Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains only one benchmark result for the Intel Arc B370: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. The Intel Arc G3 currently has no benchmark entries in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no recorded test results. Consequently, direct head-to-head comparisons are limited to the B370's performance against its nearest rivals rather than against the G3.

The Arc B370's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database. This percentile ranking indicates that the majority of recorded graphics processors deliver higher performance in this specific test. The nearest rival data shows the B370 trailing the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 by a marginal 0.2% (that GPU averages 1186), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 by 0.5% (averaging 1190), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M by 0.7% (averaging 1192). Against the AMD FirePro M2000, the B370 leads by 1.4% (that card averages 1168). These delta percentages are extremely small, indicating that the B370 sits in a tightly clustered performance band where single-digit score differences separate adjacent products.

For the Arc G3, the absence of benchmark data means no wins or losses can be recorded. The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, and both wins counters (winsA and winsB) are zero. The G3's percentile ranking of 50th percentile is present in the database, but without an average score or rival comparisons, this percentile appears to be a placeholder rather than a computed value. The data simply does not yet contain performance measurements for the G3.

FAQ

Q: What is the only benchmark score recorded for the Intel Arc B370?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a single recorded benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its closest recorded rivals?

A: The Arc B370 trails the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 by 0.2%, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M by 0.7%. It leads the AMD FirePro M2000 by 1.4%.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The Arc G3 has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. The Arc G3 is listed at the 50th percentile, though this is not supported by any recorded performance data.

Q: Are there any head-to-head benchmark results between the B370 and G3?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmarks array is empty, and both the winsA and winsB counters are zero.

Q: Do the two GPUs share identical specifications?

A: Yes. Both use the Panther Lake chip, Xe3-LPG architecture, 3 nm process, 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, 10 RT cores, 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, 12.29 TFLOPS FP16, and a 25 W TDP, among other matching fields.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc B370 and Intel Arc G3 share the same underlying architecture. Both are built on the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. The manufacturing process is identical at 3 nm, with Intel as the foundry for both. Transistor counts and die sizes are listed as unknown for each, so no differentiation can be made on those physical characteristics.

The compute configuration matches exactly: 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster operations units, and 10 ray tracing cores. Neither GPU lists tensor cores. The FP32 compute throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS for both, and FP16 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 96.00 GTexel/s for both parts.

Clock behavior is also identical. Both have a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Neither has a recorded game clock. Memory configuration is system shared for both, including size, type, bus width, and bandwidth, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The API support matches across DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The only architectural difference visible in the data is the release date. The Arc B370 was released earlier, while the Arc G3 follows later. Both are marked as Active in production status. No predecessor or successor is listed for either. The slot width is IGP for both, with no power connectors required and a 25 W TDP. Display outputs are portable device dependent for both.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Arc B370 is the only one of the two with measurable performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals show it clustered within a 1.4% range of comparable products. The B370's performance is effectively a statistical tie with the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, and AMD Radeon HD 7650M, while holding a slight edge over the AMD FirePro M2000.

The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark results in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, its benchmarks array is empty, and it has no nearest rivals. The 50th percentile ranking listed for the G3 cannot be validated against any measured data. From a purely data-driven perspective, the G3's performance is unquantified, and no verdict can be rendered on its capabilities.

For users selecting between these two, the data supports the B370 as the part with confirmed performance characteristics. The G3's identical specifications suggest it should perform similarly, but the database contains no measurements to confirm that expectation. The B370's single benchmark score, while modest at the 5th percentile, at least provides a concrete reference point. The G3 offers no such reference.

Specification Differences

The Intel Arc B370 and Intel Arc G3 differ in only one recorded specification field: the release date. The Arc B370 has a release date of 2026-01-26, while the Arc G3 has a later release date of 2026-05-31. All other specification fields are identical between the two.

Both share the following specifications:

• Chip: Panther Lake
• Architecture: Xe3-LPG
• Generation: Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake)
• Process node: 3 nm
• Foundry: Intel
• Base clock: 300 MHz
• Boost clock: 2400 MHz
• Memory: System Shared (size, type, bus width, bandwidth)
• Shading units: 1280
• TMUs: 40
• ROPs: 20
• RT cores: 10
• Pixel rate: 48.00 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 96.00 GTexel/s
• FP32: 6.144 TFLOPS
• FP16: 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 25 W
• Slot width: IGP
• Power connectors: None
• Bus interface: IGP
• Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent
• APIs: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4
• Production status: Active

The launch MSRP is not listed for either product, so no price information exists in the database. Transistor count and die size are unknown for both. Neither has a listed predecessor or successor.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B370 wins in the only category where data exists: measured benchmark performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 is the sole recorded result, and it provides a baseline for comparison against its nearest rivals. The B370's 1.4% advantage over the AMD FirePro M2000 is its only outright win against a named competitor, while its deficits of 0.2%, 0.5%, and 0.7% against the HD 5570, HD 5770, and HD 7650M respectively are within run-to-run variance territory.

The Intel Arc G3 has no wins in any benchmark category, as the database contains no test results for it. The G3 cannot be said to outperform the B370 in any measured metric. Its 50th percentile listing is not backed by any score, so it carries no analytical weight.

For use-case selection, the B370 is the only part with data supporting a decision. Its 5th percentile ranking suggests it is suited for light graphics workloads where the 3DMark Steel Nomad test is representative. The B370's system shared memory and IGP form factor indicate integration into portable devices, with display outputs described as portable device dependent. The G3, sharing identical specifications, would logically occupy the same role, but without recorded measurements, that remains an assumption rather than a data-supported conclusion.