Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark runs between the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, so a direct per-test comparison is not possible from recorded measurements. Instead, the available data must be interpreted through the NVIDIA GPU's standalone benchmark results and its position relative to other professional GPUs in the database.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,579.5. In Geekbench compute workloads, it reaches 254,116 in OpenCL and 282,631 in Vulkan. These results place the GPU at the 98th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 182,109 across its recorded tests.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has zero recorded benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile ranking sits at 50, and its average benchmark score is 0. The absence of measured performance data means no head-to-head deltas can be computed for either GPU. The wins counter stands at 0 for both parts.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's nearest rivals provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB averages 183,725, which is 0.9% below the RTX PRO 5000's average. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 184,664, or 1.4% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D trails by 2.3% with a score of 178,050. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB posts 187,147, which is 2.7% above the RTX PRO 5000's average.

These deltas indicate the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell sits in a tight performance cluster at the top of the database. The spread between the lowest rival (RTX 4090 D at 178,050) and the highest (A100 SXM4 40 GB at 187,147) is only about 5.1%. Within this group, the RTX PRO 5000 lands slightly below the A100 40 GB and slightly above the RTX 4090 D.

The Intel part's 50th percentile ranking is a database artifact of having no recorded benchmarks, not a measured performance level. The 3 nm Wildcat Lake integrated GPU with 128 shading units cannot be numerically compared against the 14,080 shading units of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell using recorded data. Any attempt to quantify the performance gap would require benchmark entries that do not exist in the database.

What the data does show is that the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell belongs to an elite tier of GPUs, sitting within 3% of the A100 SXM4 variants and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, by contrast, has no measurable presence in the benchmark database at all.

The Verdict

The data supports only one conclusion: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a high-end professional GPU with recorded benchmark scores in the 98th percentile, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded performance data whatsoever.

For users selecting a GPU based on database measurements, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell delivers verified performance across DirectX 12, OpenCL, and Vulkan workloads. Its average benchmark score of 182,109 places it among the fastest GPUs in the database, within 2.7% of the A100 SXM4 40 GB and ahead of the RTX 4090 D by 2.3%.

The Intel part cannot be recommended on the basis of measured performance because no measurements exist. Its 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output units suggest a fundamentally different performance class, but the database provides no scores to confirm this.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 48 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth, combined with 14,080 shading units and 110 ray tracing cores, gives it the resources for demanding professional workloads. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, making its memory performance variable and dependent on the host platform.

The launch MSRP for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 5,099 USD. The Intel part has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell wins in every category where recorded data exists. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,579.5 demonstrates strong DirectX 12 Ultimate performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 254,116 and Vulkan score of 282,631 confirm compute capability across multiple APIs.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration, based on specification data. Its 25 W TDP versus the RTX PRO 5000's 300 W TDP represents a substantial difference in power draw. The Intel part is an integrated GPU (IGP) with no power connectors and no suggested PSU, while the RTX PRO 5000 requires a 700 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin power connector.

The Intel part also wins on physical footprint. As an IGP, it occupies no expansion slot, whereas the RTX PRO 5000 is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

For systems requiring a discrete GPU with dedicated memory, the RTX PRO 5000's 48 GB of GDDR7 is the clear choice. For ultra-portable or low-power designs where integrated graphics suffice, the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile offers a 3 nm integrated solution with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The RTX PRO 5000's 1.34 TB/s memory bandwidth dwarfs the system dependent bandwidth of the Intel part. The NVIDIA GPU's 380.3 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,045.9 GTexel/s texture rate compare to the Intel part's 9.2 GPixel/s and 18.4 GTexel/s.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has recorded benchmark scores: 9,579.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 254,116 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 282,631 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 182,109. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average is 0.

Q: How does the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The database shows the RTX PRO 5000's average score of 182,109 is 0.9% below the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.4% below the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, 2.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D, and 2.7% below the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each GPU?

A: The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with system shared type, bus width, and system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a 25 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has a 300 W TDP, requires a 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 700 W.

Q: What process nodes are used by each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm process at Intel foundry. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 14,080 shading units. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 128 shading units.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is built on the Xe3-LPG architecture using the Wildcat Lake chip. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation and uses a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU includes 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, 4 raster output units, and 1 ray tracing core. It has no tensor cores listed in the database.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip. It is part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation and uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². The GPU features 14,080 shading units, 440 texture mapping units, 160 raster output units, 110 ray tracing cores, and 440 tensor cores.

Both GPUs support the same API level: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses an IGP bus interface.

The Intel part is a mobile integrated GPU with no power connectors and no suggested PSU, designed for portable devices. The RTX PRO 5000 is a dual-slot discrete card with a 16-pin power connector and a 700 W suggested PSU.

The predecessor relationships differ as well. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile succeeds the HD Graphics-M. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell succeeds the Workstation Ada generation.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs in the database:

• Chip: Intel uses Wildcat Lake; NVIDIA uses GB202.
• Architecture: Intel uses Xe3-LPG; NVIDIA uses Blackwell 2.0.
• Generation: Intel uses Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake); NVIDIA uses Blackwell PRO W (x000).
• Process Node: Intel uses 3 nm; NVIDIA uses 5 nm.
• Foundry: Intel uses Intel; NVIDIA uses TSMC.
• Transistors: Intel is unknown; NVIDIA has 92,200 million.
• Die Size: Intel is unknown; NVIDIA has 750 mm².
• Transistor Density: Intel is null; NVIDIA has 122.9M per mm².
• Base Clock: Intel has 300 MHz; NVIDIA has 1740 MHz.
• Boost Clock: Intel has 2300 MHz; NVIDIA has 2377 MHz.
• Memory Clock: Intel uses system shared; NVIDIA has 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective.
• Memory Size: Intel uses system shared; NVIDIA has 48 GB.
• Memory Type: Intel uses system shared; NVIDIA uses GDDR7.
• Memory Bus Width: Intel uses system shared; NVIDIA uses 384 bit.
• Memory Bandwidth: Intel uses system dependent; NVIDIA has 1.34 TB/s.
• Shading Units: Intel has 128; NVIDIA has 14,080.
• TMUs: Intel has 8; NVIDIA has 440.
• ROPs: Intel has 4; NVIDIA has 160.
• RT Cores: Intel has 1; NVIDIA has 110.
• Tensor Cores: Intel is null; NVIDIA has 440.
• Pixel Rate: Intel has 9.2 GPixel/s; NVIDIA has 380.3 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: Intel has 18.4 GTexel/s; NVIDIA has 1,045.9 GTexel/s.
• FP32 Performance: Intel has 588.8 GFLOPS; NVIDIA has 66.94 TFLOPS.
• FP16 Performance: Intel has 1,177.6 GFLOPS (2:1); NVIDIA has 66.94 TFLOPS (1:1).
• TDP: Intel has 25 W; NVIDIA has 300 W.
• Slot Width: Intel is IGP; NVIDIA is dual-slot.
• Power Connectors: Intel has none; NVIDIA has 1x 16-pin.
• Suggested PSU: Intel is null; NVIDIA has 700 W.
• Bus Interface: Intel uses IGP; NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16.
• Display Outputs: Intel uses portable device dependent; NVIDIA uses 4x DisplayPort 2.1b.
• Dimensions: Intel has no recorded length, height, or width; NVIDIA has 267 mm length, 111 mm height, 40 mm width.
• Release Date: Intel released 2026-04-15; NVIDIA released 2025-03-17.
• Predecessor: Intel succeeds HD Graphics-M; NVIDIA succeeds Workstation Ada.
• Launch MSRP: Intel has none; NVIDIA has 5,099 USD.
• Benchmark Scores: Intel has none; NVIDIA has 9,579.5 (3DMark), 254,116 (OpenCL), 282,631 (Vulkan).
• Percentile: Intel is 50; NVIDIA is 98.
• Average Benchmark Score: Intel is 0; NVIDIA is 182,109.