Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a single benchmark result for the Intel Arc B370: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no benchmark entries in the database, so no direct head-to-head comparison can be drawn from measured performance. The Arc B370's score places it in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, indicating entry-level positioning. Its nearest rivals in the database are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (average score 1186, a 0.2% difference), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (average score 1190, a 0.5% difference), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (average score 1192, a 0.7% difference), and the AMD FirePro M2000 (average score 1168, a 1.4% difference in favor of the Arc B370). These narrow deltas show the Arc B370 clustering tightly with older mobile and desktop discrete parts from over a decade ago, rather than competing with modern data center accelerators.

The Data Center GPU Max 1350, by contrast, shows an average benchmark score of 0 and occupies the 50th percentile in the database. That percentile ranking, combined with the absence of any recorded benchmark runs, means the database cannot substantiate a performance comparison between these two products. The Arc B370 at least has a measurable result, while the Data Center GPU Max 1350 has none. Consequently, the head-to-head section must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than benchmark deltas.

FAQ

Q: What is the sole benchmark score recorded for the Intel Arc B370?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a single recorded result: 1184 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: How does the Arc B370's score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000.

Q: Does the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 have any benchmark results?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the Data Center GPU Max 1350, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What are the respective release dates of the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B370 was released on January 26, 2026. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 was released on January 9, 2023.

Q: Which GPU has a higher shading unit count?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 14,336 shading units, compared to 1,280 on the Intel Arc B370.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The Arc B370 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 96 GB of HBM2e memory on an 8192-bit bus with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design lineages. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip with the Generation 12.5 architecture, part of the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation, and is built on a 10 nm process, also at Intel. The process node difference is stark: 3 nm versus 10 nm, which reflects the consumer-integrated versus data center-optimized design goals.

The transistor counts differ dramatically. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 packs 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 78.1 million transistors per mm². The Arc B370's transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown. The shading unit count favors the data center part heavily: 14,336 versus 1,280. Texture mapping units stand at 896 versus 40, and ray tracing cores at 112 versus 10. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 has zero ROPs, while the Arc B370 has 20. This reflects a design where pixel output is not a priority for compute-focused workloads.

Clock behavior also diverges. The Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 has a base clock of 750 MHz and a boost clock of 1550 MHz. Despite the lower boost, the data center part's massive parallel array delivers far higher throughput. The API support differs as well: the Arc B370 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Data Center GPU Max 1350 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6 but has no Vulkan entry in the database.

The Verdict

The data shows two products with no overlapping performance measurements. The Intel Arc B370 is a low-power integrated graphics solution with a measured 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are legacy discrete mobile and desktop parts from the HD 5000 and HD 7000 series, all within 1.4% of its score. This indicates that the Arc B370's performance level is comparable to early-2010s entry-level graphics, suitable for basic rendering tasks but not for demanding workloads.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350, with no benchmark data, cannot be positioned on the same performance scale. Its specification sheet, however, points to an entirely different purpose. The 96 GB HBM2e memory, 8192-bit bus, 2.46 TB/s bandwidth, 44.44 TFLOPS FP32, and 14,336 shading units position it as a compute accelerator. The 450 W TDP, OAM Module slot width, and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface confirm a server-oriented design. The Arc B370's 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, and system-shared memory place it in portable devices.

The verdict from the recorded data is that these are not competitors. The Arc B370 serves as an integrated GPU for thin-and-light systems, while the Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a high-memory-bandwidth accelerator for data center compute. Direct comparison is impossible without benchmark entries for the latter. The database shows the Arc B370's measured result and the Data Center GPU Max 1350's absence of results, so any purchase decision would hinge on workload type, not on head-to-head performance.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The process node: 3 nm for the Arc B370 versus 10 nm for the Data Center GPU Max 1350. Transistors: unknown for the Arc B370 versus 100,000 million for the data center part. Die size: unknown versus 1280 mm². Transistor density: not applicable versus 78.1 million per mm². Base clock: 300 MHz versus 750 MHz. Boost clock: 2400 MHz versus 1550 MHz. Memory clock: system-shared versus 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective. Memory size: system-shared versus 96 GB. Memory type: system-shared versus HBM2e. Bus width: system-shared versus 8192 bit. Bandwidth: system-dependent versus 2.46 TB/s.

Shading units: 1,280 versus 14,336. TMUs: 40 versus 896. ROPs: 20 versus 0. Ray tracing cores: 10 versus 112. Pixel rate: 48.00 GPixel/s versus 0 MPixel/s. Texture rate: 96.00 GTexel/s versus 1,388.8 GTexel/s. FP32: 6.144 TFLOPS versus 44.44 TFLOPS. FP16: 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1). TDP: 25 W versus 450 W. Slot width: IGP versus OAM Module. Power connectors: none versus not recorded. Suggested PSU: not recorded versus 850 W. Bus interface: IGP versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: portable device-dependent versus no outputs. DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (12_1). OpenGL: 4.6 in both. Vulkan: 1.4 for the Arc B370 versus no entry for the data center part. Release date: January 26, 2026 versus January 9, 2023. The data center part has a successor listed (H3C Graphics), while the Arc B370 has none.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B370 wins in integration and power efficiency. Its 25 W TDP and IGP slot width mean it operates without external power connectors, making it suitable for portable devices. The 3 nm process and 300 MHz base clock suggest low idle and load power draw. The display outputs are portable device-dependent, indicating it is designed to drive embedded or laptop screens. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support provide modern API coverage for consumer workloads. The measured 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, while low in absolute terms, still places it within 1.4% of several dedicated GPUs from the HD 5000 and HD 7000 generations, so it can handle legacy gaming or light 3D applications.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins in raw compute throughput and memory capacity. The 44.44 TFLOPS FP32 and 44.44 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) figures indicate sustained compute performance for scientific or AI workloads. The 96 GB HBM2e memory with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth provides massive data movement capability. The 1,388.8 GTexel/s texture rate and 112 ray tracing cores support geometry-heavy or ray-traced compute tasks. The 850 W suggested PSU and OAM Module form factor confirm rack-mounted deployment. The absence of display outputs means it is not intended for graphics output, and the lack of Vulkan support further narrows its role to compute accelerators rather than general rendering.

The recorded data does not provide any shared benchmark where both GPUs have results, so the wins are drawn solely from specification deltas. The Arc B370 is the choice for portable, low-power integrated graphics. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 is the choice for high-throughput compute with extensive memory capacity. Each dominates in its respective domain, and neither encroaches on the other's territory.