Intel Arc B370 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains only one benchmark result for the Intel Arc B370: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. This places the part at the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, so no direct head-to-head comparison can be drawn from measured performance. The Arc B370's score sits within a narrow band of comparable results, trailing the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 by 0.2% (1186), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 by 0.5% (1190), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M by 0.7% (1192). It leads the AMD FirePro M2000 by 1.4% (1168). These margins are small enough that run-to-run variation could reorder the group, but the data indicates the Arc B370 occupies a very low performance tier in this specific DX12 workload.

The LX PRO has no measured scores, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Its percentile ranking of 50 is a placeholder based on its specification position rather than actual test results. Without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for the LX PRO over the Arc B370. The Arc B370 at least has a concrete score, while the LX PRO remains unverified in real workloads. Any claims about relative performance would require measured results, which are absent from the database.

The Arc B370's nearest rivals all sit within roughly 1.5% of its score. The spread from the lowest (FirePro M2000 at 1168) to the highest (Radeon HD 7650M at 1192) is just 24 points, or about 2%. This clustering suggests the Arc B370 performs at a level comparable to decade-old discrete mobile and entry desktop parts in this benchmark. The 5th percentile ranking confirms that the overwhelming majority of GPUs in the database score higher. The LX PRO, lacking any recorded benchmark, cannot be positioned within this distribution.

FAQ

Q: What is the only benchmark score available for the Intel Arc B370?

A: The Arc B370 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184, which places it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any recorded benchmark results?

A: No. The LX PRO has no benchmark entries in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0 with a 50th percentile placeholder.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: It trails the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 by 0.2%, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M by 0.7%, while leading the AMD FirePro M2000 by 1.4%.

Q: What are the memory specifications of the LX PRO?

A: The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference between the two cards?

A: The Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, is a dual-slot card, requires a 550 W suggested power supply, and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs.

The Verdict

The data clearly distinguishes these two products by form factor and target use case. The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and system shared memory. It is designed for portable devices, as indicated by its display output description of "Portable Device Dependent" and its IGP bus interface. Its single recorded benchmark score of 1184 places it at the 5th percentile, meaning it sits far below most discrete GPUs in the database. Users who need a compact, low-power integrated solution would be the audience for this part.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, a 550 W suggested power supply, a 16-pin connector, and 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. It has substantially higher specifications: 6144 shading units versus 1280, 192 TMUs versus 40, 96 ROPs versus 20, and FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS. It also has a larger memory bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s compared to the Arc B370's system dependent bandwidth. However, it has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot confirm how these specifications translate into real performance.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the Arc B370 is a low-power integrated part with measured but modest performance, while the LX PRO is a high-specification discrete card whose performance remains unverified. A user requiring a dedicated GPU with substantial memory capacity and high compute throughput would look to the LX PRO based on its specifications, but the lack of benchmark data leaves its real-world standing unproven. A user constrained to integrated graphics in a portable device would use the Arc B370, whose performance level is documented but low.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every recorded specification. The Arc B370 uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm node from TSMC. Clock speeds differ significantly: the Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the LX PRO has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory configurations are entirely different, with the Arc B370 using system shared memory of system dependent bandwidth, and the LX PRO using 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) memory clock.

Compute resources differ by roughly 4 to 5 times. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Pixel rate and texture rate reflect this gap: the LX PRO delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, while the Arc B370 delivers 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc B370. FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS.

Form factor and power requirements are also distinct. The Arc B370 is an IGP with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The Arc B370 has no bus interface beyond IGP. Display outputs for the LX PRO are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Arc B370's outputs are portable device dependent. The LX PRO has physical dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, while the Arc B370 has no recorded dimensions.

API support is nearly identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc B370 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The Arc B370 has 10 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO has no recorded RT core count. Neither part has recorded tensor core counts.

Architecture Differences

The Arc B370 is built on Intel's Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. It uses a 3 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The LX PRO uses a 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. These are fundamentally different design approaches: the Arc B370 is an integrated solution from a major CPU and GPU manufacturer, while the LX PRO is a discrete card from a manufacturer listed as "Unknown" in the database.

The Arc B370's Xe3-LPG architecture targets low-power integrated graphics, evidenced by its 25 W TDP, 300 MHz base clock, and system shared memory. Its 1280 shading units and 10 ray tracing cores support modern API features like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, but at a scale consistent with an IGP. The LX PRO's TrueGPU architecture is configured for high throughput: 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs produce 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 384.0 GTexel/s of texture rate. Its 24 GB GDDR6 memory pool and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate a design aimed at large datasets and high-resolution workloads.

Node differences matter for efficiency. The Arc B370's 3 nm Intel process is more advanced than the LX PRO's 6 nm TSMC process, which helps explain how the Arc B370 achieves its low 25 W TDP despite having a modern architecture. The LX PRO's 225 W TDP reflects a much larger silicon footprint and dedicated memory subsystem. The Arc B370 has no dedicated memory of its own, relying entirely on system shared memory, while the LX PRO carries its own 24 GB GDDR6 array.

The generation names also differ: Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) versus 7G100. The Arc B370 was released on 2026-01-26, and the LX PRO on 2026-03-16, roughly two months later. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither has a recorded predecessor or successor. The LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3 support trails the Arc B370's Vulkan 1.4 by one minor version, which could matter for applications relying on the newest Vulkan extensions. Otherwise, the API feature sets align closely, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6.

The LX PRO's pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is exactly four times the Arc B370's 48.00 GPixel/s, matching the 4x difference in ROP count (96 versus 20, though 96/20 is 4.8x, the pixel rates indicate a 4x ratio). Texture rate also scales roughly 4x (384.0 versus 96.00 GTexel/s), consistent with the TMU count ratio of 192 versus 40. FP32 and FP16 throughput both scale at approximately 4x as well. These consistent ratios indicate the LX PRO's architecture scales the same compute and memory pipeline across a much wider configuration.