Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Comparison

Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060: A Database Benchmark Analysis

The recorded data for the Intel Arc B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 presents a stark contrast in performance tiers, architectural design, and intended use cases. The Intel Arc B370 functions as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built for low-power mobile platforms, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is a discrete, dual-slot add-in board designed for full-size desktop systems. The benchmark results confirm a massive performance gulf, but the analysis of where each part wins, the underlying silicon differences, and the system-level implications reveals a more nuanced picture than the raw scores alone suggest.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The results are lopsided. The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 points, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 3628 points in the same test. The delta percentage for the Intel part is recorded at -67.4%, indicating that its score is 67.4% lower than the RTX 5060's result. In absolute terms, the RTX 5060 delivers a score that is slightly more than three times higher than the Arc B370. This single data point establishes the RTX 5060 as the clear winner in raw DX12 rasterization performance, a lead that is not merely incremental but represents a different performance class.

The RTX 5060's additional benchmark results, which are not shared by the Arc B370, provide context for its overall capability. Its Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 112787, and its Vulkan score is 113321, showing strong compute and graphics API performance beyond the single DX12 test. The PassMark suite further reveals its versatility: a G3D score of 20891, a GPU compute score of 10899, and legacy DirectX scores of 225 for DX9, 200 for DX11, 127 for DX10, and 77 for DX12. The G2D score of 1154 indicates robust 2D acceleration. For the Arc B370, the database contains only the single Steel Nomad result and an average benchmark score of 1184, which matches its sole recorded test. The RTX 5060's average benchmark score of 26331 is heavily influenced by its multiple high compute scores, but even in the shared gaming test, the outcome is decisive.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 wins every category where a direct comparison exists. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 dwarfs the Intel Arc B370's 1184. The RTX 5060 also wins on sheer feature breadth, with recorded scores across OpenCL, Vulkan, multiple PassMark DirectX versions, and 2D tests. The Intel Arc B370 has no recorded wins in the database; the winsA field is 0, while winsB is 1. This indicates that in the head-to-head matchup, the RTX 5060 takes the sole benchmark victory.

However, the Intel Arc B370 wins in a different sense: system integration. As an IGP with a 25 W TDP and no power connectors, it requires no additional power cabling and fits into a platform as part of the processor itself. Its slot width is listed as "IGP", meaning it occupies no expansion slot. The RTX 5060, by contrast, is a dual-slot card measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requires a 1x 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 300 W. The Arc B370's memory is system-shared, with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent", which means it relies on the host system's RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. The RTX 5060 uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In scenarios where minimal power draw, no discrete GPU slot, and shared memory are acceptable, the Arc B370 is the only viable option of the two. In any scenario demanding high frame rates or compute throughput, the RTX 5060 is the sole winner.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is substantial. The Intel Arc B370 is built on a 3 nm process node at Intel's foundry, using the Xe3-LPG architecture and the Panther Lake chip. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, the GB206 chip, and is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5060 has 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The Arc B370's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no direct density comparison is possible.

The compute resources differ by a factor of three in several key areas. The RTX 5060 has 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 48 raster operation units (ROPs). The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. Ray tracing cores follow suit: the RTX 5060 has 30 RT cores, while the Arc B370 has 10. The RTX 5060 also includes 120 tensor cores; the Arc B370's tensor core count is listed as null. The clock speeds show a different design philosophy. The Arc B370 has a very low base clock of 300 MHz but boosts to 2400 MHz, a wide dynamic range typical of power-constrained integrated parts. The RTX 5060 has a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost of 2497 MHz, a much narrower range. The resulting pixel rate for the RTX 5060 is 119.9 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc B370. Texture rate is 299.6 GTexel/s for NVIDIA versus 96.00 GTexel/s for Intel. The FP32 throughput is 19.18 TFLOPS for the RTX 5060, while the Arc B370 manages 6.144 TFLOPS. Notably, the RTX 5060 achieves FP16 at the same 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), whereas the Arc B370 reaches 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists despite the hardware differences.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 3628, which is 67.4% higher than the Intel Arc B370's score of 1184.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 uses 8 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc B370 uses system-shared memory, with its type, bus width, and bandwidth all described as system-dependent.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP, is an IGP, and requires no power connectors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has a 145 W TDP, is a dual-slot card, requires a 1x 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same modern APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, according to the recorded API data.

Q: What are the process nodes and foundries for each chip?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has 3840 shading units, compared to 1280 on the Intel Arc B370.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear, decisive outcome for performance-sensitive applications. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628, which is 67.4% higher than the Intel Arc B370's 1184. Its 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 30 RT cores place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile, with its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and system-dependent memory. For anyone building a desktop system with a dedicated power budget, a PCIe 5.0 x8 slot, and a need for high DX12 performance, the RTX 5060 is the only option that aligns with the data.

The Intel Arc B370, however, serves a different purpose. Its 25 W TDP, IGP form factor, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for compact, low-power mobile platforms where a discrete GPU cannot fit. Its nearest rivals in the database, such as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 with a score of 1186 and a delta of -0.2%, and the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190 with a delta of -0.5%, are similarly aged or low-power parts, confirming its positioning as an entry-level integrated solution. The RTX 5060's nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT with a score of 26011 and a delta of 1.2%, show it competes with much higher-end discrete hardware. The choice between these two is therefore not a question of which is better in absolute terms, but which fits the system constraints: a power-sipping IGP for portable devices versus a high-performance discrete card for desktop towers.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc B370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Chip | Panther Lake | GB206 |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 21,900 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 181 mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2280 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2497 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 448.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1280 | 3840 |

| TMUs | 40 | 120 |

| ROPs | 20 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 10 | 30 |

| Tensor Cores | null | 120 |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 119.9 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 299.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 6.144 TFLOPS | 19.18 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 145 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 300 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | null | 241 mm x 111 mm x 40 mm |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2025-05-18 |

| Launch MSRP | null | 299 USD |

| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 1184 | 3628 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 5 | 72 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 1184 | 26331 |