Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile occupy entirely different positions in the database. The RTX 4090 D carries an average benchmark score of 178050 across its recorded tests, while the Intel part has no benchmark entries and an average score of 0. This places the NVIDIA card in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, whereas the Intel integrated solution sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects its role as a baseline integrated processor rather than a discrete performance part.

In the three recorded benchmark tests, the RTX 4090 D delivers 8587 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 278621 points in Geekbench OpenCL, and 246941 points in Geekbench Vulkan. These figures confirm that the card is a top-tier component in the database, with its nearest rivals trailing by small margins. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell records an average score of 182109, which is 2.2% higher than the RTX 4090 D. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183725, a 3.1% advantage. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 184664, coming in 3.6% higher. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB leads the group with 187147, which is 4.9% ahead of the RTX 4090 D. These delta percentages show that the RTX 4090 D sits just below a cluster of professional-grade accelerators, but the differences are small enough that the card remains highly competitive in raw compute tasks.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no comparable benchmark scores in the database, so a direct head-to-head numerical comparison is impossible. What the data does show is that the Intel part is an integrated graphics processor with 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output units. The RTX 4090 D has 14592 shading units, 456 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The shading unit count alone indicates that the NVIDIA card has over 100 times the raw shader processing capacity. The FP32 compute rate for the RTX 4090 D is 73.54 TFLOPS, while the Intel part manages 588.8 GFLOPS. That is a difference of roughly 125 times in single-precision floating-point throughput. The pixel rate tells a similar story: the NVIDIA card outputs 443.5 GPixel/s, while the Intel integrated solution outputs 9.200 GPixel/s. Texture rate follows the same pattern, with the RTX 4090 D reaching 1,149.1 GTexel/s versus 18.40 GTexel/s for the Intel part.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile does include one ray tracing core and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, so it is not without modern rendering features. However, the RTX 4090 D includes 114 ray tracing cores and 456 tensor cores, which gives it a substantial advantage in both ray-traced workloads and AI-accelerated tasks. The FP16 performance for the NVIDIA card is 73.54 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part reaches 1,177.6 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card also uses a 24 GB GDDR6X memory pool on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses system-shared memory with bandwidth that is system dependent, meaning its performance in memory-heavy workloads will scale with the host platform rather than the GPU itself.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is a high-end discrete graphics card designed for demanding compute, rendering, and gaming workloads. Its 98th percentile ranking, 178050 average benchmark score, and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place it in the upper tier of the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, by contrast, is an integrated processor with 25 W TDP, no discrete memory, and no recorded benchmark results. It occupies the 50th percentile, which is the median position for all GPUs in the database, and its 588.8 GFLOPS FP32 figure is a fraction of what the NVIDIA card delivers.

The RTX 4090 D also holds a clear advantage in nearest-rival comparisons. It trails the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2%, the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 3.1%, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 3.6%, and the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.9%. These are small margins, and they show that the RTX 4090 D remains within a few percent of the fastest professional cards in the database. For anyone selecting a GPU based on the recorded data, the RTX 4090 D is the only option between these two that can handle high-resolution gaming, GPU compute, or professional rendering at scale.

The Intel part is not a competitor in this comparison. It is an integrated solution with system-shared memory, a 25 W power envelope, and no power connectors. It is suitable for portable devices with modest graphics needs, but the benchmark data offers no evidence that it can approach the performance level of the RTX 4090 D. The production status confirms this split: the Intel part is active and current, while the RTX 4090 D is end-of-life, meaning it is being phased out in favor of newer generations.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D wins in every measurable category in the database. It has a higher average benchmark score, a higher percentile ranking, more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, more ray tracing cores, more tensor cores, higher clock rates, dedicated GDDR6X memory, and a much higher TDP ceiling of 425 W. The card uses a triple-slot design, a 16-pin power connector, and a suggested power supply of 800 W, which indicates it is built for full-sized desktop systems with ample power delivery. Its display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections, so it can drive multiple high-resolution displays.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the 425 W TDP of the RTX 4090 D. It is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors, no slot width, and no separate cooler requirement, so it fits into systems where a discrete GPU is not an option. The Intel part uses system-shared memory, which removes the cost and complexity of dedicated VRAM. Its base clock is 300 MHz and its boost clock is 2300 MHz, which are lower than the NVIDIA card's 2280 MHz base and 2520 MHz boost, but the Intel part still supports modern APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For use cases involving lightweight productivity, video playback, or basic 3D acceleration in a thin-and-light laptop, the Intel part is the practical choice. For anything requiring sustained high-throughput compute, ray tracing, or gaming at high settings, the RTX 4090 D is the only viable option based on the recorded data. The RTX 4090 D also has a successor in the database, the GeForce 50 series, while the Intel part lists HD Graphics-M as its predecessor, which shows that it is part of a long line of integrated Intel graphics solutions.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D has an average benchmark score of 178050, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has an average score of 0 with no recorded benchmarks.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 D compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4090 D trails the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2%, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 3.1%, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 3.6%, and the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.9%.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The RTX 4090 D uses 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for both GPUs?

A: The RTX 4090 D delivers 73.54 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile delivers 588.8 GFLOPS.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The RTX 4090 D has a TDP of 425 W and requires a suggested 800 W power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W and uses no power connectors.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The RTX 4090 D is end-of-life, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is active.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and use different process nodes. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is built on a 3 nm process at Intel and uses the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Wildcat Lake chip. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD102 chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, while the NVIDIA card has 14592 shading units, 456 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The RTX 4090 D also includes 114 ray tracing cores and 456 tensor cores, whereas the Intel part has only 1 ray tracing core and no listed tensor cores.

The transistor counts differ enormously. The RTX 4090 D contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 125.3 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel part lists unknown transistor and die size figures in the database. The memory architecture is also fundamentally different: the RTX 4090 D uses 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, while the Intel part relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so they share the same API feature set. The FP16 compute behavior differs, however. The RTX 4090 D achieves 73.54 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, meaning FP16 and FP32 throughput are equal. The Intel part reaches 1,177.6 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is half its FP32 throughput when expressed in the same units. The pixel rate and texture rate also show the scale of the difference: the RTX 4090 D outputs 443.5 GPixel/s and 1,149.1 GTexel/s, while the Intel part outputs 9.200 GPixel/s and 18.40 GTexel/s.

Specification Differences

The clock speeds differ in both base and boost. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile runs at a 300 MHz base clock and a 2300 MHz boost clock. The RTX 4090 D runs at a 2280 MHz base clock and a 2520 MHz boost clock. Memory clocks are listed only for the NVIDIA card, which uses a 1313 MHz memory clock with 21 Gbps effective speed. The Intel part has no dedicated memory clock because it uses system-shared memory.

The form factors are entirely different. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor with no slot width, no power connectors, and no dimensions listed. The RTX 4090 D is a triple-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. It uses one 16-pin power connector and a suggested 800 W power supply. The bus interface for the Intel part is IGP, while the RTX 4090 D uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs also differ. The Intel part has display outputs that are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop or mobile platform. The RTX 4090 D has one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections. The release dates are far apart: the RTX 4090 D launched on December 27, 2023 with a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD, while the Intel part launched on April 15, 2026. The RTX 4090 D lists the GeForce 30 series as its predecessor and the GeForce 50 series as its successor. The Intel part lists HD Graphics-M as its predecessor and has no successor listed. The RTX 4090 D is end-of-life, while the Intel part is active. The NVIDIA card also has a 24 GB GDDR6X memory pool, while the Intel part uses system-shared memory of no fixed size.