Intel Arc G3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc G3

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2550 MHz
TDP 320 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
6,600
geekbench_opencl
N/A
219,065
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
260,075
passmark_directx_10
N/A
193
passmark_directx_11
N/A
301
passmark_directx_12
N/A
134
passmark_directx_9
N/A
381
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,270
passmark_g3d
N/A
34,245
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
19,822

Analysis: Intel Arc G3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Arc G3 and what is its target platform?

A: The Intel Arc G3 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on Intel's Panther Lake chip using the Xe3-LPG architecture. It is part of the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation and is manufactured on Intel's 3 nm process node.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between the two products?

A: The Intel Arc G3 uses system shared memory, with its memory type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the production statuses of these two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc G3 is currently marked as "Active" in production, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is listed as "End-of-life." The RTX 4080 SUPER was released on January 30, 2024, and the Arc G3 has a release date of May 31, 2026.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) difference?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 W and requires no power connectors, making it suitable for integration into a processor package. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has a TDP of 320 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a 700 W suggested power supply.

Q: What APIs do both GPUs support?

A: Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. There is no difference in the API feature set between the two.

Q: How do the transistor counts compare?

A: The transistor count for the Intel Arc G3 is listed as "unknown," while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 121.1 million transistors per square millimeter.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc G3 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER are fundamentally different classes of graphics hardware. The Arc G3 is an integrated GPU, meaning it is part of the Panther Lake processor package and shares system memory for all graphics operations. It is built on Intel's Xe3-LPG architecture, which is designed for low-power mobile and portable devices. The RTX 4080 SUPER, in contrast, is a discrete add-in board based on the AD103 chip using NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process.

The compute resources differ substantially. The Arc G3 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4080 SUPER has 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 80 ray tracing cores, and 320 tensor cores. The Arc G3's ray tracing implementation is present but limited to 10 cores, while the RTX 4080 SUPER has eight times that count. Tensor cores, which are used for AI-accelerated workloads, are not specified for the Arc G3, while the RTX 4080 SUPER includes 320 of them.

Clock speeds reveal the different design philosophies. The Arc G3 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The RTX 4080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz. The Arc G3's wide clock range reflects its power-adaptive nature as an integrated part, while the RTX 4080 SUPER operates at consistently high clocks under its 320 W power envelope.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The Arc G3 relies on system memory with bandwidth that is dependent on the host system, so its performance scales with the platform it is integrated into. The RTX 4080 SUPER has dedicated 16 GB of GDDR6X memory running at an effective speed of 23 Gbps, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth over a 256-bit interface. This dedicated memory bandwidth is a decisive advantage for high-resolution texture streaming and compute-heavy workloads.

The physical formats are also distinct. The Arc G3 is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and display outputs that are dependent on the portable device it is embedded in. The RTX 4080 SUPER is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, with outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 4080 SUPER connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc G3 uses the integrated graphics path.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows a clear separation of use cases. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the overwhelmingly dominant performer in raw graphics throughput. Its recorded benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 260075, and a Passmark G3D score of 34245. The Arc G3 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning its performance cannot be quantified against the RTX 4080 SUPER in any direct comparison.

The RTX 4080 SUPER's strength is in desktop and high-end laptop gaming, content creation, and compute workloads that demand high fill rates and large memory pools. Its 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 816.0 GTexel/s texture rate make it suited for 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. Its 285.6 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high refresh rates at high resolutions.

The Intel Arc G3 wins in a different category: power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX 4080 SUPER's 320 W TDP. It requires no power connectors and no dedicated power supply. This makes it applicable to portable devices where battery life and thermal constraints are paramount. The Arc G3's performance is system-dependent, so in a thin-and-light laptop with fast LPDDR memory, it can handle light gaming and media tasks, but its capabilities are bounded by the shared memory bandwidth.

The Arc G3 also has the advantage of production status: it is currently active, while the RTX 4080 SUPER has been discontinued. For new system designs targeting ultra-mobile form factors, the Arc G3 is an available option, whereas the RTX 4080 SUPER is limited to existing stock or used markets.

Specification Differences

The two products differ on nearly every measurable specification. The process node is 3 nm for the Arc G3 versus 5 nm for the RTX 4080 SUPER. The foundry is Intel for the Arc G3 and TSMC for the RTX 4080 SUPER. Transistor counts are unknown for the Arc G3 versus 45,900 million for the RTX 4080 SUPER, and die size is unknown versus 379 mm².

Clock speeds: the Arc G3 runs at 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, while the RTX 4080 SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2550 MHz boost. Memory is system shared for the Arc G3, while the RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X at 23 Gbps effective, on a 256-bit bus, yielding 736.3 GB/s.

Compute units: the Arc G3 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The RTX 4080 SUPER has 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 80 RT cores, and 320 tensor cores. The Arc G3 has no listed tensor cores.

Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc G3 versus 285.6 GPixel/s for the RTX 4080 SUPER. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s versus 816.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS versus 52.22 TFLOPS. FP16 is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Arc G3 versus 52.22 TFLOPS (1:1) for the RTX 4080 SUPER.

Power and physical specs: the Arc G3 is 25 W, IGP slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and integrated bus interface. The RTX 4080 SUPER is 320 W, triple-slot, 1x 16-pin connector, 700 W suggested PSU, and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc G3 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER. This is because the Arc G3 has an empty benchmarks array and no nearest rivals listed, while the RTX 4080 SUPER has ten recorded benchmark entries. Direct comparison of their measured performance is therefore not possible from the recorded data.

The RTX 4080 SUPER's standalone scores provide a reference point for its absolute capability. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 indicates strong DX12 gaming performance. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 260075 is its highest recorded compute result, suggesting Vulkan-based workloads run particularly well. The Passmark G3D score of 34245 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 19822 show balanced rasterization and compute performance. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 301 and DirectX 10 score of 193 are legacy API results, while the DirectX 12 score of 134 and DirectX 9 score of 381 round out the profile.

The RTX 4080 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database are all within a narrow margin. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average score of 54247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER's average of 54209. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% above, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 2.7% above. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.8% above the RTX 4080 SUPER. This clustering indicates that the RTX 4080 SUPER sits at a competitive position within its performance class, slightly behind four direct alternatives in average score.

The percentile rank of the RTX 4080 SUPER is 86 among all GPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms 86% of recorded graphics processors. The Arc G3 has a percentile rank of 50, placing it at the median of the database. This percentile gap, combined with the absence of any measured benchmarks for the Arc G3, suggests that the RTX 4080 SUPER occupies a much higher performance tier.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a straightforward selection based on use case. For any application that demands high frame rates, high resolutions, or heavy compute throughput, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the only viable choice between the two. Its 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 80 ray tracing cores place it in a performance class that the Arc G3 cannot approach based on the available specifications. The RTX 4080 SUPER's 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms its position as a high-end part, and its benchmark scores demonstrate strong DX12, Vulkan, and compute capabilities.

The Intel Arc G3 is the choice for systems where power draw and physical footprint are the limiting factors. Its 25 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and IGP form factor make it suitable for portable devices where a discrete card cannot be installed. Its performance is system dependent, so the actual experience will vary with the host memory and processor. The Arc G3's median percentile rank of 50 indicates it is an average performer in the database, adequate for light workloads but not competitive with the RTX 4080 SUPER in any measured category.

The RTX 4080 SUPER is end-of-life with a launch MSRP of 999 USD, while the Arc G3 is active and has no launch MSRP recorded. Buyers seeking a new high-performance desktop GPU must look elsewhere, as the RTX 4080 SUPER is no longer in production. Buyers designing new ultra-portable devices can source the Arc G3 as an integrated solution.

The absence of head-to-head benchmark data means the performance gap cannot be quantified directly, but the specification differences are decisive. The RTX 4080 SUPER has eight times the shading units, eight times the RT cores, and more than eight times the FP32 throughput of the Arc G3. Its memory bandwidth is orders of magnitude higher than any system shared configuration. For gaming, rendering, or compute, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the superior product. For battery-powered, fanless, or space-constrained designs, the Arc G3 is the only applicable option. The choice is not about which is faster, but about which fits the system.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
G3
RTX 4080 SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,280
10,240 +700.0%
Shaders
1,280
10,240 +700.0%
TMUs
40
320 +700.0%
ROPs
20
112 +460.0%
SM Count
80
Execution Units
10
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2550 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1438 MHz 23 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
736.3 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
285.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
816.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.144 TFLOPS
52.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
768.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
816.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
52.22 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
10
80 +700.0%
Tensor Cores
320
XMX Cores
80
Power
TDP
25 W
320 W
TDP (W)
25
320 +1180.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Panther Lake
AD103
Generation
Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake)
GeForce 40
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
45,900 million
Die Size
unknown
379 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Triple-slot
Length
310 mm 12.2 inches
Height
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
999 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50
View Arc G3 Details View GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Details