads by 5.2-fold in both metrics.

Architecture Differences

The two products diverge at nearly every architectural layer. Intel builds the Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile on the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Panther Lake chip, fabricated on a 3 nm node at Intel. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip, part of the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm node at TSMC. Process geometry favors Intel by a full node step, yet the Lisuan part compensates with a much larger execution resource pool.

Shader configuration differs sharply. Intel allocates 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. Lisuan scales that to 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Lisuan part fields 12 times the shader count, 6 times the TMU count, and 6 times the ROP count. These ratios explain the throughput deltas: the Lisuan part's 24.58 TFLOPS versus Intel's 2.355 TFLOPS aligns closely with the 12x shading unit difference, and the 5.2x texture/pixel rate advantage aligns with the 6x TMU and ROP counts.

Ray tracing hardware appears only on the Intel side, which lists 4 RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records no RT core specification, suggesting either absent hardware or an unlisted implementation. This gives Intel a feature-level advantage in ray-traced workloads if software supports the Xe3-LPG path, though the raw compute deficit remains large.

Memory architecture could not be more different. Intel integrates the GPU as an IGP with System Shared memory, no bus width specification, and bandwidth described only as System Dependent. Lisuan implements a discrete card with 24 GB of GDDR6, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s of fixed bandwidth. The discrete design provides predictable memory performance, while the Intel IGP depends entirely on the host system's memory configuration.

Clock behavior also differs. Intel specifies a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. Lisuan lists no base or boost clock for the core, but specifies memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer. The Intel memory clock is listed as System Shared, meaning no dedicated memory clock exists.

Power delivery separates the products further. Intel operates at 25 W with no power connectors and an IGP slot width, suited for mobile integration. Lisuan operates at 225 W, uses a Dual-slot cooler, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The physical footprint of the Lisuan card measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Intel lists no dimensions because the IGP format has no add-in card presence.

Display outputs follow the same pattern. Intel lists Portable Device Dependent outputs, reflecting its mobile IGP nature. Lisuan provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a connections, a fixed desktop output configuration.

The Verdict

The database shows two products with fundamentally different design targets. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile operates as a 25 W integrated GPU in the Panther Lake mobile platform, designed to share system memory and fit into portable devices. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO operates as a 225 W discrete dual-slot card with dedicated 24 GB GDDR6 memory, a 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested power supply. The performance specifications align with these roles: Lisuan leads by 10.4x in FP32, 5.2x in texture and pixel throughput, and offers a fixed 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth versus Intel's system-dependent shared memory.

The Intel part counters with a smaller process node (3 nm versus 6 nm), a lower 25 W power draw, dedicated RT cores, and Vulkan 1.4 support versus Lisuan's 1.3. For battery-constrained mobile workloads where the GPU must coexist with a CPU in a shared thermal envelope, the Intel IGP presents the only viable option. For compute-heavy desktop tasks that demand maximum throughput and dedicated memory, the Lisuan part holds every measured performance metric.

The absence of benchmark scores means the verdict rests on specifications alone, but the specification gap is decisive. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the higher-performance product by every recorded throughput figure. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is the lower-power, mobile-optimized product with ray tracing support and a newer process node. Neither product can substitute for the other in its intended usage class.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Panther Lake | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 512 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 32 | 192 |

| ROPs | 16 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 4 | Not listed |

| Pixel Rate | 36.80 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 73.60 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 2.355 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 4.710 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2026-03-16 |

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in every raw performance metric recorded. FP32 compute favors it by 10.4x, FP16 by the same margin, texture fill by 5.2x, pixel throughput by 5.2x, and memory bandwidth by a fixed 432.0 GB/s versus a system-dependent value. The 24 GB GDDR6 capacity on a 192-bit bus provides a dedicated memory pool that the Intel IGP cannot match, since the latter shares system memory with no specified bandwidth. The dual-slot card format with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs suits fixed desktop workstations that need multiple external displays. The 225 W TDP and 16-pin connector indicate a power-hungry but fully provisioned discrete solution. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface gives it a direct connection path to the host, independent of CPU-integrated memory traffic.

The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile wins on integration efficiency and feature completeness. The 3 nm process node represents the smaller manufacturing geometry, which contributes to the 25 W TDP, a 200 W lower power draw than the Lisuan part. The IGP slot width and absence of power connectors make it suitable for thin mobile devices where space and cooling are constrained. The 4 RT cores provide dedicated ray tracing hardware that the Lisuan part does not list. Vulkan 1.4 support exceeds the Lisuan part's 1.3. The 300 MHz base clock and 2300 MHz boost clock give it defined operating points, whereas the Lisuan core clocks remain unspecified. The system-shared memory approach eliminates the need for separate VRAM allocation, simplifying memory management in portable devices.

For compute-bound workloads like rendering or simulation that scale with shader throughput, the Lisuan part's 24.58 TFLOPS dominates. For bandwidth-sensitive tasks that require large working sets, the 432.0 GB/s of GDDR6 outperforms any system-shared configuration. For ray-traced graphics in a low-power mobile chassis, the Intel part's RT cores and 25 W envelope provide capability the Lisuan card cannot offer in that form factor. The release dates place Intel shipping in January 2026 and Lisuan in March 2026, so the Intel product arrived earlier in the recorded timeline. Each product wins in its designated environment: the Lisuan Tech LX PRO for maximum measured throughput, the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile for mobile integration and ray tracing support.