GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

CORE STATE GB206

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1957 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

2,612

2,374.5

geekbench_opencl

98,554

N/A

geekbench_vulkan

85,631

113,865

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

181

N/A

passmark_g2d

732

N/A

passmark_g3d

12,534

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

5,368

N/A

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Examining the test data for Arc A750 from Intel and NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell from NVIDIA, the story of close capability emerges. None of the option leads repeatedly across the scenarios. This swapping of victories indicates core parity. Users have a actual choice between them. Both cards deliver strong graphics performance.

When gaming capability is remarkably similar, MSRP and features get the main considerations. Consider hardware RT performance, DLSS/FSR support, TDP, and software support when picking between Arc A750 from Intel and NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell from NVIDIA. Such elements might influence the scales. Consider holistically. This larger view plays a role.

For those uncertain between Arc A750 from Intel and NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell from NVIDIA, be assured that both pick offers similar visual throughput. This score figures demonstrates no definite champion. Reach your determination on secondary elements and appreciate solid gaming performance in any case. Either are excellent in this particular regard. Choose confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A750

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Core Specs

Shading Units

3,584

4,352 +21.4%

Shaders

3,584

4,352 +21.4%

TMUs

224

136 -39.3%

ROPs

112

64 -42.9%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

448

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2050 MHz

982 MHz

Boost Clock

2400 MHz

1957 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1125 MHz 18 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

16 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

16,384 +100.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

GDDR7

Memory Bus

256 bit

128 bit

Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s

288.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

16 MB

32 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

268.8 GPixel/s

125.2 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

537.6 GTexel/s

266.2 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

17.20 TFLOPS

17.03 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

266.2 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

17.03 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

34 +21.4%

Tensor Cores

—

136

XMX Cores

448

—

Power

TDP

225 W

70 W

TDP (W)

225

70 -68.9%

Suggested PSU

550 W

250 W

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

None

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Blackwell 2.0

GPU Name

DG2-512

GB206

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 7)

Blackwell PRO W (x000)

Process Size

6 nm

5 nm

Transistors

21,700 million

21,900 million

Die Size

406 mm²

181 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

53.4M / mm²

121.0M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

12.0

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Length

—

167 mm 6.6 inches

Height

—

69 mm 2.7 inches

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 5.0 x8

Other

Launch Price

289 USD

—

Production

End-of-life

Active

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

Workstation Ada

Successor

Battlemage

—

View Arc A750 Details View RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A750

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons