GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,612
3,522
geekbench_opencl
98,554
388,405
geekbench_vulkan
85,631
N/A
passmark_directx_10
65
N/A
passmark_directx_11
72
N/A
passmark_directx_12
70
N/A
passmark_directx_9
181
N/A
passmark_g2d
732
N/A
passmark_g3d
12,534
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
5,368
N/A

Analysis: Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D

If gaming capability is this evenly balanced, this matchup between the Arc A750 and NVIDIA RTX 6000D becomes more multifaceted. These cards swap leads throughout multiple games. This overall picture is one of surprising equality. Neither comes out as a obvious champion. This determination rests on individual requirements.

When frame rates is extremely close, MSRP and features grow the primary factors. Evaluate hardware RT performance, reconstruction technology, thermal requirements, and driver maturity when picking between the Arc A750 and NVIDIA RTX 6000D. Such factors could affect the decision. Evaluate broadly. The complete picture counts.

If benchmark scores is remarkably comparable, value and features get the deciding elements. Consider ray tracing capability, reconstruction support, energy efficiency, and software maturity when picking between the Arc A750 and NVIDIA RTX 6000D. Such factors might tip the decision. Weigh holistically. This larger picture counts.

To summarize, the evaluation between the Arc A750 and NVIDIA RTX 6000D ends in a near deadlock. Gaming differences are small and questionable to impact everyday experience. Focus your selection on cost, software options, and particular functionality needs. Each are strong options. The balance is genuine.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A750
RTX 6000D
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,584
19,968 +457.1%
Shaders
3,584
19,968 +457.1%
TMUs
224
624 +178.6%
ROPs
112
192 +71.4%
SM Count
156
Execution Units
448
Clocks
Base Clock
2050 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2430 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
84 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
86,016 +950.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
256 bit
448 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
1.57 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
128 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
466.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
1,516.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
17.20 TFLOPS
97.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
156 +457.1%
Tensor Cores
624
XMX Cores
448
Power
TDP
225 W
600 W
TDP (W)
225
600 +166.7%
Suggested PSU
550 W
1000 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
DG2-512
GB202
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 7)
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
21,700 million
92,200 million
Die Size
406 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
53.4M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
289 USD
8,565 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
Workstation Ada
Successor
Battlemage
View Arc A750 Details View RTX 6000D Details