Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Arc B370 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 does not contain any shared benchmark tests. The Arc B370 has a single recorded result in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, scoring 1184 points. The Arc Pro A60 has two recorded results, both in Geekbench: an OpenCL score of 63485 and a Vulkan score of 57166. Because these tests are entirely different workloads and measurement methodologies, a direct head-to-head comparison using identical benchmarks is impossible from the database.

The Arc B370's score of 1184 places it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the recorded data are older discrete parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B370. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The only rival that scores lower is the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168, which is 1.4% behind the Arc B370. This places the Arc B370 in a performance bracket that is essentially level with those legacy mobile and entry desktop parts.

The Arc Pro A60 presents a completely different performance profile. Its average benchmark score across the two Geekbench tests is 60326. This puts it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The database shows its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, which has an average score of 60347, a delta of 0.0%. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60140, 0.3% behind the Arc Pro A60. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, which is 2.5% ahead of the Arc Pro A60. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657, which is 2.8% behind. The data indicates the Arc Pro A60 sits in a performance tier that is statistically indistinguishable from the RTX 4090 in this particular aggregate metric, despite massive architectural and market differences between those two products.

Within its own two-test dataset, the Arc Pro A60 shows a clear preference for the OpenCL workload. The OpenCL score of 63485 is 11.0% higher than the Vulkan score of 57166. This gap suggests that the driver and hardware configuration delivers better raw compute throughput under the OpenCL API than under Vulkan for Geekbench's specific test patterns.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc B370 wins in the efficiency and integration category. It is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, using system shared memory, and requires no power connectors. It is designed for portable devices where the display output is device dependent. Its compute capabilities include 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16, with a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. These metrics position it as a low-power integrated solution for basic graphics tasks and light gaming.

The Arc Pro A60 wins decisively in raw compute performance. Its average benchmark score of 60326 is over 50 times higher than the Arc B370's 1184 score. The Arc Pro A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16, which is 36.7% higher FP32 throughput and 36.6% higher FP16 throughput than the Arc B370. The pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s is 173.3% higher, and the texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s is 173.3% higher than the Arc B370's rates.

The Arc Pro A60 also wins on memory subsystem. It has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc B370 has no dedicated memory at all, relying entirely on system shared memory with bandwidth that is system dependent. For workloads that require consistent memory bandwidth, such as large data sets or high-resolution textures, the Arc Pro A60's dedicated memory is a clear advantage.

The Arc Pro A60 wins on display capabilities with 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, while the Arc B370's display outputs are portable device dependent. The Arc Pro A60 also has a higher shading unit count at 2048 versus 1280 for the Arc B370, along with more texture mapping units (128 vs 40), more render output units (64 vs 20), and more ray tracing cores (16 vs 10).

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process node. The Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip with the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. The transistor counts reflect this difference: the Arc Pro A60 has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The Arc B370's transistor count and die size are unknown in the database.

The Arc B370 belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation, while the Arc Pro A60 belongs to the Alchemist Pro Series generation. The release dates differ significantly: the Arc B370 was released on 2026-01-26, while the Arc Pro A60 was released on 2023-06-05. Both are listed as Active production status.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Arc Pro A60 has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The Arc Pro A60 starts at a much higher base clock, while the Arc B370 has a higher boost ceiling. The Arc Pro A60's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate.

The power profile is a major differentiator. The Arc B370 consumes only 25 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors needed. The Arc Pro A60 consumes 130 W TDP, requires a single-slot form factor, and suggests a 300 W power supply. The Arc Pro A60 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the Arc B370 uses an integrated graphics processor bus interface.

Both GPUs support the same API levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has tensor cores listed in the database. The Arc B370 has 10 ray tracing cores, while the Arc Pro A60 has 16 ray tracing cores.

The Verdict

The data shows two products designed for entirely different use cases. The Arc B370 is a low-power integrated solution. Its 25 W TDP, system shared memory, and portable device dependent display outputs indicate it is meant for thin and light laptops or compact devices where battery life and thermal limits are paramount. Its benchmark score of 1184 places it at the 5th percentile, which means it is only suitable for basic graphics acceleration, everyday productivity, and light media playback. Its nearest rivals are all legacy ATI and AMD parts from a much older era, confirming its modest compute capabilities.

The Arc Pro A60 is a professional workstation GPU. Its 130 W TDP, single-slot design, 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, and 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for professional visualization, compute workloads, and multi-display setups. Its average benchmark score of 60326 places it at the 88th percentile, and its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 with a delta of 0.0%. This indicates the Arc Pro A60 delivers compute performance in the same class as one of the most powerful consumer GPUs available, despite being a pro-focused card.

For users who need a discrete GPU for professional work, CAD, content creation, or compute tasks, the Arc Pro A60 is the clear choice based on the recorded data. Its higher FP32 throughput, dedicated memory, and superior pixel and texture rates confirm this. For users who need an integrated graphics solution in a portable device with minimal power draw, the Arc B370 is the appropriate selection. The 25 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it suitable for devices without discrete GPU support.

The performance gap is enormous. The Arc Pro A60's average benchmark score is 50 times higher than the Arc B370's single score. No user should confuse these two products. The Arc B370 is an entry-level integrated solution, while the Arc Pro A60 is a high-performance professional GPU.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to the Intel Arc Pro A60 in raw compute performance?

A: The Arc Pro A60 is significantly faster. Its average benchmark score is 60326, while the Arc B370 scores 1184. The Arc Pro A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc B370, a 36.7% advantage.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Arc Pro A60 has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Arc B370 has a higher boost clock at 2400 MHz, compared to 2050 MHz for the Arc Pro A60. However, the Arc Pro A60 has a much higher base clock at 900 MHz versus 300 MHz for the Arc B370.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Arc B370 consumes 25 W TDP and requires no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics processor. The Arc Pro A60 consumes 130 W TDP, uses a single-slot form factor, and suggests a 300 W power supply.

Q: Which GPU has better API support?

A: Both GPUs support the same API levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. There is no difference in API support between the two.

Q: How does the Arc Pro A60 rank against its nearest rival in the database?

A: The Arc Pro A60's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, which has an average score of 60347. The Arc Pro A60 is 0.0% behind this score, making the two statistically equivalent in the aggregated benchmark metric.

Q: What is the release date difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Arc B370 was released on 2026-01-26, while the Arc Pro A60 was released on 2023-06-05. The Arc B370 is over two years newer in release date.