GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

T400 4 GB

CORE STATE TU117

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Turing

PROCESS 12 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

2,612

N/A

geekbench_opencl

98,554

17,320

geekbench_vulkan

85,631

16,263

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

181

N/A

passmark_g2d

732

N/A

passmark_g3d

12,534

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

5,368

N/A

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

Examining the test results for Intel's Arc A750 and NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 4 GB, the story of similar capability appears. No card leads repeatedly in every titles. This alternating of wins suggests underlying equivalence. Those confront a true selection with these options. Either cards deliver strong graphics throughput.

Rather than obsessing on marginal frame rate gains, potential builders should weigh secondary factors. TDP, noise levels, construction, and service options frequently matter greater than small benchmark variations. Such considerations could influence the balance. Weigh past simply frame rates. This full picture counts.

For those torn between Intel's Arc A750 and NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 4 GB, rest confident that both selection offers equivalent visual results. This performance numbers confirms no obvious victor. Make your choice on alternative factors and benefit from excellent rendering results either way. Either are winners in their particular way. Select comfortably.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A750

T400 4 GB

Core Specs

Shading Units

3,584

384 -89.3%

Shaders

3,584

384 -89.3%

TMUs

224

24 -89.3%

ROPs

112

16 -85.7%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

448

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2050 MHz

420 MHz

Boost Clock

2400 MHz

1425 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

4,096 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

256 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s

80.00 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

16 MB

1024 KB

Performance

Pixel Rate

268.8 GPixel/s

22.80 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

537.6 GTexel/s

34.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

17.20 TFLOPS

1,094.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

XMX Cores

448

—

Power

TDP

225 W

30 W

TDP (W)

225

30 -86.7%

Suggested PSU

550 W

200 W

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

None

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Turing

GPU Name

DG2-512

TU117

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 7)

Quadro Turing (Tx000)

Process Size

6 nm

12 nm

Transistors

21,700 million

4,700 million

Die Size

406 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

53.4M / mm²

23.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

7.5

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Single-slot

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

289 USD

—

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

Quadro Volta

Successor

Battlemage

Workstation Ampere

View Arc A750 Details View T400 4 GB Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A750

T400 4 GB

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons