Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a single direct comparison between the Intel Arc B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the NVIDIA part scores 5569 points, while the Intel part scores 1184 points. This yields a delta of -78.7% for the Intel Arc B370, indicating that the NVIDIA GPU delivers a score roughly 4.7 times higher in this specific workload. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the decisive winner in the only head-to-head benchmark available.

The Intel Arc B370's average benchmark score is 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database are older or lower-tier parts: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (average score 1186, delta of -0.2%), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (average score 1190, delta of -0.5%), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (average score 1192, delta of -0.7%), and the AMD FirePro M2000 (average score 1168, delta of 1.4%). The delta values here are small, meaning the Arc B370 sits in a narrow performance band among these entries. The closest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, is effectively tied with the Arc B370 in average score, differing by only 2 points. The AMD FirePro M2000 is the only one of the four that trails the Arc B370, and it does so by a margin of 1.4%.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 31087, placing it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all high-end workstation or enthusiast parts. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 has an average score of 31206 and a delta of -0.4% relative to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q scores 31220 with a delta of -0.4%. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31532 with a delta of -1.4%. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX scores 31676 with a delta of -1.9%. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER trails each of these four rivals slightly, with the largest gap being 1.9% behind the TITAN RTX. The percentile gap between the two compared parts is substantial: 5th percentile versus 76th percentile, a span that reflects the gulf in raw performance in the database.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also has a wider set of recorded benchmarks beyond the single steel nomad test. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 199267, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 53683. In Passmark tests, it records 31811 in G3D, 18372 in GPU compute, 1225 in G2D, 360 in DirectX 9, 278 in DirectX 11, 181 in DirectX 10, and 119 in DirectX 12. These additional scores give a fuller picture of its behavior across different API generations and compute workloads. The Arc B370 has no comparable multi-test record in the database; its only benchmark is the Steel Nomad result. The absence of additional Arc B370 scores means the comparison rests on the single shared test, and the margin there is unambiguous: the NVIDIA part holds a 78.7% advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and use different underlying designs. The Intel Arc B370 is built on the Panther Lake chip using the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. Its process node is 3 nm, and the foundry is Intel. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture, part of the GeForce 40 generation. Its process node is 5 nm, and the foundry is TSMC. The Intel part is fabricated on a smaller node, but the NVIDIA part has a substantially larger implementation. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The Arc B370's transistor count, die size, and density are not recorded in the database.

The execution resources differ sharply. The Intel Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, 96 raster output units, 66 ray tracing cores, and 264 tensor cores. The Arc B370 has no tensor core count listed. The NVIDIA part has roughly 6.6 times the shading units, 6.6 times the TMUs, and 4.8 times the ROPs compared to the Intel part. Its ray tracing core count is also higher by a factor of 6.6.

Clock behavior differs as well. The Arc B370 runs at a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs at a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. The NVIDIA part's base clock is far higher, while the boost clocks are closer, though the NVIDIA part still holds a 210 MHz advantage at boost. The Intel part has no dedicated memory of its own; its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," and its memory bandwidth is "System Dependent." The NVIDIA part uses 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. The memory clock for the NVIDIA part is 1313 MHz, described as 21 Gbps effective.

The pixel and texture rates reflect the resource gap. The Arc B370 delivers 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA part is about 5.2 times faster in pixel throughput and about 7.2 times faster in texture throughput. Floating point performance follows a similar pattern. The Arc B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 and 44.10 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA part offers roughly 7.2 times the FP32 throughput and, because of the 1:1 FP16 ratio, much higher FP16 throughput relative to its FP32 figure.

Power and physical design differ significantly. The Intel Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. Its slot width is listed as "IGP," its bus interface is "IGP," and its display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent." The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W, a triple-slot cooler, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 600 W. Its bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and its display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Its dimensions are 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status differs: the Intel Arc B370 is listed as active, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is listed as end-of-life. The NVIDIA part's predecessor is GeForce 30 and its successor is GeForce 50. The Intel part has no predecessor or successor listed. The release dates differ by roughly two years: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER was released on 2024-01-23, and the Arc B370 on 2026-01-26. The NVIDIA part has a launch MSRP of 799 USD, while the Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher score in the shared 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 5569, while the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184. The NVIDIA part leads by 78.7% in this test.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Arc B370 has an average score of 1184 and sits in the 5th percentile. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, a delta of -0.2%. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (-0.5%), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (-0.7%), and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168 (+1.4%). The Arc B370 is effectively at parity with these parts, with all deltas within 1.4%.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP and physical form factor differences?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W and is an IGP with no power connectors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W, uses a triple-slot cooler, requires one 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 600 W. The NVIDIA card measures 310 mm by 140 mm by 61 mm.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8448 shading units and 66 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc B370 has 1280 shading units and 10 ray tracing cores.

Q: Are the two GPUs in the same production status?

A: No. The Intel Arc B370 is listed as active, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is listed as end-of-life.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every recorded specification. The process node differs: the Intel Arc B370 uses a 3 nm node from Intel, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm node from TSMC. The transistor count, die size, and transistor density are only recorded for the NVIDIA part: 45,900 million transistors, 379 mm², and 121.1M per mm². The base clock differs significantly: 300 MHz for the Intel part versus 2340 MHz for the NVIDIA part. The boost clocks are 2400 MHz and 2610 MHz, respectively.

Memory is a major differentiator. The Arc B370 has system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The compute resources differ: 1280 versus 8448 shading units, 40 versus 264 TMUs, 20 versus 96 ROPs, and 10 versus 66 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part also has 264 tensor cores; the Intel part has no tensor core count listed. Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s versus 250.6 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s versus 689.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 6.144 TFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS. FP16 is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1).

TDP differs from 25 W to 285 W. Slot width is IGP versus triple-slot. Power connectors are none versus one 16-pin. The suggested PSU is not listed for the Intel part and is 600 W for the NVIDIA part. The bus interface is IGP versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent" versus 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The NVIDIA part has recorded dimensions; the Intel part has none. Production status is active versus end-of-life. Release dates are 2026-01-26 versus 2024-01-23. The NVIDIA part has a launch MSRP of 799 USD; the Intel part has none. The NVIDIA part has a predecessor (GeForce 30) and a successor (GeForce 50); the Intel part has neither. The API support is identical: both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569, which is 78.7% higher than the Intel Arc B370's score of 1184. The NVIDIA part sits in the 76th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the Intel part sits in the 5th percentile. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also has a far larger set of recorded benchmark results, including Geekbench OpenCL, Geekbench Vulkan, and multiple Passmark tests, whereas the Arc B370 has only the single Steel Nomad result. Users who require high frame rates or compute throughput in the recorded workloads should select the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The Intel Arc B370, with its 25 W TDP and IGP form factor, is suited to systems where the GPU is integrated into the platform and power draw is minimal. Its nearest rivals in the database are older discrete parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and it trades within 1.4% of all four nearest rivals. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, meanwhile, trades within 1.9% of the NVIDIA TITAN RTX and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. The choice between the two is not a close call based on the recorded data: the NVIDIA part wins the only shared benchmark by a wide margin, has vastly more compute resources, and carries a 285 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU, while the Intel part is an integrated, 25 W solution with system-shared memory and no dedicated VRAM.