GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A770

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070

CORE STATE AD104

VRAM 12 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2475 MHz

TDP 200 W

BUS WIDTH 192 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

2,969

3,854

geekbench_opencl

109,175

155,145

geekbench_vulkan

94,284

173,261

passmark_directx_10

N/A

139

passmark_directx_11

N/A

244

passmark_directx_12

N/A

103

passmark_directx_9

N/A

320

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,164

passmark_g3d

N/A

26,927

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

14,720

Analysis: Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

For this graphics card comparison, NVIDIA's RTX 4070 demonstrates its superiority convincingly. If you're streaming at 4K, NVIDIA's RTX 4070 steadily outperforms Arc A770 (Intel) by substantial gaps. The frame rate margin widens especially larger at increased settings. This video card handles demanding scenarios with capability. Its architectural superiority are obvious.

The VRAM advantage of NVIDIA's RTX 4070 becomes increasingly important at demanding settings. Demanding scenarios consumes notable graphics memory, and NVIDIA's RTX 4070 provides additional headroom. The results into smoother gameplay in demanding titles. Modern releases might progressively consume extra graphics memory. This superiority widens over the years.

The VRAM advantage of NVIDIA's RTX 4070 turns particularly critical at higher quality levels. Demanding scenarios consumes significant graphics memory, and NVIDIA's RTX 4070 provides more capacity. The translates into better experiences in demanding titles. Modern releases should only require more graphics memory. The benefit grows over generations.

Ultimately: NVIDIA's RTX 4070 claims this comparison convincingly. Users wanting gaming capability will definitely favor NVIDIA's RTX 4070 over Arc A770 (Intel). The test results confirms this verdict. Your workloads might execute noticeably smoother. This is a obvious winner in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A770

RTX 4070

Core Specs

Shading Units

4,096

5,888 +43.8%

Shaders

4,096

5,888 +43.8%

TMUs

256

184 -28.1%

ROPs

128

64 -50.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

512

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2100 MHz

1920 MHz

Boost Clock

2400 MHz

2475 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB

12 GB

VRAM (MB)

16,384

12,288 -25.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

GDDR6X

Memory Bus

256 bit

192 bit

Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s

504.2 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

16 MB

36 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

307.2 GPixel/s

158.4 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

614.4 GTexel/s

455.4 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

19.66 TFLOPS

29.15 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

2.458 TFLOPS (1:8)

455.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

39.32 TFLOPS (2:1)

29.15 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

46 +43.8%

Tensor Cores

—

184

XMX Cores

512

—

Power

TDP

225 W

200 W

TDP (W)

225

200 -11.1%

Suggested PSU

550 W

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

1x 16-pin

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ada Lovelace

GPU Name

DG2-512

AD104

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 7)

GeForce 40

Process Size

6 nm

5 nm

Transistors

21,700 million

35,800 million

Die Size

406 mm²

294 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

53.4M / mm²

121.8M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.9

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Length

—

240 mm 9.4 inches

Height

—

110 mm 4.3 inches

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

329 USD

599 USD

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

GeForce 30

Successor

Battlemage

GeForce 50

View Arc A770 Details View GeForce RTX 4070 Details