Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a stark contrast between these two parts, though direct head-to-head comparison is limited by the available test results. The Intel Arc B370 has a single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184, placing it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database. This is a very low position, indicating entry-level integrated graphics performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no recorded benchmark score in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking, which is the median position for all GPUs. This percentile difference alone, 5 versus 50, suggests the NVIDIA part operates in a completely different performance class.

The Intel Arc B370's nearest rivals in the database are all older discrete and mobile parts. It sits 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M. The only GPU it leads is the AMD FirePro M2000, by a margin of 1.4%. These deltas, all within 1.5% of each other, confirm that the Arc B370 delivers performance comparable to a decade-old entry-level graphics solution. The data shows a tightly clustered group of scores between 1168 and 1192, with the Arc B370's 1184 squarely in the middle.

Without a direct score for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104, the gap must be inferred from other recorded specifications. The NVIDIA part's FP32 compute of 22.06 TFLOPS is 3.6 times higher than the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 344.8 GTexel/s is 3.6 times the Arc B370's 96.00 GTexel/s. The pixel rate difference is even larger, with the RTX 4060 Ti delivering 121.7 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc B370, a 2.5 times advantage. The score distributions in the database, with the Arc B370 at the 5th percentile and the RTX 4060 Ti at the 50th, reinforce that the NVIDIA part is positioned for mainstream gaming while the Intel part targets basic mobile workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process node, fabricated by Intel itself. The chip is named Panther Lake and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation, clearly indicating a mobile integrated graphics processor. It has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 34 RT cores, and 136 tensor cores. The NVIDIA chip has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The Arc B370 runs at a 300 MHz base clock and boosts to 2400 MHz. The RTX 4060 Ti has a 2310 MHz base clock and a 2535 MHz boost clock. The Intel part's memory is system shared, with no dedicated VRAM, no fixed bus width, and bandwidth described as system dependent. The NVIDIA part uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth at an effective 18 Gbps data rate. This represents a fundamental architectural split: one is a unified memory architecture integrated into a processor, the other is a discrete graphics card with its own dedicated memory subsystem.

The feature sets show some overlap. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4060 Ti adds tensor cores, which the Arc B370 does not list. The Intel part's FP16 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA part achieves 22.06 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. This indicates the Ada Lovelace architecture handles FP16 at full rate without the shader-splitting penalty. The power envelope is dramatically different, with the Arc B370 rated at 25 W and the RTX 4060 Ti at 160 W, a 6.4 times difference. The Intel part uses no power connector as an integrated component, while the NVIDIA card requires a single 16-pin connector and a 450 W suggested power supply.

The Verdict

The data presents two products aimed at entirely different markets. The Intel Arc B370, with its 25 W TDP, integrated form factor, and system shared memory, is clearly designed for thin and light portable devices. Its performance, sitting at the 5th percentile and matching decade-old discrete GPUs, indicates it handles basic graphics acceleration, video playback, and light productivity tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 in the context of rivals within 1.5% suggests this is the expected performance level for this class of integrated graphics.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104, at 160 W and with a dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory subsystem, targets desktop gaming. Its 50th percentile ranking, FP32 throughput of 22.06 TFLOPS, and texture rate of 344.8 GTexel/s place it in the mid-range of the database's GPU population. The presence of 136 tensor cores and 34 RT cores indicates hardware acceleration for AI workloads and ray tracing, features absent or minimal in the Intel part. The RTX 4060 Ti's production status is end-of-life, while the Arc B370 is active, suggesting the Intel part is a current product while the NVIDIA card has been superseded.

For portable devices needing basic graphics without dedicated VRAM, the data supports the Arc B370. For desktop systems requiring substantial gaming performance with dedicated memory, the RTX 4060 Ti is the clear choice based on every recorded metric. The 3.6 times advantage in shader throughput and texture rate, combined with the 2.5 times pixel rate advantage, leaves no ambiguity in the performance hierarchy.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show differences in nearly every category. The process node differs: 3 nm for Intel versus 5 nm for NVIDIA. The foundry also differs, with Intel fabricating its own chip while TSMC produces the NVIDIA part. The RTX 4060 Ti has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, while the Arc B370's transistor count and die size are unknown. The base clock is 300 MHz for Intel versus 2310 MHz for NVIDIA. The boost clock is 2400 MHz versus 2535 MHz.

Memory configuration is completely different. The Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The shading unit count is 1280 versus 4352. Texture mapping units number 40 versus 136. Raster output units are 20 versus 48. Ray tracing cores are 10 versus 34. Tensor cores are not listed for Intel but number 136 for NVIDIA.

Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s versus 121.7 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s versus 344.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS versus 22.06 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS at 2:1 versus 22.06 TFLOPS at 1:1. The TDP is 25 W versus 160 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. The suggested PSU is not listed for Intel but is 450 W for NVIDIA. The bus interface is IGP versus PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Dimensions are only recorded for the NVIDIA part: 240 mm length, 111 mm height, 40 mm width. The release dates differ, with the Arc B370 launching on January 26, 2026, and the RTX 4060 Ti on March 31, 2024. The RTX 4060 Ti lists a predecessor of GeForce 30 and successor of GeForce 50. The Arc B370 has no predecessor or successor listed. The launch MSRP for the RTX 4060 Ti is 399 USD. The Arc B370 has no launch MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for both GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 delivers 22.06 TFLOPS, which is 3.6 times higher.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 34 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc B370 has 10 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W and requires no power connector. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a TDP of 160 W and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector with a 450 W suggested power supply.

Q: When were these GPUs released?

A: The Intel Arc B370 was released on January 26, 2026, and is marked as active. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 was released on March 31, 2024, and is marked as end-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B370 wins in scenarios prioritizing power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP allows deployment in fanless or low-power designs, and the IGP slot width means it occupies no expansion slot. The system shared memory eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM allocation, simplifying system design for portable devices. The 3 nm process node and Intel foundry fabrication represent the latest manufacturing technology. The active production status indicates ongoing availability. Its performance class, matching the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 within 0.2%, suits basic graphics tasks where dedicated gaming performance is not required.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 wins decisively in raw performance metrics. Its 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 344.8 GTexel/s texture rate, and 121.7 GPixel/s pixel rate are multiples of the Intel part's capabilities. The 8 GB dedicated GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides consistent performance without competing with system memory. The 136 tensor cores enable AI acceleration, and 34 RT cores provide ray tracing hardware. The 50th percentile ranking versus the 5th percentile for the Arc B370 confirms its mainstream positioning. The dual-slot design with active cooling supports sustained high-performance workloads.

The data shows no overlap in intended use cases. The Arc B370, with its 10 RT cores and 1280 shading units, handles light graphics acceleration in mobile processors. The RTX 4060 Ti, with 4352 shading units and dedicated memory, targets desktop gaming at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The 2.5 times pixel rate advantage and 3.6 times texture rate advantage leave no scenario where the Intel part competes on equal footing. The RTX 4060 Ti's end-of-life status indicates it is being phased out, but its recorded specifications still place it firmly in the mid-range desktop segment. The Arc B370's nearest rivals, all scoring within 1.5% of its 1184 result, show that this integrated GPU sits at the bottom of the performance spectrum in the database.