Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an extreme asymmetry between the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The Intel part, an integrated graphics processor built on the Wildcat Lake chip, has no benchmark entries in the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, a discrete Ada Lovelace card, carries an average benchmark score of 37,648 across ten recorded tests. The Intel processor's average benchmark score is 0. This is not a close contest; the NVIDIA card dominates every measurable metric.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 produces 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS. Converting the Intel figure to TFLOPS yields 1.28 TFLOPS, which places it roughly 22 times behind the NVIDIA card in raw single-precision throughput. The texture rate tells the same story: the RTX 4070 reaches 455.4 GTexel/s, while the Intel part manages 40.00 GTexel/s, an 11-fold gap. Pixel throughput is similarly lopsided, with the NVIDIA card at 158.4 GPixel/s versus the Intel chip's 20.00 GPixel/s.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive split. The RTX 4070 uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with bandwidth listed as system dependent, which means it has no dedicated memory bus width and no fixed bandwidth figure. The NVIDIA card's 504.2 GB/s is a fixed, dedicated resource, while the Intel part must share system memory, a structural disadvantage that no driver optimization can fully offset.

The RTX 4070 also holds a substantial advantage in execution resources. It packs 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The Intel chip has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The ratio is roughly 23:1 in shading units, 11.5:1 in TMUs, and 8:1 in ROPs. Ray tracing hardware follows the same pattern: the NVIDIA card has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, while the Intel part has just 2 RT cores and no tensor core count listed. The RTX 4070's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1), whereas the Intel chip's FP16 is 2.560 TFLOPS (2:1), meaning the Intel part's FP16 rate is actually half its FP32 when accounting for the 2:1 ratio.

The database's percentile placement reinforces the gap. The RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile sits at the 50th percentile. The NVIDIA card's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (average score 37,628, delta 0.1 percent), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37,507, delta 0.4 percent), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135, delta -1.3 percent), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37,157, delta 1.3 percent). These rival deltas are all within roughly 1.3 percent of the RTX 4070's score, showing that the NVIDIA card is tightly clustered with other mid-range discrete parts. The Intel integrated chip has no nearest rivals listed, as its score of 0 places it in a category occupied only by itself in the database.

The clock speeds narrow the gap only slightly. The Intel part boosts to 2500 MHz versus the RTX 4070's 2475 MHz, but the NVIDIA card's massive parallel width overwhelms any clock advantage. The base clocks differ significantly: the Intel chip runs at 300 MHz, while the RTX 4070 idles at 1920 MHz. The boost clocks are close, but the base clock delta of 1,620 MHz suggests the Intel part spends far more time at low frequencies under load, which explains its dramatically lower throughput despite a nominally similar boost figure.

The Verdict

The data leaves no ambiguity. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the clear performance leader across every recorded metric, with an average benchmark score of 37,648 versus 0 for the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. The RTX 4070 holds the 81st percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile with no benchmark entries. Anyone selecting a GPU for compute-heavy tasks, gaming, or content creation should choose the RTX 4070 based strictly on the measured data.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, designed for portable devices where power draw is the primary constraint. Its system shared memory and IGP bus interface indicate it is not intended to compete with discrete cards. The RTX 4070, by contrast, is a 200 W dual-slot card requiring a 550 W power supply and a 1x 16-pin connector, making it a component for desktop builds with adequate cooling and power delivery. The Intel part's production status is active, while the RTX 4070 is end-of-life, but that status difference does not change the performance hierarchy.

The RTX 4070's FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS, texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s, and pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s dwarf the Intel chip's corresponding figures of 1,280.0 GFLOPS, 40.00 GTexel/s, and 20.00 GPixel/s. The memory bandwidth gap is even more pronounced, with the RTX 4070's dedicated 504.2 GB/s versus the Intel part's system-dependent shared memory. For any workload that stresses the GPU, the RTX 4070 is the only viable option from the data.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in FP32 compute?

A: The RTX 4070 produces 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS, which equals 1.28 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card is roughly 22 times faster in single-precision throughput.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile have dedicated video memory?

A: No. Its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system shared or system dependent. The RTX 4070 uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has a TDP of 200 W. The RTX 4070 also requires a 550 W suggested power supply and a 1x 16-pin connector, whereas the Intel part uses no power connectors and is an IGP.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The RTX 4070 has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The NVIDIA card has roughly 23 times more shading units, 11.5 times more TMUs, and 8 times more ROPs.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU in the database?

A: The RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,648. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile sits at the 50th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no benchmark entries.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 4070 has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has 2 RT cores and no tensor core count listed, making the NVIDIA card's ray tracing hardware substantially more capable.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every hardware specification recorded in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the RTX 4070 uses a 5 nm node from TSMC. The RTX 4070 has a die size of 294 mm² with 35,800 million transistors and a transistor density of 121.8M per mm²; the Intel part lists its transistor count and die size as unknown.

Clock behavior diverges sharply. The Intel chip has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The RTX 4070 has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared, while the RTX 4070's memory clock is 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective. The bus interface differs completely: the Intel part uses IGP, while the RTX 4070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Physical dimensions are only available for the RTX 4070: 240 mm in length (9.4 inches), 110 mm in height (4.3 inches), and 40 mm in width (1.6 inches), with a dual-slot width. The Intel part's slot width is listed as IGP with no dimensions. Power delivery also differs: the RTX 4070 uses a 1x 16-pin connector with a 550 W suggested PSU, while the Intel part has no power connectors. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the Intel chip, whereas the RTX 4070 offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The production status and release dates differ as well. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is active and released on 2026-04-15, with HD Graphics-M as its predecessor. The RTX 4070 is end-of-life, released on 2023-04-11, with GeForce 30 as its predecessor and GeForce 50 as its successor. The RTX 4070 has a launch MSRP of 599 USD; the Intel part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on the Wildcat Lake chip, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD104 chip, part of the GeForce 40 generation. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical, but the underlying designs are entirely different.

The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor with 2 RT cores and no tensor cores, designed for the Arc Graphics-M mobile segment. The RTX 4070 is a discrete card with 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, built for desktop performance. The Intel chip's FP16 output of 2.560 TFLOPS uses a 2:1 ratio, meaning it processes half the FP32 rate. The RTX 4070's FP16 output of 29.15 TFLOPS uses a 1:1 ratio, matching its FP32 throughput exactly. This makes the RTX 4070's FP16 capability 11.4 times greater than the Intel part's.

The memory architecture is the most consequential difference. The RTX 4070 uses dedicated GDDR6X memory with a 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with no dedicated bus width and bandwidth that depends on the host system. This means the RTX 4070's memory performance is consistent and predictable, while the Intel part's memory performance varies with the system it is embedded in. The Intel chip's 25 W TDP reflects its integrated, low-power design, while the RTX 4070's 200 W TDP reflects its discrete, high-performance positioning. The transistor density of 121.8M per mm² on the RTX 4070, combined with its 294 mm² die, indicates a dense compute-focused design; the Intel part's transistor count is unknown, but its 3 nm process node suggests a modern, power-efficient fabrication.