Intel Arc B770 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 Comparison

Intel Arc B770 and Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 occupy very different positions in Intel’s GPU lineup. The Arc B770 is a consumer-oriented Battlemage part built for gaming and general graphics workloads, while the Data Center GPU Max 1100 is a compute-focused accelerator with massive memory capacity and bandwidth. The recorded data shows a clear split between the two, with the Max 1100 leading in raw throughput metrics and the Arc B770 offering modern API support and display outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs. However, the recorded specifications allow for a meaningful comparison of theoretical performance ceilings. In FP32 compute, the Data Center GPU Max 1100 delivers 22.22 TFLOPS, which is roughly 13% higher than the Arc B770’s 19.66 TFLOPS. This margin reflects the Max 1100’s larger shader array of 7168 shading units compared to 4096 on the Arc B770, though the Arc B770 compensates with a substantially higher boost clock of 2400 MHz versus 1550 MHz.

The FP16 comparison flips decisively in favor of the Arc B770. The Arc B770 achieves 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 through a 2:1 ratio, meaning it processes half-precision data at twice the rate of FP32. The Data Center GPU Max 1100 operates at a 1:1 FP16 ratio, delivering 22.22 TFLOPS, which is identical to its FP32 output. This gives the Arc B770 a 77% advantage in FP16 throughput, a notable result for AI inference workloads that rely heavily on half-precision arithmetic.

Texture processing favors the Data Center GPU Max 1100. Its 448 texture mapping units produce 694.4 GTexel/s, while the Arc B770’s 256 TMUs generate 614.4 GTexel/s. The 13% texture rate advantage for the Max 1100 aligns closely with its FP32 lead, suggesting consistent scaling across these compute-bound operations. Pixel fill rate is a different story entirely. The Arc B770 achieves 307.2 GPixel/s, while the Data Center GPU Max 1100 is recorded at 0 MPixel/s because it lacks ROPs entirely. This confirms the Max 1100 is not designed for rasterized graphics output, making it unsuitable for traditional display workloads.

Memory bandwidth shows the most dramatic separation. The Data Center GPU Max 1100’s HBM2e memory subsystem delivers 1.23 TB/s across an 8192-bit bus, while the Arc B770’s GDDR6 memory provides 512.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus. The Max 1100’s bandwidth advantage is 140%, which is critical for data-intensive compute tasks that stream large datasets through the GPU. The Arc B770’s memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective transfer, while the Max 1100 operates at 600 MHz with 1200 Mbps effective, relying on its extremely wide bus rather than high clock speeds.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use fundamentally different architectures. The Arc B770 is built on Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage generation under the Arc 7 series. It uses the BMG-G31 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses Generation 12.5 architecture with the Ponte Vecchio chip, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. The die sizes reflect this divergence: the Arc B770 measures 368 mm², while the Data Center GPU Max 1100 spans 1280 mm², nearly 3.5 times larger. The Max 1100 integrates 100,000 million transistors at a density of 78.1M per mm², while the Arc B770’s transistor count is listed as unknown.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The Arc B770 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, while the Data Center GPU Max 1100 carries 48 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus. This makes the Max 1100 suitable for large models and datasets that would exceed the Arc B770’s capacity. The interface also differs: the Arc B770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, doubling the potential host transfer bandwidth.

API support separates the two in ways that matter for software compatibility. The Arc B770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Data Center GPU Max 1100 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan support is not recorded. The Arc B770 also includes display outputs with 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Data Center GPU Max 1100 has no display outputs at all, reinforcing its compute-only purpose.

Power and physical requirements also differ. The Arc B770 draws 225 W and requires a 550 W power supply, with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connectors. The Data Center GPU Max 1100 draws 300 W and requires a 700 W power supply, using a single 12-pin connector. Both cards are dual-slot designs, but the Max 1100 is 267 mm long, while the Arc B770’s dimensions are not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Data Center GPU Max 1100 delivers 22.22 TFLOPS FP32, which is 13% higher than the Arc B770’s 19.66 TFLOPS.

Q: Can the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 output video to a display?

A: No. The database lists its display outputs as "No outputs" and its pixel rate as 0 MPixel/s, indicating it cannot perform rasterized display output. The Arc B770 includes 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Data Center GPU Max 1100 has 48 GB of HBM2e with 1.23 TB/s bandwidth. The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Why is the Arc B770 better for FP16 workloads?

A: The Arc B770 achieves 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 via a 2:1 ratio, while the Data Center GPU Max 1100 achieves 22.22 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. This gives the Arc B770 a 77% advantage in half-precision throughput.

Q: What are the process node differences?

A: The Arc B770 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses Intel’s 10 nm process.

Q: Which GPU supports newer graphics APIs?

A: The Arc B770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4. The Data Center GPU Max 1100 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and has no recorded Vulkan support.

The Verdict

The data describes two GPUs with almost no overlap in intended use. The Data Center GPU Max 1100 wins on FP32 compute, texture rate, memory capacity, memory bandwidth, and transistor scale. It is the choice for workloads that need large memory footprints and sustained bandwidth, such as data center compute tasks. Its 48 GB HBM2e pool and 1.23 TB/s bandwidth dramatically exceed the Arc B770’s 16 GB and 512.0 GB/s, which matters when datasets approach or exceed the smaller card’s capacity.

The Arc B770 wins on FP16 throughput, API support, display outputs, pixel rate, and power efficiency. Its 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 at a 225 W TDP contrasts with the Max 1100’s 22.22 TFLOPS FP16 at 300 W. The Arc B770’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 make it compatible with modern gaming and graphics applications, while the Max 1100’s DirectX 12 (12_1) and absent Vulkan limit its role to compute environments. The Arc B770 also requires a 550 W power supply versus 700 W for the Max 1100, reducing system power demands.

Neither GPU is a substitute for the other. A user needing display output, modern graphics APIs, or half-precision compute would select the Arc B770. A user prioritizing memory capacity, bandwidth, or raw FP32 throughput would select the Data Center GPU Max 1100. The Max 1100’s 1280 mm² die, 100,000 million transistors, and 10 nm process indicate a design optimized for scale over efficiency, while the Arc B770’s 368 mm² die on 5 nm shows a focus on density and power management.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc B770 | Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | BMG-G31 | Ponte Vecchio |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | Generation 12.5 |

| Generation | Battlemage (Arc 7) | Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | unknown | 100,000 million |

| Die Size | 368 mm² | 1280 mm² |

| Transistor Density | not recorded | 78.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2100 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 1550 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 600 MHz, 1200 Mbps effective |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 48 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2e |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 8192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 1.23 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 4096 | 7168 |

| TMUs | 256 | 448 |

| ROPs | 128 | 0 |

| RT Cores | 32 | 56 |

| Pixel Rate | 307.2 GPixel/s | 0 MPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 614.4 GTexel/s | 694.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS | 22.22 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) | 22.22 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 225 W | 300 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 700 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | not recorded |

| Production Status | not recorded | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2023-01-09 |

| Predecessor | Alchemist | not recorded |

| Successor | not recorded | H3C Graphics |

Where Each One Wins

The Arc B770 wins in scenarios involving half-precision compute. Its 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 output is 77% higher than the Max 1100’s, which benefits AI inference and other workloads using FP16 arithmetic. It also wins in any application requiring display output, as the Max 1100 has none. The Arc B770’s DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support make it the only option among the two for modern graphics software. Its lower TDP of 225 W and 550 W suggested PSU reduce infrastructure demands.

The Data Center GPU Max 1100 wins in memory-bound compute tasks. Its 48 GB capacity and 1.23 TB/s bandwidth allow it to process datasets that would exceed the Arc B770’s 16 GB pool. Its FP32 throughput of 22.22 TFLOPS is 13% higher, and its texture rate of 694.4 GTexel/s is 13% faster. The Max 1100 also uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which provides a faster host interface than the Arc B770’s PCIe 4.0 x16. The Max 1100 has 56 RT cores compared to 32 on the Arc B770, though neither card’s ray tracing workload results are recorded in the database. The Max 1100’s production status is listed as Active, while the Arc B770’s is not recorded.